MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  inf3 Unicode version

Theorem inf3 7332
Description: Our Axiom of Infinity ax-inf 7335 implies the standard Axiom of Infinity. The hypothesis is a variant of our Axiom of Infinity provided by inf2 7320, and the conclusion is the version of the Axiom of Infinity shown as Axiom 7 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Other standard versions are proved later as axinf2 7337 and zfinf2 7339.) The main proof is provided by inf3lema 7321 through inf3lem7 7331, and this final piece eliminates the auxiliary hypothesis of inf3lem7 7331. This proof is due to Ian Sutherland, Richard Heck, and Norman Megill and was posted on Usenet as shown below. Although the result is not new, the authors were unable to find a published proof.
       (As posted to sci.logic on 30-Oct-1996, with annotations added.)

       Theorem:  The statement "There exists a non-empty set that is a subset
       of its union" implies the Axiom of Infinity.

       Proof:  Let X be a nonempty set which is a subset of its union; the
       latter
       property is equivalent to saying that for any y in X, there exists a z
       in X
       such that y is in z.

       Define by finite recursion a function F:omega-->(power X) such that
       F_0 = 0  (See inf3lemb 7322.)
       F_n+1 = {y<X | y^X subset F_n}  (See inf3lemc 7323.)
       Note: ^ means intersect, < means \in ("element of").
       (Finite recursion as typically done requires the existence of omega;
       to avoid this we can just use transfinite recursion restricted to omega.
       F is a class-term that is not necessarily a set at this point.)

       Lemma 1.  F_n subset F_n+1.  (See inf3lem1 7325.)
       Proof:  By induction:  F_0 subset F_1.  If y < F_n+1, then y^X subset
       F_n,
       so if F_n subset F_n+1, then y^X subset F_n+1, so y < F_n+2.

       Lemma 2.  F_n =/= X.  (See inf3lem2 7326.)
       Proof:  By induction:  F_0 =/= X because X is not empty.  Assume F_n =/=
       X.
       Then there is a y in X that is not in F_n.  By definition of X, there is
       a
       z in X that contains y.  Suppose F_n+1 = X.  Then z is in F_n+1, and z^X
       contains y, so z^X is not a subset of F_n, contrary to the definition of
       F_n+1.

       Lemma 3.  F_n =/= F_n+1.  (See inf3lem3 7327.)
       Proof:  Using the identity y^X subset F_n <-> y^(X-F_n) = 0, we have
       F_n+1 = {y<X | y^(X-F_n) = 0}.  Let q = {y<X-F_n | y^(X-F_n) = 0}.
       Then q subset F_n+1.  Since X-F_n is not empty by Lemma 2 and q is the
       set of \in-minimal elements of X-F_n, by Foundation q is not empty, so q
       and therefore F_n+1 have an element not in F_n.

       Lemma 4.  F_n proper_subset F_n+1.  (See inf3lem4 7328.)
       Proof:  Lemmas 1 and 3.

       Lemma 5.  F_m proper_subset F_n, m < n.  (See inf3lem5 7329.)
       Proof:  Fix m and use induction on n > m.  Basis: F_m proper_subset
       F_m+1
       by Lemma 4.  Induction:  Assume F_m proper_subset F_n.  Then since F_n
       proper_subset F_n+1, F_m proper_subset F_n+1 by transitivity of proper
       subset.

       By Lemma 5, F_m =/= F_n for m =/= n, so F is 1-1.  (See inf3lem6 7330.)
       Thus the inverse of F is a function with range omega and domain a subset
       of power X, so omega exists by Replacement.  (See inf3lem7 7331.)
       Q.E.D.
       
(Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
inf3.1  |-  E. x
( x  =/=  (/)  /\  x  C_ 
U. x )
Assertion
Ref Expression
inf3  |-  om  e.  _V

Proof of Theorem inf3
Dummy variables  y  w are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 inf3.1 . 2  |-  E. x
( x  =/=  (/)  /\  x  C_ 
U. x )
2 eqid 2284 . . . 4  |-  ( y  e.  _V  |->  { w  e.  x  |  (
w  i^i  x )  C_  y } )  =  ( y  e.  _V  |->  { w  e.  x  |  ( w  i^i  x )  C_  y } )
3 eqid 2284 . . . 4  |-  ( rec ( ( y  e. 
_V  |->  { w  e.  x  |  ( w  i^i  x )  C_  y } ) ,  (/) )  |`  om )  =  ( rec ( ( y  e.  _V  |->  { w  e.  x  |  ( w  i^i  x
)  C_  y }
) ,  (/) )  |`  om )
4 vex 2792 . . . 4  |-  x  e. 
_V
52, 3, 4, 4inf3lem7 7331 . . 3  |-  ( ( x  =/=  (/)  /\  x  C_ 
U. x )  ->  om  e.  _V )
65exlimiv 1667 . 2  |-  ( E. x ( x  =/=  (/)  /\  x  C_  U. x
)  ->  om  e.  _V )
71, 6ax-mp 8 1  |-  om  e.  _V
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 358   E.wex 1528    e. wcel 1685    =/= wne 2447   {crab 2548   _Vcvv 2789    i^i cin 3152    C_ wss 3153   (/)c0 3456   U.cuni 3828    e. cmpt 4078   omcom 4655    |` cres 4690   reccrdg 6418
This theorem is referenced by:  axinf2  7337
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8  ax-gen 1533  ax-5 1544  ax-17 1603  ax-9 1636  ax-8 1644  ax-13 1687  ax-14 1689  ax-6 1704  ax-7 1709  ax-11 1716  ax-12 1868  ax-ext 2265  ax-rep 4132  ax-sep 4142  ax-nul 4150  ax-pow 4187  ax-pr 4213  ax-un 4511  ax-reg 7302
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-3or 935  df-3an 936  df-tru 1310  df-ex 1529  df-nf 1532  df-sb 1631  df-eu 2148  df-mo 2149  df-clab 2271  df-cleq 2277  df-clel 2280  df-nfc 2409  df-ne 2449  df-ral 2549  df-rex 2550  df-reu 2551  df-rab 2553  df-v 2791  df-sbc 2993  df-csb 3083  df-dif 3156  df-un 3158  df-in 3160  df-ss 3167  df-pss 3169  df-nul 3457  df-if 3567  df-pw 3628  df-sn 3647  df-pr 3648  df-tp 3649  df-op 3650  df-uni 3829  df-iun 3908  df-br 4025  df-opab 4079  df-mpt 4080  df-tr 4115  df-eprel 4304  df-id 4308  df-po 4313  df-so 4314  df-fr 4351  df-we 4353  df-ord 4394  df-on 4395  df-lim 4396  df-suc 4397  df-om 4656  df-xp 4694  df-rel 4695  df-cnv 4696  df-co 4697  df-dm 4698  df-rn 4699  df-res 4700  df-ima 4701  df-fun 5223  df-fn 5224  df-f 5225  df-f1 5226  df-fo 5227  df-f1o 5228  df-fv 5229  df-recs 6384  df-rdg 6419
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator