Theorem ssrd 3102

Description: Deduction based on subclass definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ssrd.0	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ssrd.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
ssrd.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
ssrd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssrd	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem ssrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrd.0	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ssrd.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	alrimi 1502	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		ssrd.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
5		ssrd.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	4, 5	dfss2f 3088	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
7	3, 6	sylibr 133	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1329  Ⅎwnf 1436   ∈ wcel 1480  Ⅎwnfc 2268   ⊆ wss 3071

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084

This theorem is referenced by:  eqrd  3115  exmidomni  7014