HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer
Theorem List (p. 1 of 322)
< Previous  Next >
Browser slow? Try the
Unicode version.

Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  MPE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Color key:    Metamath Proof Explorer  Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-21498)
  Hilbert Space Explorer  Hilbert Space Explorer
(21499-23021)
  Users' Mathboxes  Users' Mathboxes
(23022-32154)
 

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 1-100   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
PART 1  CLASSICAL FIRST ORDER LOGIC WITH EQUALITY

Logic can be defined as the "study of the principles of correct reasoning" (Merrilee H. Salmon's 1991 "Informal Reasoning and Informal Logic" in Informal Reasoning and Education ) or as "a formal system using symbolic techniques and mathematical methods to establish truth-values" (the Oxford English Dictionary).

This section formally defines the logic system we will use. In particular, it defines symbols for declaring truthful statements, along with rules for deriving truthful statements from other truthful statements. The system defined here is classical first order logic with equality (the most common logic system used by mathematicians).

We begin with a few housekeeping items in pre-logic, and then introduce propositional calculus (both its axioms and important theorems that can be derived from them). Propositional calculus deals with general truths about well-formed formulas (wffs) regardless of how they are constructed. This is followed by proofs that other axiomatizations of classical propositional calculus can be derived from the axioms we have chosen to use.

We then define predicate calculus, which adds additional symbols and rules useful for discussing objects (beyond simply true or false). In particular it introduces the symbols  = ("equals"),  e. ("is a member of"), and  A. ("for all"). The first two are called "predicates." A predicate specifies a true or false relationship between its two arguments.

 
1.1  Pre-logic

This section includes a few "housekeeping" mechanisms before we begin defining the basics of logic.

 
1.1.1  Inferences for assisting proof development
 
Theoremdummylink 1 (Note: This inference rule and the next one, idi 2, will normally never appear in a completed proof. It can be ignored if you are using this database to assist learning logic - please start with the statement wn 3 instead.)

This is a technical inference to assist proof development. It provides a temporary way to add an independent subproof to a proof under development, for later assignment to a normal proof step.

The metamath program's Proof Assistant requires proofs to be developed backwards from the conclusion with no gaps, and it has no mechanism that lets the user to work on isolated subproofs. This inference provides a workaround for this limitation. It can be inserted at any point in a proof to allow an independent subproof to be developed on the side, for later use as part of the final proof.

Instructions: (1) Assign this inference to any unknown step in the proof. Typically, the last unknown step is the most convenient, since 'assign last' can be used. This step will be replicated in hypothesis dummylink.1, from where the development of the main proof can continue. (2) Develop the independent subproof backwards from hypothesis dummylink.2. If desired, use a 'let' command to pre-assign the conclusion of the independent subproof to dummylink.2. (3) After the independent subproof is complete, use 'improve all' to assign it automatically to an unknown step in the main proof that matches it. (4) After the entire proof is complete, use 'minimize *' to clean up (discard) all dummylink references automatically.

This inference was originally designed to assist importing partially completed Proof Worksheets from the mmj2 Proof Assistant GUI, but it can also be useful on its own. Interestingly, no axioms are required for its proof. (Contributed by NM?, 7-Feb-2006.)

 |-  ph   &    |- 
 ps   =>    |-  ph
 
Theoremidi 2 Inference form of id 19. This inference rule, which requires no axioms for its proof, is useful as a copy-paste mechanism during proof development in mmj2. It is normally not referenced in the final version of a proof, since it is always redundant and can be removed using the 'minimize *' command in the metamath program's Proof Assistant. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
 |-  ph   =>    |-  ph
 
1.2  Propositional calculus

Propositional calculus deals with general truths about well-formed formulas (wffs) regardless of how they are constructed. The simplest propositional truth is  ( ph  ->  ph ), which can be read "if something is true, then it is true" - rather trivial and obvious, but nonetheless it must be proved from the axioms (see theorem id 19).

Our system of propositional calculus consists of three basic axioms and another axiom that defines the modus-ponens inference rule. It is attributed to Jan Lukasiewicz (pronounced woo-kah-SHAY-vitch) and was popularized by Alonzo Church, who called it system P2. (Thanks to Ted Ulrich for this information.) These axioms are ax-1 5, ax-2 6, ax-3 7, and (for modus ponens) ax-mp 8. Some closely followed texts include [Margaris] for the axioms and [WhiteheadRussell] for the theorems.

