MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  findes Unicode version

Theorem findes 4686
Description: Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction hypothesis. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. See tfindes 4653 for the transfinite version. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
findes.1  |-  [. (/)  /  x ]. ph
findes.2  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph ) )
Assertion
Ref Expression
findes  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ph )

Proof of Theorem findes
Dummy variables  y 
z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 dfsbcq2 2994 . 2  |-  ( z  =  (/)  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph 
<-> 
[. (/)  /  x ]. ph ) )
2 sbequ 2000 . 2  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [ y  /  x ] ph ) )
3 dfsbcq2 2994 . 2  |-  ( z  =  suc  y  -> 
( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
4 sbequ12r 1861 . 2  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  ph ) )
5 findes.1 . 2  |-  [. (/)  /  x ]. ph
6 nfv 1605 . . . 4  |-  F/ x  y  e.  om
7 nfs1v 2045 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x [ y  /  x ] ph
8 nfsbc1v 3010 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph
97, 8nfim 1769 . . . 4  |-  F/ x
( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
106, 9nfim 1769 . . 3  |-  F/ x
( y  e.  om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
11 eleq1 2343 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
x  e.  om  <->  y  e.  om ) )
12 sbequ12 1860 . . . . 5  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph 
<->  [ y  /  x ] ph ) )
13 suceq 4457 . . . . . 6  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  suc  x  =  suc  y )
14 dfsbcq 2993 . . . . . 6  |-  ( suc  x  =  suc  y  ->  ( [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
1513, 14syl 15 . . . . 5  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph ) )
1612, 15imbi12d 311 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph )  <->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
) )
1711, 16imbi12d 311 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph )
)  <->  ( y  e. 
om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph ) ) ) )
18 findes.2 . . 3  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph ) )
1910, 17, 18chvar 1926 . 2  |-  ( y  e.  om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
201, 2, 3, 4, 5, 19finds 4682 1  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ph )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    <-> wb 176    = wceq 1623   [wsb 1629    e. wcel 1684   [.wsbc 2991   (/)c0 3455   suc csuc 4394   omcom 4656
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1533  ax-5 1544  ax-17 1603  ax-9 1635  ax-8 1643  ax-13 1686  ax-14 1688  ax-6 1703  ax-7 1708  ax-11 1715  ax-12 1866  ax-ext 2264  ax-sep 4141  ax-nul 4149  ax-pr 4214  ax-un 4512
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-3or 935  df-3an 936  df-tru 1310  df-ex 1529  df-nf 1532  df-sb 1630  df-eu 2147  df-mo 2148  df-clab 2270  df-cleq 2276  df-clel 2279  df-nfc 2408  df-ne 2448  df-ral 2548  df-rex 2549  df-rab 2552  df-v 2790  df-sbc 2992  df-dif 3155  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pss 3168  df-nul 3456  df-if 3566  df-pw 3627  df-sn 3646  df-pr 3647  df-tp 3648  df-op 3649  df-uni 3828  df-br 4024  df-opab 4078  df-tr 4114  df-eprel 4305  df-po 4314  df-so 4315  df-fr 4352  df-we 4354  df-ord 4395  df-on 4396  df-lim 4397  df-suc 4398  df-om 4657
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator