HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem axnul 2677
Description: The Null Set Axiom of ZF set theory: there exists a set with no elements. Axiom of Empty Set of [Enderton] p. 18. In some textbooks, this is presented as a separate axiom; here we show it can be derived from Separation ax-sep 2671. This version of the Null Set Axiom tells us that at least one empty set exists, but does not tells us that it is unique - we need the Axiom of Extensionality to do that (see zfnuleu 2675).

This proof, suggested by Jeff Hoffman (3-Feb-2008), does not require the set existence axiom ax-9 1102, unlike some empty set existence proofs (such as the remark in [Kunen] p. 11). This is partly a consequence of the fact that our ax-sep 2671 is not universally closed, unlike Kunen's version. See axnul2 2676 for a similar proof directly from ax-rep 2661.

This theorem should not be referenced by any proof. Instead, use ax-nul 2678 below so that the uses of the Null Set Axiom can be more easily identified.

Assertion
Ref Expression
axnul |- E.xA.y -. y e. x
Distinct variable group:   x,y

Proof of Theorem axnul
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-sep 2671 . 2 |- E.xA.y(y e. x <-> (y e. z /\ (y e. y /\ -. y e. y)))
2 pm3.24 655 . . . . . 6 |- -. (y e. y /\ -. y e. y)
32intnan 688 . . . . 5 |- -. (y e. z /\ (y e. y /\ -. y e. y))
4 id 59 . . . . 5 |- ((y e. x <-> (y e. z /\ (y e. y /\ -. y e. y))) -> (y e. x <-> (y e. z /\ (y e. y /\ -. y e. y))))
53, 4mtbiri 714 . . . 4 |- ((y e. x <-> (y e. z /\ (y e. y /\ -. y e. y))) -> -. y e. x)
6519.20i 968 . . 3 |- (A.y(y e. x <-> (y e. z /\ (y e. y /\ -. y e. y))) -> A.y -. y e. x)
7619.22i 1016 . 2 |- (E.xA.y(y e. x <-> (y e. z /\ (y e. y /\ -. y e. y))) -> E.xA.y -. y e. x)
81, 7ax-mp 7 1 |- E.xA.y -. y e. x
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   <-> wb 146   /\ wa 223  A.wal 950  E.wex 956   e. wcel 1105
This theorem is referenced by:  snex 2718
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-4 951  ax-5 952  ax-gen 955  ax-sep 2671
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-or 224  df-an 225  df-ex 957
Copyright terms: Public domain