Theorem dvelimdf 1246

Description: Deduction form of dvelimf 1245. This version may be useful if we want to avoid ax-17 968 and use ax-16 1206 instead.

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dvelimdf.1	|- (ph -> A.xph)
dvelimdf.2	|- (ph -> A.zph)
dvelimdf.3	|- (ph -> (ps -> A.xps))
dvelimdf.4	|- (ph -> (ch -> A.zch))
dvelimdf.5	|- (ph -> (z = y -> (ps <-> ch)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dvelimdf	|- (ph -> (-. A.x x = y -> (ch -> A.xch)))

Proof of Theorem dvelimdf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dvelimdf.2	. . . . . 6 |- (ph -> A.zph)
2		dvelimdf.1	. . . . . 6 |- (ph -> A.xph)
3	1, 2	19.21ai 995	. . . . 5 |- (ph -> A.zA.xph)
4		dvelimdf.3	. . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (ps -> A.xps))
5	4	19.20i2 990	. . . . 5 |- (A.zA.xph -> A.zA.x(ps -> A.xps))
6		hbsb4t 1244	. . . . 5 |- (A.zA.x(ps -> A.xps) -> (-. A.x x = y -> ([y / z]ps -> A.x[y / z]ps)))
7	3, 5, 6	3syl 20	. . . 4 |- (ph -> (-. A.x x = y -> ([y / z]ps -> A.x[y / z]ps)))
8	7	imp 350	. . 3 |- ((ph /\ -. A.x x = y) -> ([y / z]ps -> A.x[y / z]ps))
9		dvelimdf.4	. . . . 5 |- (ph -> (ch -> A.zch))
10		dvelimdf.5	. . . . 5 |- (ph -> (z = y -> (ps <-> ch)))
11	1, 9, 10	sbied 1191	. . . 4 |- (ph -> ([y / z]ps <-> ch))
12	11	adantr 389	. . 3 |- ((ph /\ -. A.x x = y) -> ([y / z]ps <-> ch))
13	2, 11	albid 1100	. . . 4 |- (ph -> (A.x[y / z]ps <-> A.xch))
14	13	adantr 389	. . 3 |- ((ph /\ -. A.x x = y) -> (A.x[y / z]ps <-> A.xch))
15	8, 12, 14	3imtr3d 540	. 2 |- ((ph /\ -. A.x x = y) -> (ch -> A.xch))
16	15	ex 373	1 |- (ph -> (-. A.x x = y -> (ch -> A.xch)))

Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146   /\ wa 223  A.wal 951   = wceq 953

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 959  ax-gen 960  ax-8 961  ax-10 963  ax-12 965  ax-4 970  ax-5o 972  ax-6o 975  ax-9o 1119  ax-10o 1136  ax-11o 1213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 978  df-sb 1168

Copyright terms: Public domain