Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > unab | GIF version |
Description: Union of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
unab | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sbor 1925 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | |
2 | df-clab 2124 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | |
3 | df-clab 2124 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | |
4 | df-clab 2124 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓) | |
5 | 3, 4 | orbi12i 753 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) |
6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3bitr4ri 212 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∨ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}) |
7 | 6 | uneqri 3213 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∨ wo 697 = wceq 1331 ∈ wcel 1480 [wsb 1735 {cab 2123 ∪ cun 3064 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 698 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-10 1483 ax-11 1484 ax-i12 1485 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2119 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1334 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-clab 2124 df-cleq 2130 df-clel 2133 df-nfc 2268 df-v 2683 df-un 3070 |
This theorem is referenced by: unrab 3342 rabun2 3350 dfif6 3471 unopab 4002 dmun 4741 frecabex 6288 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |