Theorem riotabidva 5746

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction form). (rabbidva 2674 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
riotabidva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
riotabidva	⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem riotabidva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		riotabidva.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	pm5.32da 447	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
3	2	iotabidv 5109	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)))
4		df-riota 5730	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
5		df-riota 5730	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))
6	3, 4, 5	3eqtr4g 2197	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  ℩cio 5086  ℩crio 5729

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-rex 2422  df-uni 3737  df-iota 5088  df-riota 5730

This theorem is referenced by:  riotabiia  5747  divfnzn  9413