HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem a12stdy3 1351
Description: Part of a study related to ax-12 1104. The consequent introduces two new variables. There are no distinct variable restrictions.
Assertion
Ref Expression
a12stdy3 |- (A.z(z = x /\ x = y) -> A.vE.y x = w)

Proof of Theorem a12stdy3
StepHypRef Expression
1 a12stdy2 1350 . 2 |- (A.z(z = x /\ x = y) -> A.y y = x)
2 hbae 1128 . 2 |- (A.y y = x -> A.vA.y y = x)
3 a12stdy1 1349 . . 3 |- (A.y y = x -> E.y x = w)
4319.20i 968 . 2 |- (A.vA.y y = x -> A.vE.y x = w)
51, 2, 43syl 20 1 |- (A.z(z = x /\ x = y) -> A.vE.y x = w)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   /\ wa 223  A.wal 950  E.wex 956   = wceq 1099
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-4 951  ax-5 952  ax-6 953  ax-7 954  ax-gen 955  ax-8 1101  ax-9 1102  ax-10 1103  ax-12 1104
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 957
Copyright terms: Public domain