| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Elimination of two existential quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2006.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ceqsex2.1 |
|
| ceqsex2.2 |
|
| ceqsex2.3 |
|
| ceqsex2.4 |
|
| ceqsex2.5 |
|
| ceqsex2.6 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ceqsex2 |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | anass 439 |
. . . . 5
| |
| 2 | 1 | exbii 1051 |
. . . 4
|
| 3 | 19.42v 1308 |
. . . 4
| |
| 4 | 2, 3 | bitr 173 |
. . 3
|
| 5 | 4 | exbii 1051 |
. 2
|
| 6 | ax-17 971 |
. . . . 5
| |
| 7 | ceqsex2.1 |
. . . . 5
| |
| 8 | 6, 7 | hban 1009 |
. . . 4
|
| 9 | 8 | hbex 1006 |
. . 3
|
| 10 | ceqsex2.3 |
. . 3
| |
| 11 | ceqsex2.5 |
. . . . 5
| |
| 12 | 11 | anbi2d 616 |
. . . 4
|
| 13 | 12 | exbidv 1279 |
. . 3
|
| 14 | 9, 10, 13 | ceqsex 1834 |
. 2
|
| 15 | ceqsex2.2 |
. . 3
| |
| 16 | ceqsex2.4 |
. . 3
| |
| 17 | ceqsex2.6 |
. . 3
| |
| 18 | 15, 16, 17 | ceqsex 1834 |
. 2
|
| 19 | 5, 14, 18 | 3bitr 177 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: ceqsex2v 1837 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-7 962 ax-gen 963 ax-12 968 ax-17 971 ax-4 973 ax-5o 975 ax-6o 978 ax-9o 1123 ax-ext 1459 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-or 224 df-an 225 df-ex 981 df-sb 1172 df-clab 1464 df-cleq 1469 df-clel 1472 df-v 1812 |