MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  findes Unicode version

Theorem findes 4834
Description: Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction hypothesis. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. See tfindes 4801 for the transfinite version. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
findes.1  |-  [. (/)  /  x ]. ph
findes.2  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph ) )
Assertion
Ref Expression
findes  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ph )

Proof of Theorem findes
Dummy variables  y 
z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 dfsbcq2 3124 . 2  |-  ( z  =  (/)  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph 
<-> 
[. (/)  /  x ]. ph ) )
2 sbequ 2109 . 2  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [ y  /  x ] ph ) )
3 dfsbcq2 3124 . 2  |-  ( z  =  suc  y  -> 
( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
4 sbequ12r 1941 . 2  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  ph ) )
5 findes.1 . 2  |-  [. (/)  /  x ]. ph
6 nfv 1626 . . . 4  |-  F/ x  y  e.  om
7 nfs1v 2155 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x [ y  /  x ] ph
8 nfsbc1v 3140 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph
97, 8nfim 1828 . . . 4  |-  F/ x
( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
106, 9nfim 1828 . . 3  |-  F/ x
( y  e.  om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
11 eleq1 2464 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
x  e.  om  <->  y  e.  om ) )
12 sbequ12 1940 . . . . 5  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph 
<->  [ y  /  x ] ph ) )
13 suceq 4606 . . . . . 6  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  suc  x  =  suc  y )
14 dfsbcq 3123 . . . . . 6  |-  ( suc  x  =  suc  y  ->  ( [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
1513, 14syl 16 . . . . 5  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph ) )
1612, 15imbi12d 312 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph )  <->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
) )
1711, 16imbi12d 312 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph )
)  <->  ( y  e. 
om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph ) ) ) )
18 findes.2 . . 3  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph ) )
1910, 17, 18chvar 2039 . 2  |-  ( y  e.  om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
201, 2, 3, 4, 5, 19finds 4830 1  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ph )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    <-> wb 177    = wceq 1649   [wsb 1655    e. wcel 1721   [.wsbc 3121   (/)c0 3588   suc csuc 4543   omcom 4804
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1552  ax-5 1563  ax-17 1623  ax-9 1662  ax-8 1683  ax-13 1723  ax-14 1725  ax-6 1740  ax-7 1745  ax-11 1757  ax-12 1946  ax-ext 2385  ax-sep 4290  ax-nul 4298  ax-pr 4363  ax-un 4660
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 178  df-or 360  df-an 361  df-3or 937  df-3an 938  df-tru 1325  df-ex 1548  df-nf 1551  df-sb 1656  df-eu 2258  df-mo 2259  df-clab 2391  df-cleq 2397  df-clel 2400  df-nfc 2529  df-ne 2569  df-ral 2671  df-rex 2672  df-rab 2675  df-v 2918  df-sbc 3122  df-dif 3283  df-un 3285  df-in 3287  df-ss 3294  df-pss 3296  df-nul 3589  df-if 3700  df-pw 3761  df-sn 3780  df-pr 3781  df-tp 3782  df-op 3783  df-uni 3976  df-br 4173  df-opab 4227  df-tr 4263  df-eprel 4454  df-po 4463  df-so 4464  df-fr 4501  df-we 4503  df-ord 4544  df-on 4545  df-lim 4546  df-suc 4547  df-om 4805
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator