HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem dfss2f 2056
Description: Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
dfss2f.1 |- (y e. A -> A.x y e. A)
dfss2f.2 |- (y e. B -> A.x y e. B)
Assertion
Ref Expression
dfss2f |- (A (_ B <-> A.x(x e. A -> x e. B))
Distinct variable groups:   y,A   y,B   x,y

Proof of Theorem dfss2f
StepHypRef Expression
1 dfss2 2054 . 2 |- (A (_ B <-> A.y(y e. A -> y e. B))
2 ax-17 969 . . 3 |- ((x e. A -> x e. B) -> A.y(x e. A -> x e. B))
3 dfss2f.1 . . . 4 |- (y e. A -> A.x y e. A)
4 dfss2f.2 . . . 4 |- (y e. B -> A.x y e. B)
53, 4hbim 1005 . . 3 |- ((y e. A -> y e. B) -> A.x(y e. A -> y e. B))
6 eleq1 1531 . . . 4 |- (x = y -> (x e. A <-> y e. A))
7 eleq1 1531 . . . 4 |- (x = y -> (x e. B <-> y e. B))
86, 7imbi12d 625 . . 3 |- (x = y -> ((x e. A -> x e. B) <-> (y e. A -> y e. B)))
92, 5, 8cbval 1163 . 2 |- (A.x(x e. A -> x e. B) <-> A.y(y e. A -> y e. B))
101, 9bitr4 176 1 |- (A (_ B <-> A.x(x e. A -> x e. B))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146  A.wal 952   = wceq 954   e. wcel 956   (_ wss 2043
This theorem is referenced by:  dfss3f 2057  hbss 2058  ss2ab 2112  fopab2 3814  iunon 3900  iinon 3901  rankval4 4682  scott0 4697
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 960  ax-gen 961  ax-8 962  ax-10 964  ax-12 966  ax-17 969  ax-4 971  ax-5o 973  ax-6o 976  ax-9o 1121  ax-10o 1138  ax-16 1208  ax-11o 1216  ax-ext 1457
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 979  df-sb 1170  df-clab 1462  df-cleq 1467  df-clel 1470  df-in 2047  df-ss 2049
Copyright terms: Public domain