| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: A contraposition deduction. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2bid.1 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2bid |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | con2bid.1 |
. 2
| |
| 2 | con2bi 524 |
. 2
| |
| 3 | 1, 2 | sylibr 200 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: con1bid 526 necon2abid 1619 necon2bbid 1620 r19.9rzv 2345 sotric 2855 sotrieq 2856 so 2859 ordtri2 2977 ord0eln0 3018 ordunisuc2 3110 limsssuc 3116 nlimon 3117 oawordeulem 4178 onomeneq 4504 rankr1 4654 ondomcard 4837 prlem934b 5118 suplem2pr 5142 sqgt0sr 5195 suppsr2 5203 suppsr3 5204 xrltnlet 5482 ltnlet 5491 leloet 5499 xrlttrit 5533 xrleloet 5538 xrrebndt 5549 supxrbnd 6046 supxrbnd2 6051 elnnz1 6110 om2uzf1o 6246 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 |