HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem elabf 1892
Description: Membership in a class abstraction with implicit substitution.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
elabf.1 |- (ps -> A.xps)
elabf.2 |- A e. V
elabf.3 |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))
Assertion
Ref Expression
elabf |- (A e. {x | ph} <-> ps)
Distinct variable group:   x,A

Proof of Theorem elabf
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-17 969 . . . 4 |- (y e. A -> A.x y e. A)
2 hbab1 1464 . . . 4 |- (y e. {x | ph} -> A.x y e. {x | ph})
31, 2hbel 1563 . . 3 |- (A e. {x | ph} -> A.x A e. {x | ph})
4 elabf.1 . . 3 |- (ps -> A.xps)
53, 4hbbi 1008 . 2 |- ((A e. {x | ph} <-> ps) -> A.x(A e. {x | ph} <-> ps))
6 elabf.2 . 2 |- A e. V
7 eleq1 1531 . . . 4 |- (x = A -> (x e. {x | ph} <-> A e. {x | ph}))
8 abid 1463 . . . 4 |- (x e. {x | ph} <-> ph)
97, 8syl5bbr 533 . . 3 |- (x = A -> (ph <-> A e. {x | ph}))
10 elabf.3 . . 3 |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))
119, 10bitr3d 529 . 2 |- (x = A -> (A e. {x | ph} <-> ps))
125, 6, 11vtoclef 1853 1 |- (A e. {x | ph} <-> ps)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146  A.wal 952   = wceq 954   e. wcel 956  {cab 1461  Vcvv 1807
This theorem is referenced by:  elab 1893  cbvab 1904  qusp 10466
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 960  ax-gen 961  ax-10 964  ax-12 966  ax-17 969  ax-4 971  ax-5o 973  ax-6o 976  ax-9o 1121  ax-10o 1138  ax-16 1208  ax-11o 1216  ax-ext 1457
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 979  df-sb 1170  df-clab 1462  df-cleq 1467  df-clel 1470  df-v 1808
Copyright terms: Public domain