The propositional calculus used here is the classical system widely used by mathematicians. In particular, this logic system accepts the "law of the excluded middle" as proven in exmid 404, which says that a logical statement is either true or not true. This is an essential distinction of classical logic and is not a theorem of intuitionistic logic.

All 194 axioms, definitions, and theorems for propositional calculus in Principia Mathematica (specifically *1.2 through *5.75) are axioms or formally proven. See the Bibliographic Cross-References at http://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mmbiblio.html for a complete cross-reference from sources used to its formalization in the Metamath Proof Explorer.

 
1.2.1  Recursively define primitive wffs for propositional calculus
 
Syntaxwn 3 If  ph is a wff, so is  -.  ph or "not  ph." Part of the recursive definition of a wff (well-formed formula). In classical logic (which is our logic), a wff is interpreted as either true or false. So if  ph is true, then  -.  ph is false; if  ph is false, then  -.  ph is true. Traditionally, Greek letters are used to represent wffs, and we follow this convention. In propositional calculus, we define only wffs built up from other wffs, i.e. there is no starting or "atomic" wff. Later, in predicate calculus, we will extend the basic wff definition by including atomic wffs (weq 1624 and wel 1685).
 wff  -.  ph
 
Syntaxwi 4 If  ph and  ps are wff's, so is  ( ph  ->  ps ) or " ph implies  ps." Part of the recursive definition of a wff. The resulting wff is (interpreted as) false when  ph is true and 
ps is false; it is true otherwise. Think of the truth table for an OR gate with input  ph connected through an inverter. After we define the axioms of propositional calculus (ax-1 5, ax-2 6, ax-3 7, and ax-mp 8), the biconditional (df-bi 177), the constant true  T. (df-tru 1310), and the constant false  F. (df-fal 1311), we will be able to prove these truth table values:  ( (  T. 
->  T.  )  <->  T.  ) (truimtru 1334),  ( (  T.  ->  F.  )  <->  F.  ) (truimfal 1335), 
( (  F.  ->  T.  )  <->  T.  ) (falimtru 1336), and  ( (  F.  ->  F.  )  <->  T.  ) (falimfal 1337). These have straightforward meanings, for example,  ( (  T.  ->  T.  ) 
<->  T.  ) just means "the value of 
T.  ->  T. is  T.".

The left-hand wff is called the antecedent, and the right-hand wff is called the consequent. In the case of  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ), the middle  ps may be informally called either an antecedent or part of the consequent depending on context. Contrast with  <-> (df-bi 177),  /\ (df-an 360), and  \/ (df-or 359).

This is called "material implication" and the arrow is usually read as "implies." However, material implication is not identical to the meaning of "implies" in natural language. For example, the word "implies" may suggest a causal relationship in natural language. Material implication does not require any causal relationship. Also note that in material implication, if the consequent is true then the wff is always true (even if the antecedent is false). Thus, if "implies" means material implication, it is true that "if the moon is made of green cheese that implies that 5=5" (because 5=5). Similarly, if the antecedent is false, the wff is always true. Thus, it is true that, "if the moon made of green cheese that implies that 5=7" (because the moon is not actually made of green cheese). A contradiction implies anything (pm2.21i 123). In short, material implication has a very specific technical definition, and misunderstandings of it are sometimes called "paradoxes of logical implication."

 wff  ( ph  ->  ps )
 
1.2.2  The axioms of propositional calculus

Postulate the three axioms of classical propositional calculus.

Propositional calculus (axioms ax-1 5 through ax-3 7 and rule ax-mp 8) can be thought of as asserting formulas that are universally "true" when their variables are replaced by any combination of "true" and "false." Propositional calculus was first formalized by Frege in 1879, using as his axioms (in addition to rule ax-mp 8) the wffs ax-1 5, ax-2 6, pm2.04 76, con3 126, notnot2 104, and notnot1 114. Around 1930, Lukasiewicz simplified the system by eliminating the third (which follows from the first two, as you can see by looking at the proof of pm2.04 76) and replacing the last three with our ax-3 7. (Thanks to Ted Ulrich for this information.)

