Theorem rexeqf 2623

Description: Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
raleq1f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
raleq1f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexeqf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem rexeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleq1f.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		raleq1f.2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2289	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2203	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 460	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	exbid 1595	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
7		df-rex 2422	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
8		df-rex 2422	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
9	6, 7, 8	3bitr4g 222	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1331  ∃wex 1468   ∈ wcel 1480  Ⅎwnfc 2268  ∃wrex 2417

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-rex 2422

This theorem is referenced by:  rexeq  2627