Theorem sb7af 1966

Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1736. Similar to dfsb7a 1967 but does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be distinct. Similar to sb7f 1965 in that it involves a dummy variable 𝑧, but expressed in terms of ∀ rather than ∃. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sb7af.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb7af	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem sb7af

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb6 1858	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))
2	1	sbbii 1738	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))
3		sb7af.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
4	3	sbco2 1936	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5		sb6 1858	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3i 209	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1329  Ⅎwnf 1436  [wsb 1735

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736

This theorem is referenced by:  dfsb7a  1967