The theorems of propositional calculus are also called tautologies. Tautologies can be proved very simply using truth tables, based on the true/false interpretation of propositional calculus. To do this, we assign all possible combinations of true and false to the wff variables and verify that the result (using the rules described in wi 4 and wn 3) always evaluates to true. This is called the semantic approach. Our approach is called the syntactic approach, in which everything is derived from axioms. A metatheorem called the Completeness Theorem for Propositional Calculus shows that the two approaches are equivalent and even provides an algorithm for automatically generating syntactic proofs from a truth table. Those proofs, however, tend to be long, since truth tables grow exponentially with the number of variables, and the much shorter proofs that we show here were found manually.

 
Axiomax-1 5 Axiom Simp. Axiom A1 of [Margaris] p. 49. One of the 3 axioms of propositional calculus. The 3 axioms are also given as Definition 2.1 of [Hamilton] p. 28. This axiom is called Simp or "the principle of simplification" in Principia Mathematica (Theorem *2.02 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100) because "it enables us to pass from the joint assertion of  ph and  ps to the assertion of  ph simply." (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ph ) )
 
Axiomax-2 6 Axiom Frege. Axiom A2 of [Margaris] p. 49. One of the 3 axioms of propositional calculus. It "distributes" an antecedent over two consequents. This axiom was part of Frege's original system and is known as Frege in the literature. It is also proved as Theorem *2.77 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. The other direction of this axiom also turns out to be true, as demonstrated by pm5.41 353. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch )
 )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) ) )
 
Axiomax-3 7 Axiom Transp. Axiom A3 of [Margaris] p. 49. One of the 3 axioms of propositional calculus. It swaps or "transposes" the order of the consequents when negation is removed. An informal example is that the statement "if there are no clouds in the sky, it is not raining" implies the statement "if it is raining, there are clouds in the sky." This axiom is called Transp or "the principle of transposition" in Principia Mathematica (Theorem *2.17 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103). We will also use the term "contraposition" for this principle, although the reader is advised that in the field of philosophical logic, "contraposition" has a different technical meaning. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ( -.  ph  ->  -.  ps )  ->  ( ps  ->  ph ) )
 
Axiomax-mp 8 Rule of Modus Ponens. The postulated inference rule of propositional calculus. See e.g. Rule 1 of [Hamilton] p. 73. The rule says, "if  ph is true, and  ph implies  ps, then  ps must also be true." This rule is sometimes called "detachment," since it detaches the minor premise from the major premise. "Modus ponens" is short for "modus ponendo ponens," a Latin phrase that means "the mood that by affirming affirms" [Sanford] p. 39. This rule is similar to the rule of modus tollens mto 167.

Note: In some web page displays such as the Statement List, the symbols "&" and "=>" informally indicate the relationship between the hypotheses and the assertion (conclusion), abbreviating the English words "and" and "implies." They are not part of the formal language. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)

 |-  ph   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   =>    |-  ps
 
1.2.3  Logical implication

The results in this section are based on implication only, and avoid ax-3. In an implication, the wff before the arrow is called the "antecedent" and the wff after the arrow is called the "consequent."

We will use the following descriptive terms very loosely: A "closed form" or "tautology" has no $e hypotheses. An "inference" has one or more $e hypotheses. A "deduction" is an inference in which the hypotheses and the conclusion share the same antecedent.

 
Theoremmp2b 9 A double modus ponens inference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2013.)
 |-  ph   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ch )   =>    |- 
 ch
 
Theorema1i 10 Inference derived from axiom ax-1 5. See a1d 22 for an explanation of our informal use of the terms "inference" and "deduction." See also the comment in syld 40. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ph   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ph )
 
Theoremmp1i 11 Drop and replace an antecedent. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
 |-  ph   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  ps )
 
Theorema2i 12 Inference derived from axiom ax-2 6. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) )
 
Theoremimim2i 13 Inference adding common antecedents in an implication. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   =>    |-  (
 ( ch  ->  ph )  ->  ( ch  ->  ps )
 )
 
Theoremmpd 14 A modus ponens deduction. A translation of natural deduction rule  -> E ( -> elimination), see natded 20790. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ch )
 
Theoremsyl 15 An inference version of the transitive laws for implication imim2 49 and imim1 70, which Russell and Whitehead call "the principle of the syllogism...because...the syllogism in Barbara is derived from them" (quote after Theorem *2.06 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101). Some authors call this law a "hypothetical syllogism."

