HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem hbrab 1770
Description: A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
hbrab.1 |- (ph -> A.xph)
hbrab.2 |- (z e. A -> A.x z e. A)
Assertion
Ref Expression
hbrab |- (z e. {y e. A | ph} -> A.x z e. {y e. A | ph})
Distinct variable groups:   x,y,z   z,A

Proof of Theorem hbrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rab 1649 . 2 |- {y e. A | ph} = {y | (y e. A /\ ph)}
2 ax-17 969 . . . . 5 |- (z e. y -> A.x z e. y)
3 hbrab.2 . . . . 5 |- (z e. A -> A.x z e. A)
42, 3hbel 1563 . . . 4 |- (y e. A -> A.x y e. A)
5 hbrab.1 . . . 4 |- (ph -> A.xph)
64, 5hban 1007 . . 3 |- ((y e. A /\ ph) -> A.x(y e. A /\ ph))
76hbab 1465 . 2 |- (z e. {y | (y e. A /\ ph)} -> A.x z e. {y | (y e. A /\ ph)})
81, 7hbxfr 1560 1 |- (z e. {y e. A | ph} -> A.x z e. {y e. A | ph})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3   /\ wa 223  A.wal 952   e. wcel 956  {cab 1461  {crab 1645
This theorem is referenced by:  scottex 4696  lble 6002  fgsb 10480  fgsb2 10485
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-7 960  ax-gen 961  ax-8 962  ax-10 964  ax-12 966  ax-17 969  ax-4 971  ax-5o 973  ax-6o 976  ax-9o 1121  ax-10o 1138  ax-16 1208  ax-11o 1216  ax-ext 1457
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-an 225  df-ex 979  df-sb 1170  df-clab 1462  df-cleq 1467  df-clel 1470  df-rab 1649
Copyright terms: Public domain