HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem 19.38 1077
Description: Theorem 19.38 of [Margaris] p. 90.
Assertion
Ref Expression
19.38 |- ((E.xph -> A.xps) -> A.x(ph -> ps))

Proof of Theorem 19.38
StepHypRef Expression
1 hbe1 1012 . . 3 |- (E.xph -> A.xE.xph)
2 hba1 1000 . . 3 |- (A.xps -> A.xA.xps)
31, 2hbim 1004 . 2 |- ((E.xph -> A.xps) -> A.x(E.xph -> A.xps))
4 19.8a 1025 . . 3 |- (ph -> E.xph)
5 ax-4 970 . . 3 |- (A.xps -> ps)
64, 5imim12i 18 . 2 |- ((E.xph -> A.xps) -> (ph -> ps))
73, 619.21ai 995 1 |- ((E.xph -> A.xps) -> A.x(ph -> ps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3  A.wal 951  E.wex 977
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-gen 960  ax-4 970  ax-5o 972  ax-6o 975
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 978
Copyright terms: Public domain