(A bit of trivia: this is the most commonly referenced assertion in our database. In second place is eqid 2283, followed by syl2anc 642, adantr 451, syl3anc 1182, and ax-mp 8. The Metamath program command 'show usage' shows the number of references.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 20-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Jul-2012.)

 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ch )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ch )
 
Theoremmpi 16 A nested modus ponens inference. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Stefan Allan, 20-Mar-2006.)
 |- 
 ps   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ch )
 
Theoremmp2 17 A double modus ponens inference. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Jul-2013.)
 |-  ph   &    |- 
 ps   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ch
 
Theorem3syl 18 Inference chaining two syllogisms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ch )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  th )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  th )
 
Theoremid 19 Principle of identity. Theorem *2.08 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101. For another version of the proof directly from axioms, see id1 20. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Stefan Allan, 20-Mar-2006.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ph )
 
Theoremid1 20 Principle of identity. Theorem *2.08 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101. This version is proved directly from the axioms for demonstration purposes. This proof is a popular example in the literature and is identical, step for step, to the proofs of Theorem 1 of [Margaris] p. 51, Example 2.7(a) of [Hamilton] p. 31, Lemma 10.3 of [BellMachover] p. 36, and Lemma 1.8 of [Mendelson] p. 36. It is also "Our first proof" in Hirst and Hirst's A Primer for Logic and Proof p. 17 (PDF p. 23) at http://www.mathsci.appstate.edu/~hirstjl/primer/hirst.pdf. For a shorter version of the proof that takes advantage of previously proved theorems, see id 19. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ph )
 
Theoremidd 21 Principle of identity with antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1995.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ps ) )
 
Theorema1d 22 Deduction introducing an embedded antecedent.

Naming convention: We often call a theorem a "deduction" and suffix its label with "d" whenever the hypotheses and conclusion are each prefixed with the same antecedent. This allows us to use the theorem in places where (in traditional textbook formalizations) the standard Deduction Theorem would be used; here  ph would be replaced with a conjunction (df-an 360) of the hypotheses of the would-be deduction. By contrast, we tend to call the simpler version with no common antecedent an "inference" and suffix its label with "i"; compare theorem a1i 10. Finally, a "theorem" would be the form with no hypotheses; in this case the "theorem" form would be the original axiom ax-1 5. We usually show the theorem form without a suffix on its label (e.g. pm2.43 47 vs. pm2.43i 43 vs. pm2.43d 44). When an inference is converted to a theorem by eliminating an "is a set" hypothesis, we sometimes suffix the theorem form with "g" (for "more general") as in uniex 4516 vs. uniexg 4517. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Stefan Allan, 20-Mar-2006.)

 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ps ) )
 
Theorema2d 23 Deduction distributing an embedded antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-1994.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( ps  ->  ch )  ->  ( ps  ->  th )
 ) )
 
Theorema1ii 24 Add two antecedents to a wff. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 4-Aug-2009.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Jul-2013.)
 |- 
 ch   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )
 
Theoremsylcom 25 Syllogism inference with commutation of antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2004.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 2-Feb-2006.) (Proof shortened by Stefan Allan, 23-Feb-2006.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremsyl5com 26 Syllogism inference with commuted antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2005.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremcom12 27 Inference that swaps (commutes) antecedents in an implication. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Aug-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  (
 ph  ->  ch ) )
 
Theoremsyl5 28 A syllogism rule of inference. The first premise is used to replace the second antecedent of the second premise. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-May-2013.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremsyl6 29 A syllogism rule of inference. The second premise is used to replace the consequent of the first premise. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jul-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  th )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremsyl56 30 Combine syl5 28 and syl6 29. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2013.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )   &    |-  ( th  ->  ta )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  ta ) )
 
Theoremsyl6com 31 Syllogism inference with commuted antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2005.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  th )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ph  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremmpcom 32 Modus ponens inference with commutation of antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1996.)
 |-  ( ps  ->  ph )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ch )
 
Theoremsyli 33 Syllogism inference with common nested antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2004.)
 |-  ( ps  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ph  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremsyl2im 34 Replace two antecedents. Implication-only version of syl2an 463. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 14-May-2013.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  th )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )
 
Theorempm2.27 35 This theorem, called "Assertion," can be thought of as closed form of modus ponens ax-mp 8. Theorem *2.27 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  (
 ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ps ) )
 
Theoremmpdd 36 A nested modus ponens deduction. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremmpid 37 A nested modus ponens deduction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ch )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremmpdi 38 A nested modus ponens deduction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 15-Jan-2008.)
 |-  ( ps  ->  ch )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremmpii 39 A doubly nested modus ponens inference. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Jul-2012.)
 |- 
 ch   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th )
 )
 
Theoremsyld 40 Syllogism deduction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 19-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Aug-2012.)

