ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  resopab2 GIF version

Theorem resopab2 4682
Description: Restriction of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2007.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
resopab2 (𝐴𝐵 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)})
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem resopab2
StepHypRef Expression
1 resopab 4679 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑))}
2 ssel 2966 . . . . . 6 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
32pm4.71d 379 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)))
43anbi1d 446 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)))
5 anass 387 . . . 4 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)))
64, 5syl6rbb 190 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)))
76opabbidv 3850 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝜑))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)})
81, 7syl5eq 2100 1 (𝐴𝐵 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 101   = wceq 1259  wcel 1409  wss 2944  {copab 3844  cres 4374
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-io 640  ax-5 1352  ax-7 1353  ax-gen 1354  ax-ie1 1398  ax-ie2 1399  ax-8 1411  ax-10 1412  ax-11 1413  ax-i12 1414  ax-bndl 1415  ax-4 1416  ax-14 1421  ax-17 1435  ax-i9 1439  ax-ial 1443  ax-i5r 1444  ax-ext 2038  ax-sep 3902  ax-pow 3954  ax-pr 3971
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-3an 898  df-tru 1262  df-nf 1366  df-sb 1662  df-clab 2043  df-cleq 2049  df-clel 2052  df-nfc 2183  df-ral 2328  df-rex 2329  df-v 2576  df-un 2949  df-in 2951  df-ss 2958  df-pw 3388  df-sn 3408  df-pr 3409  df-op 3411  df-opab 3846  df-xp 4378  df-rel 4379  df-res 4384
This theorem is referenced by:  resmpt  4683
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator