HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem 2bornot2b 9059
Description: The law of excluded middle. Act III, Theorem 1 of Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark (1602). Its author leaves its proof as an exercise for the reader - "To be, or not to be: that is the question" - starting a trend that has become standard in modern-day textbooks, serving to make the frustrated reader feel inferior, or in some cases to mask the fact that the author does not know its solution. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2006.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
2bornot2b |- (2 x. B \/ -. 2 x. B)

Proof of Theorem 2bornot2b
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-1 4 . . 3 |- (-. 2 x. B -> (2 x. B -> -. 2 x. B))
2 ax-1 4 . . 3 |- (-. 2 x. B -> ((2 x. B -> -. 2 x. B) -> -. 2 x. B))
31, 2mpd 26 . 2 |- (-. 2 x. B -> -. 2 x. B)
4 df-or 222 . 2 |- ((2 x. B \/ -. 2 x. B) <-> (-. 2 x. B -> -. 2 x. B))
53, 4mpbir 188 1 |- (2 x. B \/ -. 2 x. B)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   -> wi 3   \/ wo 220   class class class wbr 2692   x. cmul 5393  2c2 6107
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 145  df-or 222
Copyright terms: Public domain