Theorem ssoprab2 5827

Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Compare ssopab2 4197. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssoprab2	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem ssoprab2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 19	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
2	1	anim2d 335	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
3	2	alimi 1431	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑧((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
4		exim 1578	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑧((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	3, 4	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	alimi 1431	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑦(∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
7		exim 1578	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦(∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
8	6, 7	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
9	8	alimi 1431	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
10		exim 1578	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
11	9, 10	syl 14	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
12	11	ss2abdv 3170	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
13		df-oprab 5778	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
14		df-oprab 5778	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
15	12, 13, 14	3sstr4g 3140	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1329   = wceq 1331  ∃wex 1468  {cab 2125   ⊆ wss 3071  ⟨cop 3530  {coprab 5775

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-oprab 5778

This theorem is referenced by:  ssoprab2b  5828