HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem dedth3v 2385
Description: Weak deduction theorem for eliminating a hypothesis with 3 class variables. See comments in dedth2v 2384.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
dedth3v.1 |- (A = if(ph, A, D) -> (ps <-> ch))
dedth3v.2 |- (B = if(ph, B, R) -> (ch <-> th))
dedth3v.3 |- (C = if(ph, C, S) -> (th <-> ta))
dedth3v.4 |- ta
Assertion
Ref Expression
dedth3v |- (ph -> ps)

Proof of Theorem dedth3v
StepHypRef Expression
1 dedth3v.4 . 2 |- ta
2 iftrue 2366 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> if(ph, A, D) = A)
32eqcomd 1480 . . . 4 |- (ph -> A = if(ph, A, D))
4 dedth3v.1 . . . 4 |- (A = if(ph, A, D) -> (ps <-> ch))
53, 4syl 10 . . 3 |- (ph -> (ps <-> ch))
6 iftrue 2366 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> if(ph, B, R) = B)
76eqcomd 1480 . . . 4 |- (ph -> B = if(ph, B, R))
8 dedth3v.2 . . . 4 |- (B = if(ph, B, R) -> (ch <-> th))
97, 8syl 10 . . 3 |- (ph -> (ch <-> th))
10 iftrue 2366 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> if(ph, C, S) = C)
1110eqcomd 1480 . . . 4 |- (ph -> C = if(ph, C, S))
12 dedth3v.3 . . . 4 |- (C = if(ph, C, S) -> (th <-> ta))
1311, 12syl 10 . . 3 |- (ph -> (th <-> ta))
145, 9, 133bitrd 544 . 2 |- (ph -> (ps <-> ta))
151, 14mpbiri 194 1 |- (ph -> ps)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146   = wceq 956  ifcif 2361
This theorem is referenced by:  projlem7 9192
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 962  ax-gen 963  ax-8 964  ax-10 966  ax-12 968  ax-17 971  ax-4 973  ax-5o 975  ax-6o 978  ax-9o 1123  ax-10o 1140  ax-16 1210  ax-11o 1218  ax-ext 1459
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-or 224  df-an 225  df-ex 981  df-sb 1172  df-clab 1464  df-cleq 1469  df-clel 1472  df-if 2362
Copyright terms: Public domain