Notice that syld 40 has the same form as syl 15 with  ph added in front of each hypothesis and conclusion. When all theorems referenced in a proof are converted in this way, we can replace  ph with a hypothesis of the proof, allowing the hypothesis to be eliminated with id 19 and become an antecedent. The Deduction Theorem for propositional calculus, e.g. Theorem 3 in [Margaris] p. 56, tells us that this procedure is always possible.

 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremmp2d 41 A double modus ponens deduction. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Jul-2013.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ch )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  th )
 
Theorema1dd 42 Deduction introducing a nested embedded antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 15-Jan-2008.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) )
 
Theorempm2.43i 43 Inference absorbing redundant antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 28-Nov-2008.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ph  ->  ps ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ps )
 
Theorempm2.43d 44 Deduction absorbing redundant antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 28-Nov-2008.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch )
 )
 
Theorempm2.43a 45 Inference absorbing redundant antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-1995.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 28-Nov-2008.)
 |-  ( ps  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  (
 ph  ->  ch ) )
 
Theorempm2.43b 46 Inference absorbing redundant antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1995.)
 |-  ( ps  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch )
 )
 
Theorempm2.43 47 Absorption of redundant antecedent. Also called the "Contraction" or "Hilbert" axiom. Theorem *2.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 15-Aug-2004.)
 |-  ( ( ph  ->  (
 ph  ->  ps ) )  ->  ( ph  ->  ps )
 )
 
Theoremimim2d 48 Deduction adding nested antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( th  ->  ps )  ->  ( th  ->  ch )
 ) )
 
Theoremimim2 49 A closed form of syllogism (see syl 15). Theorem *2.05 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Sep-2012.)
 |-  ( ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  ->  ph )  ->  ( ch  ->  ps ) ) )
 
Theoremembantd 50 Deduction embedding an antecedent. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 4-Oct-2013.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  (
 ( ps  ->  ch )  ->  th ) )
 
Theorem3syld 51 Triple syllogism deduction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 4-Aug-2009.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ta ) )
 
Theoremsylsyld 52 Virtual deduction rule e12 28499 without virtual deduction symbols. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 20-Apr-2011.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )
 
Theoremimim12i 53 Inference joining two implications. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 29-Oct-2011.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  th )   =>    |-  ( ( ps  ->  ch )  ->  ( ph  ->  th ) )
 
Theoremimim1i 54 Inference adding common consequents in an implication, thereby interchanging the original antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Aug-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   =>    |-  (
 ( ps  ->  ch )  ->  ( ph  ->  ch )
 )
 
Theoremimim3i 55 Inference adding three nested antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2006.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ( th  -> 
 ph )  ->  (
 ( th  ->  ps )  ->  ( th  ->  ch )
 ) )
 
Theoremsylc 56 A syllogism inference combined with contraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.) (Revised by NM, 13-Jul-2013.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ch )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th )
 )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  th )
 
Theoremsyl3c 57 A syllogism inference combined with contraction. e111 28446 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 7-Jul-2011.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ch )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  th )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ta ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ta )
 
Theoremsyl6mpi 58 e20 28502 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Sep-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  th   &    |-  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ta ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ta ) )
 
Theoremmpsyl 59 Modus ponens combined with a syllogism inference. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 20-Apr-2011.)
 |-  ph   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ch )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  th )
 
Theoremsyl6c 60 Inference combining syl6 29 with contraction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 2-May-2011.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ta ) )
 
Theoremsyldd 61 Nested syllogism deduction. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-May-2013.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) ) )
 
Theoremsyl5d 62 A nested syllogism deduction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Josh Purinton, 29-Dec-2000.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 2-Feb-2006.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ( ch  ->  ta )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ( ps  ->  ta ) ) )
 
Theoremsyl7 63 A syllogism rule of inference. The first premise is used to replace the third antecedent of the second premise. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Aug-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ps  ->  ta )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ph  ->  ta ) ) )
 
