| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ceqsexgv.1 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ceqsexgv |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax-17 969 |
. 2
| |
| 2 | ceqsexgv.1 |
. 2
| |
| 3 | 1, 2 | ceqsexg 1883 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: ceqsrexv 1885 clel3g 1888 imasng 3416 elxp5 3446 fvopabn 3777 2ndconst 4087 xpsnen 4421 ismet 7748 isgrp 7991 spwval2 8595 bsi 10418 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-7 960 ax-gen 961 ax-8 962 ax-12 966 ax-17 969 ax-4 971 ax-5o 973 ax-6o 976 ax-9o 1121 ax-16 1208 ax-11o 1216 ax-ext 1457 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 df-ex 979 df-sb 1170 df-clab 1462 df-cleq 1467 df-clel 1470 df-v 1808 |