ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ssopab2 GIF version

Theorem ssopab2 4167
Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2013.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ssopab2 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem ssopab2
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfa1 1506 . . . 4 𝑥𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓)
2 nfa1 1506 . . . . . 6 𝑦𝑦(𝜑𝜓)
3 sp 1473 . . . . . . 7 (∀𝑦(𝜑𝜓) → (𝜑𝜓))
43anim2d 335 . . . . . 6 (∀𝑦(𝜑𝜓) → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
52, 4eximd 1576 . . . . 5 (∀𝑦(𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
65sps 1502 . . . 4 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
71, 6eximd 1576 . . 3 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
87ss2abdv 3140 . 2 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
9 df-opab 3960 . 2 {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
10 df-opab 3960 . 2 {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
118, 9, 103sstr4g 3110 1 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 103  wal 1314   = wceq 1316  wex 1453  {cab 2103  wss 3041  cop 3500  {copab 3958
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 683  ax-5 1408  ax-7 1409  ax-gen 1410  ax-ie1 1454  ax-ie2 1455  ax-8 1467  ax-10 1468  ax-11 1469  ax-i12 1470  ax-bndl 1471  ax-4 1472  ax-17 1491  ax-i9 1495  ax-ial 1499  ax-i5r 1500  ax-ext 2099
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1422  df-sb 1721  df-clab 2104  df-cleq 2110  df-clel 2113  df-nfc 2247  df-in 3047  df-ss 3054  df-opab 3960
This theorem is referenced by:  ssopab2b  4168  ssopab2i  4169  ssopab2dv  4170
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator