HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem dedth2v 2382
Description: Weak deduction theorem for eliminating a hypothesis with 2 class variables. Note: if the hypothesis can be separated into two hypotheses, each with one class variable, then dedth2h 2385 is simpler to use. See also comments in dedth 2381.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
dedth2v.1 |- (A = if(ph, A, C) -> (ps <-> ch))
dedth2v.2 |- (B = if(ph, B, D) -> (ch <-> th))
dedth2v.3 |- th
Assertion
Ref Expression
dedth2v |- (ph -> ps)

Proof of Theorem dedth2v
StepHypRef Expression
1 dedth2v.3 . 2 |- th
2 iftrue 2364 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> if(ph, A, C) = A)
32eqcomd 1479 . . . 4 |- (ph -> A = if(ph, A, C))
4 dedth2v.1 . . . 4 |- (A = if(ph, A, C) -> (ps <-> ch))
53, 4syl 10 . . 3 |- (ph -> (ps <-> ch))
6 iftrue 2364 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> if(ph, B, D) = B)
76eqcomd 1479 . . . 4 |- (ph -> B = if(ph, B, D))
8 dedth2v.2 . . . 4 |- (B = if(ph, B, D) -> (ch <-> th))
97, 8syl 10 . . 3 |- (ph -> (ch <-> th))
105, 9bitrd 527 . 2 |- (ph -> (ps <-> th))
111, 10mpbiri 194 1 |- (ph -> ps)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146   = wceq 955  ifcif 2359
This theorem is referenced by:  bcpasc2t 6936  climuni 7067  hlimuni 9097  omls 9234  osumlem8 9575  pjfot 9642  ghomgrplem 10380
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 961  ax-gen 962  ax-8 963  ax-10 965  ax-12 967  ax-17 970  ax-4 972  ax-5o 974  ax-6o 977  ax-9o 1122  ax-10o 1139  ax-16 1210  ax-11o 1218  ax-ext 1459
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-or 224  df-an 225  df-ex 980  df-sb 1172  df-clab 1464  df-cleq 1469  df-clel 1472  df-if 2360
Copyright terms: Public domain