HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem elintab 2539
Description: Membership in the intersection of a class abstraction.
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
inteqab.1 |- A e. V
Assertion
Ref Expression
elintab |- (A e. |^|{x | ph} <-> A.x(ph -> A e. x))
Distinct variable group:   x,A

Proof of Theorem elintab
StepHypRef Expression
1 inteqab.1 . . 3 |- A e. V
21elint 2534 . 2 |- (A e. |^|{x | ph} <-> A.y(y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y))
3 hbab1 1464 . . . 4 |- (y e. {x | ph} -> A.x y e. {x | ph})
4 ax-17 969 . . . 4 |- (A e. y -> A.x A e. y)
53, 4hbim 1005 . . 3 |- ((y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y) -> A.x(y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y))
6 ax-17 969 . . 3 |- ((ph -> A e. x) -> A.y(ph -> A e. x))
7 eleq1 1531 . . . . 5 |- (y = x -> (y e. {x | ph} <-> x e. {x | ph}))
8 abid 1463 . . . . 5 |- (x e. {x | ph} <-> ph)
97, 8syl6bb 535 . . . 4 |- (y = x -> (y e. {x | ph} <-> ph))
10 eleq2 1532 . . . 4 |- (y = x -> (A e. y <-> A e. x))
119, 10imbi12d 625 . . 3 |- (y = x -> ((y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y) <-> (ph -> A e. x)))
125, 6, 11cbval 1163 . 2 |- (A.y(y e. {x | ph} -> A e. y) <-> A.x(ph -> A e. x))
132, 12bitr 173 1 |- (A e. |^|{x | ph} <-> A.x(ph -> A e. x))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146  A.wal 952   = wceq 954   e. wcel 956  {cab 1461  Vcvv 1807  |^|cint 2528
This theorem is referenced by:  elintrab 2540  intmin4 2554  intab 2555  dfom3 4610  1nn 5890  peano2nn 5891  dfuz 6158
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 960  ax-gen 961  ax-8 962  ax-10 964  ax-12 966  ax-17 969  ax-4 971  ax-5o 973  ax-6o 976  ax-9o 1121  ax-10o 1138  ax-16 1208  ax-11o 1216  ax-ext 1457
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 979  df-sb 1170  df-clab 1462  df-cleq 1467  df-clel 1470  df-v 1808  df-int 2529
Copyright terms: Public domain