Theorem 2eu5 1430

Description: An alternate definition of double existential uniqueness (see 2eu4 1429). A mistake sometimes made in the literature is to use E!xE!y to mean "exactly one x and exactly one y." (For example, see Proposition 7.53 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 53.) It turns out that this is actually a weaker assertion, as can be seen by expanding out the formal definitions. This theorem shows that the erroneous definition can be repaired by conjoining A.xE*yph as an additional condition. The correct definition apparently has never been published. (E* means "exists at most one.")

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2eu5	|- ((E!xE!yph /\ A.xE*yph) <-> (E.xE.yph /\ E.zE.wA.xA.y(ph -> (x = z /\ y = w))))

Distinct variable groups:   x,y,z,w   ph,z,w

Proof of Theorem 2eu5

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2eu1 1426	. . 3 |- (A.xE*yph -> (E!xE!yph <-> (E!xE.yph /\ E!yE.xph)))
2	1	pm5.32ri 644	. 2 |- ((E!xE!yph /\ A.xE*yph) <-> ((E!xE.yph /\ E!yE.xph) /\ A.xE*yph))
3		eumo 1388	. . . . 5 |- (E!yE.xph -> E*yE.xph)
4	3	adantl 388	. . . 4 |- ((E!xE.yph /\ E!yE.xph) -> E*yE.xph)
5		2moex 1417	. . . 4 |- (E*yE.xph -> A.xE*yph)
6	4, 5	syl 10	. . 3 |- ((E!xE.yph /\ E!yE.xph) -> A.xE*yph)
7	6	pm4.71i 635	. 2 |- ((E!xE.yph /\ E!yE.xph) <-> ((E!xE.yph /\ E!yE.xph) /\ A.xE*yph))
8		2eu4 1429	. 2 |- ((E!xE.yph /\ E!yE.xph) <-> (E.xE.yph /\ E.zE.wA.xA.y(ph -> (x = z /\ y = w))))
9	2, 7, 8	3bitr2 179	1 |- ((E!xE!yph /\ A.xE*yph) <-> (E.xE.yph /\ E.zE.wA.xA.y(ph -> (x = z /\ y = w))))

Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146   /\ wa 223  A.wal 950  E.wex 956   = wceq 1099  E!weu 1357  E*wmo 1358

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-4 951  ax-5 952  ax-6 953  ax-7 954  ax-gen 955  ax-8 1101  ax-9 1102  ax-10 1103  ax-12 1104  ax-11 1180  ax-17 1190  ax-16 1194  ax-11o 1202

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-or 224  df-an 225  df-ex 957  df-sb 1155  df-eu 1359  df-mo 1360

Copyright terms: Public domain