MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  findes Unicode version

Theorem findes 4686
Description: Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction hypothesis. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. See tfindes 4653 for the transfinite version. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
findes.1  |-  [. (/)  /  x ]. ph
findes.2  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph ) )
Assertion
Ref Expression
findes  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ph )
Dummy variables  y 
z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Proof of Theorem findes
StepHypRef Expression
1 dfsbcq2 2996 . 2  |-  ( z  =  (/)  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph 
<-> 
[. (/)  /  x ]. ph ) )
2 sbequ 2000 . 2  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [ y  /  x ] ph ) )
3 dfsbcq2 2996 . 2  |-  ( z  =  suc  y  -> 
( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
4 sbequ12r 1863 . 2  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  ph ) )
5 findes.1 . 2  |-  [. (/)  /  x ]. ph
6 nfv 1606 . . . 4  |-  F/ x  y  e.  om
7 nfs1v 2046 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x [ y  /  x ] ph
8 nfsbc1v 3012 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph
97, 8nfim 1771 . . . 4  |-  F/ x
( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
106, 9nfim 1771 . . 3  |-  F/ x
( y  e.  om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
11 eleq1 2345 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
x  e.  om  <->  y  e.  om ) )
12 sbequ12 1862 . . . . 5  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph 
<->  [ y  /  x ] ph ) )
13 suceq 4457 . . . . . 6  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  suc  x  =  suc  y )
14 dfsbcq 2995 . . . . . 6  |-  ( suc  x  =  suc  y  ->  ( [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
1513, 14syl 17 . . . . 5  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph ) )
1612, 15imbi12d 313 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph )  <->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
) )
1711, 16imbi12d 313 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph )
)  <->  ( y  e. 
om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph ) ) ) )
18 findes.2 . . 3  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph ) )
1910, 17, 18chvar 1929 . 2  |-  ( y  e.  om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
201, 2, 3, 4, 5, 19finds 4682 1  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ph )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 6    <-> wb 178    = wceq 1624   [wsb 1631    e. wcel 1685   [.wsbc 2993   (/)c0 3457   suc csuc 4394   omcom 4656
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 7  ax-2 8  ax-3 9  ax-mp 10  ax-gen 1534  ax-5 1545  ax-17 1604  ax-9 1637  ax-8 1645  ax-13 1687  ax-14 1689  ax-6 1704  ax-7 1709  ax-11 1716  ax-12 1868  ax-ext 2266  ax-sep 4143  ax-nul 4151  ax-pr 4214  ax-un 4512
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 179  df-or 361  df-an 362  df-3or 937  df-3an 938  df-tru 1312  df-ex 1530  df-nf 1533  df-sb 1632  df-eu 2149  df-mo 2150  df-clab 2272  df-cleq 2278  df-clel 2281  df-nfc 2410  df-ne 2450  df-ral 2550  df-rex 2551  df-rab 2554  df-v 2792  df-sbc 2994  df-dif 3157  df-un 3159  df-in 3161  df-ss 3168  df-pss 3170  df-nul 3458  df-if 3568  df-pw 3629  df-sn 3648  df-pr 3649  df-tp 3650  df-op 3651  df-uni 3830  df-br 4026  df-opab 4080  df-tr 4116  df-eprel 4305  df-po 4314  df-so 4315  df-fr 4352  df-we 4354  df-ord 4395  df-on 4396  df-lim 4397  df-suc 4398  df-om 4657
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator