ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ssrelrel GIF version

Theorem ssrelrel 4468
Description: A subclass relationship determined by ordered triples. Use relrelss 4872 to express the antecedent in terms of the relation predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ssrelrel (𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem ssrelrel
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssel 2967 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵))
21alrimiv 1770 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → ∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵))
32alrimivv 1771 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → ∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵))
4 elvvv 4431 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩)
5 eleq1 2116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴))
6 eleq1 2116 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐵 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵))
75, 6imbi12d 227 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → ((𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵) ↔ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
87biimprcd 153 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ((⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
98alimi 1360 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
10 19.23v 1779 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (∀𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)) ↔ (∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
119, 10sylib 131 . . . . . . . . . 10 (∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → (∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
12112alimi 1361 . . . . . . . . 9 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥𝑦(∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
13 19.23vv 1780 . . . . . . . . 9 (∀𝑥𝑦(∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
1412, 13sylib 131 . . . . . . . 8 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
154, 14syl5bi 145 . . . . . . 7 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
1615com23 76 . . . . . 6 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑤𝐴 → (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) → 𝑤𝐵)))
1716a2d 26 . . . . 5 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑤𝐴𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)) → (𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
1817alimdv 1775 . . . 4 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑤(𝑤𝐴𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)) → ∀𝑤(𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵)))
19 dfss2 2962 . . . 4 (𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤𝐴𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)))
20 dfss2 2962 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤𝐴𝑤𝐵))
2118, 19, 203imtr4g 198 . . 3 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → 𝐴𝐵))
2221com12 30 . 2 (𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴𝐵))
233, 22impbid2 135 1 (𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 102  wal 1257   = wceq 1259  wex 1397  wcel 1409  Vcvv 2574  wss 2945  cop 3406   × cxp 4371
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-io 640  ax-5 1352  ax-7 1353  ax-gen 1354  ax-ie1 1398  ax-ie2 1399  ax-8 1411  ax-10 1412  ax-11 1413  ax-i12 1414  ax-bndl 1415  ax-4 1416  ax-14 1421  ax-17 1435  ax-i9 1439  ax-ial 1443  ax-i5r 1444  ax-ext 2038  ax-sep 3903  ax-pow 3955  ax-pr 3972
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-3an 898  df-tru 1262  df-nf 1366  df-sb 1662  df-clab 2043  df-cleq 2049  df-clel 2052  df-nfc 2183  df-v 2576  df-un 2950  df-in 2952  df-ss 2959  df-pw 3389  df-sn 3409  df-pr 3410  df-op 3412  df-opab 3847  df-xp 4379
This theorem is referenced by:  eqrelrel  4469
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator