Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > sbciedf | GIF version |
Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sbcied.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) |
sbcied.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
sbciedf.3 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
sbciedf.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sbciedf | ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sbcied.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) | |
2 | sbciedf.4 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) | |
3 | sbciedf.3 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
4 | sbcied.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
5 | 4 | ex 114 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
6 | 3, 5 | alrimi 1502 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
7 | sbciegft 2934 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
8 | 1, 2, 6, 7 | syl3anc 1216 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1329 = wceq 1331 Ⅎwnf 1436 ∈ wcel 1480 [wsbc 2904 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 698 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-10 1483 ax-11 1484 ax-i12 1485 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2119 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 964 df-tru 1334 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-clab 2124 df-cleq 2130 df-clel 2133 df-nfc 2268 df-v 2683 df-sbc 2905 |
This theorem is referenced by: sbcied 2940 sbc2iegf 2974 csbiebt 3034 sbcnestgf 3046 ovmpodxf 5889 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |