HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem elsuci 3039
Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either A or B be sets.
Assertion
Ref Expression
elsuci |- (A e. suc B -> (A e. B \/ A = B))

Proof of Theorem elsuci
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-suc 2981 . . . 4 |- suc B = (B u. {B})
21eleq2i 1581 . . 3 |- (A e. suc B <-> A e. (B u. {B}))
3 elun 2225 . . 3 |- (A e. (B u. {B}) <-> (A e. B \/ A e. {B}))
42, 3bitri 171 . 2 |- (A e. suc B <-> (A e. B \/ A e. {B}))
5 elsni 2493 . . 3 |- (A e. {B} -> A = B)
65orim2i 336 . 2 |- ((A e. B \/ A e. {B}) -> (A e. B \/ A = B))
74, 6sylbi 197 1 |- (A e. suc B -> (A e. B \/ A = B))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   \/ wo 220   = wceq 992   e. wcel 994   u. cun 2097  {csn 2467  suc csuc 2977
This theorem is referenced by:  trsucss 3057  ordnbtwn 3062  suc11 3073  tfrlem11 4222  omordi 4333  phplem3 4657  pssnn 4681  cfsuc 5065  indpi 5188  elsucii 12212
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 998  ax-gen 999  ax-8 1000  ax-10 1002  ax-12 1004  ax-17 1007  ax-4 1009  ax-5o 1011  ax-6o 1014  ax-9o 1159  ax-10o 1177  ax-16 1247  ax-11o 1255  ax-ext 1500
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 145  df-or 222  df-an 223  df-ex 1017  df-sb 1209  df-clab 1506  df-cleq 1511  df-clel 1514  df-v 1858  df-un 2102  df-sn 2470  df-pr 2471  df-suc 2981
Copyright terms: Public domain