HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem abbid 1576
Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal class abstractions (deduction rule).
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
abbid.1 |- (ph -> A.xph)
abbid.2 |- (ph -> (ps <-> ch))
Assertion
Ref Expression
abbid |- (ph -> {x | ps} = {x | ch})

Proof of Theorem abbid
StepHypRef Expression
1 abbid.1 . . 3 |- (ph -> A.xph)
2 abbid.2 . . 3 |- (ph -> (ps <-> ch))
31, 219.21ai 998 . 2 |- (ph -> A.x(ps <-> ch))
4 eq2ab 1573 . 2 |- ({x | ps} = {x | ch} <-> A.x(ps <-> ch))
53, 4sylibr 200 1 |- (ph -> {x | ps} = {x | ch})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146  A.wal 954   = wceq 956  {cab 1463
This theorem is referenced by:  abbidv 1577  rabeqf 1808  abidhb 1912  opabbid 2669  moabex 2766
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 962  ax-gen 963  ax-8 964  ax-10 966  ax-12 968  ax-17 971  ax-4 973  ax-5o 975  ax-6o 978  ax-9o 1123  ax-10o 1140  ax-16 1210  ax-11o 1218  ax-ext 1459
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 981  df-sb 1172  df-clab 1464  df-cleq 1469  df-clel 1472
Copyright terms: Public domain