ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ssoprab2i GIF version

Theorem ssoprab2i 5644
Description: Inference of operation class abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
ssoprab2i.1 (𝜑𝜓)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ssoprab2i {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem ssoprab2i
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssoprab2i.1 . . . . 5 (𝜑𝜓)
21anim2i 334 . . . 4 ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
322eximi 1533 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
43ssopab2i 4060 . 2 {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
5 dfoprab2 5603 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
6 dfoprab2 5603 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
74, 5, 63sstr4i 3047 1 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 102   = wceq 1285  wex 1422  wss 2982  cop 3419  {copab 3858  {coprab 5564
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2065  ax-sep 3916  ax-pow 3968  ax-pr 3992
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688  df-clab 2070  df-cleq 2076  df-clel 2079  df-nfc 2212  df-v 2612  df-un 2986  df-in 2988  df-ss 2995  df-pw 3402  df-sn 3422  df-pr 3423  df-op 3425  df-opab 3860  df-oprab 5567
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator