HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem hboprd 3973
Description: Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder hbopr 3972.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
hboprd.1 |- (ph -> A.xph)
hboprd.2 |- (ph -> (y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
hboprd.3 |- (ph -> (y e. F -> A.x y e. F))
hboprd.4 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> A.x y e. B))
Assertion
Ref Expression
hboprd |- (ph -> (y e. (AFB) -> A.x y e. (AFB)))
Distinct variable groups:   y,A   y,B   y,F   x,y   ph,y

Proof of Theorem hboprd
StepHypRef Expression
1 hba1 1001 . . . . 5 |- (A.x z e. A -> A.xA.x z e. A)
21hbab 1465 . . . 4 |- (y e. {z | A.x z e. A} -> A.x y e. {z | A.x z e. A})
3 hba1 1001 . . . . 5 |- (A.x z e. F -> A.xA.x z e. F)
43hbab 1465 . . . 4 |- (y e. {z | A.x z e. F} -> A.x y e. {z | A.x z e. F})
5 hba1 1001 . . . . 5 |- (A.x z e. B -> A.xA.x z e. B)
65hbab 1465 . . . 4 |- (y e. {z | A.x z e. B} -> A.x y e. {z | A.x z e. B})
72, 4, 6hbopr 3972 . . 3 |- (y e. ({z | A.x z e. A}{z | A.x z e. F}{z | A.x z e. B}) -> A.x y e. ({z | A.x z e. A}{z | A.x z e. F}{z | A.x z e. B}))
87a1i 8 . 2 |- (ph -> (y e. ({z | A.x z e. A}{z | A.x z e. F}{z | A.x z e. B}) -> A.x y e. ({z | A.x z e. A}{z | A.x z e. F}{z | A.x z e. B})))
9 hboprd.2 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
10919.21aiv 1284 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> A.y(y e. A -> A.x y e. A))
11 abidhb 1908 . . . . . 6 |- (A.y(y e. A -> A.x y e. A) -> {z | A.x z e. A} = A)
1210, 11syl 10 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> {z | A.x z e. A} = A)
13 hboprd.4 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> A.x y e. B))
141319.21aiv 1284 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> A.y(y e. B -> A.x y e. B))
15 abidhb 1908 . . . . . 6 |- (A.y(y e. B -> A.x y e. B) -> {z | A.x z e. B} = B)
1614, 15syl 10 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> {z | A.x z e. B} = B)
1712, 16opreq12d 3969 . . . 4 |- (ph -> ({z | A.x z e. A}{z | A.x z e. F}{z | A.x z e. B}) = (A{z | A.x z e. F}B))
18 hboprd.3 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (y e. F -> A.x y e. F))
191819.21aiv 1284 . . . . 5 |- (ph -> A.y(y e. F -> A.x y e. F))
20 abidhb 1908 . . . . 5 |- (A.y(y e. F -> A.x y e. F) -> {z | A.x z e. F} = F)
21 opreq 3958 . . . . 5 |- ({z | A.x z e. F} = F -> (A{z | A.x z e. F}B) = (AFB))
2219, 20, 213syl 20 . . . 4 |- (ph -> (A{z | A.x z e. F}B) = (AFB))
2317, 22eqtrd 1504 . . 3 |- (ph -> ({z | A.x z e. A}{z | A.x z e. F}{z | A.x z e. B}) = (AFB))
2423eleq2d 1538 . 2 |- (ph -> (y e. ({z | A.x z e. A}{z | A.x z e. F}{z | A.x z e. B}) <-> y e. (AFB)))
25 hboprd.1 . . 3 |- (ph -> A.xph)
2625, 24albid 1102 . 2 |- (ph -> (A.x y e. ({z | A.x z e. A}{z | A.x z e. F}{z | A.x z e. B}) <-> A.x y e. (AFB)))
278, 24, 263imtr3d 541 1 |- (ph -> (y e. (AFB) -> A.x y e. (AFB)))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3  A.wal 952   = wceq 954   e. wcel 956  {cab 1461  (class class class)co 3954
This theorem is referenced by:  csboprg 3977
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 960  ax-gen 961  ax-8 962  ax-10 964  ax-11 965  ax-12 966  ax-13 967  ax-14 968  ax-17 969  ax-4 971  ax-5o 973  ax-6o 976  ax-9o 1121  ax-10o 1138  ax-16 1208  ax-11o 1216  ax-ext 1457  ax-sep 2698  ax-pow 2737  ax-pr 2774
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-or 224  df-an 225  df-ex 979  df-sb 1170  df-eu 1380  df-mo 1381  df-clab 1462  df-cleq 1467  df-clel 1470  df-ne 1584  df-rex 1647  df-v 1808  df-dif 2045  df-un 2046  df-in 2047  df-ss 2049  df-nul 2277  df-pw 2398  df-sn 2408  df-pr 2409  df-op 2412  df-uni 2499  df-br 2615  df-opab 2662  df-xp 3179  df-cnv 3181  df-dm 3183  df-rn 3184  df-res 3185  df-ima 3186  df-fv 3193  df-opr 3956
Copyright terms: Public domain