| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Deduce a commuted implication from a logical equivalence. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| biimpd.1 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| biimpcd |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | biimpd.1 |
. . 3
| |
| 2 | 1 | biimpd 153 |
. 2
|
| 3 | 2 | com12 11 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: biimpac 418 nbn2 720 ax16 1207 ax16i 1268 nelneq 1558 nelneq2 1559 psssstr 2148 disjsn 2437 mosubopt 2799 tz7.7 2968 limsssuc 3116 nnsuc 3143 peano5 3148 asymref2 3432 ssimaex 3759 chfnrn 3793 ffnfv 3819 cbvfo 3876 elopabi 4107 eloprabi 4108 odi 4200 ereldm 4275 eceqopreq 4303 pssnn 4519 zorn2lem6 4773 alephval3 4883 prub 5078 prnmadd 5080 prlem936 5135 letrt 5506 ssxr 5521 xrletrt 5545 snunioolem 6355 facwordit 6889 climsup 7099 dscmet 7870 pjpj0 9193 5oalem6 9544 eigorth 9703 adjbd1o 9956 atcvatlem 10249 mdsymlem3 10269 fiiu 10386 fiiu2 10413 fgsb 10480 fgsb2 10485 eloi 10539 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 |