| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Eliminate a mapping
hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 2381,
when a special case |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf.1 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | feq1 3617 |
. 2
| |
| 2 | feq1 3617 |
. 2
| |
| 3 | elimf.1 |
. 2
| |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 2388 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: ruclem39 7527 bcth 8015 ubthi 8528 hosubclt 9690 hoaddcomt 9691 hoaddasst 9699 hocsubdirt 9702 hoaddid1t 9708 hodidt 9709 ho0subt 9714 honegsubt 9716 hoddit 9906 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-7 961 ax-gen 962 ax-8 963 ax-10 965 ax-11 966 ax-12 967 ax-13 968 ax-14 969 ax-17 970 ax-4 972 ax-5o 974 ax-6o 977 ax-9o 1122 ax-10o 1139 ax-16 1210 ax-11o 1218 ax-ext 1459 ax-sep 2700 ax-pow 2739 ax-pr 2776 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-or 224 df-an 225 df-ex 980 df-sb 1172 df-eu 1382 df-mo 1383 df-clab 1464 df-cleq 1469 df-clel 1472 df-ne 1586 df-v 1810 df-dif 2047 df-un 2048 df-in 2049 df-ss 2051 df-nul 2279 df-if 2360 df-pw 2400 df-sn 2410 df-pr 2411 df-op 2414 df-br 2617 df-opab 2664 df-id 2832 df-rel 3182 df-cnv 3183 df-co 3184 df-dm 3185 df-rn 3186 df-fun 3189 df-fn 3190 df-f 3191 |