Theoremsyl6d 64 A nested syllogism deduction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Josh Purinton, 29-Dec-2000.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 2-Feb-2006.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ta ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) ) )
 
Theoremsyl8 65 A syllogism rule of inference. The second premise is used to replace the consequent of the first premise. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Aug-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   &    |-  ( th  ->  ta )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) ) )
 
Theoremsyl9 66 A nested syllogism inference with different antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Josh Purinton, 29-Dec-2000.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( th  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ( ps  ->  ta ) ) )
 
Theoremsyl9r 67 A nested syllogism inference with different antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( th  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )   =>    |-  ( th  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ta ) ) )
 
Theoremimim12d 68 Deduction combining antecedents and consequents. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 30-Oct-2011.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ta ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  (
 ( ch  ->  th )  ->  ( ps  ->  ta )
 ) )
 
Theoremimim1d 69 Deduction adding nested consequents. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Sep-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ( ch  ->  th )  ->  ( ps  ->  th )
 ) )
 
Theoremimim1 70 A closed form of syllogism (see syl 15). Theorem *2.06 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-May-2013.)
 |-  ( ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ( ( ps  ->  ch )  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) ) )
 
Theorempm2.83 71 Theorem *2.83 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
 |-  ( ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch )
 )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) ) )
 
Theoremcom23 72 Commutation of antecedents. Swap 2nd and 3rd. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Aug-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) )
 
Theoremcom3r 73 Commutation of antecedents. Rotate right. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  (
 ph  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) )
 
Theoremcom13 74 Commutation of antecedents. Swap 1st and 3rd. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jul-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ph  ->  th ) ) )
 
Theoremcom3l 75 Commutation of antecedents. Rotate left. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jul-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  th ) ) )
 
Theorempm2.04 76 Swap antecedents. Theorem *2.04 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Sep-2012.)
 |-  ( ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch )
 )  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ph  ->  ch )
 ) )
 
Theoremcom34 77 Commutation of antecedents. Swap 3rd and 4th. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ( ch  ->  ta )
 ) ) )
 
Theoremcom4l 78 Commutation of antecedents. Rotate left. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 15-Aug-2004.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ph  ->  ta )
 ) ) )
 
Theoremcom4t 79 Commutation of antecedents. Rotate twice. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ta )
 ) ) )
 
Theoremcom4r 80 Commutation of antecedents. Rotate right. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 ) ) )   =>    |-  ( th  ->  (
 ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ta )
 ) ) )
 
Theoremcom24 81 Commutation of antecedents. Swap 2nd and 4th. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jul-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ps  ->  ta )
 ) ) )
 
Theoremcom14 82 Commutation of antecedents. Swap 1st and 4th. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Jul-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ta )
 ) ) )   =>    |-  ( th  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  ta )
 ) ) )
 
Theoremcom45 83 Commutation of antecedents. Swap 4th and 5th. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jun-2009.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremcom35 84 Commutation of antecedents. Swap 3rd and 5th. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jun-2009.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ta  ->  ( th  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremcom25 85 Commutation of antecedents. Swap 2nd and 5th. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jun-2009.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ps  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremcom5l 86 Commutation of antecedents. Rotate left. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Jul-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ph  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremcom15 87 Commutation of antecedents. Swap 1st and 5th. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Jul-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ta  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ph  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremcom52l 88 Commutation of antecedents. Rotate left twice. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jun-2009.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  (
 ph  ->  ( ps  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremcom52r 89 Commutation of antecedents. Rotate right twice. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jun-2009.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremcom5r 90 Commutation of antecedents. Rotate right. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 29-Jul-2012.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ta  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremjarr 91 Elimination of a nested antecedent as a kind of reversal of inference ja 153. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-May-2013.)
 |-  ( ( ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ch )  ->  ( ps  ->  ch )
 )
 
Theorempm2.86i 92 Inference based on pm2.86 94. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Apr-2013.)
 |-  ( ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch )
 )
 
Theorempm2.86d 93 Deduction based on pm2.86 94. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Apr-2013.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  (
 ( ps  ->  ch )  ->  ( ps  ->  th )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )
 
Theorempm2.86 94 Converse of axiom ax-2 6. Theorem *2.86 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Apr-2013.)
 |-  ( ( ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) )
 
TheoremloolinALT 95 The Linearity Axiom of the infinite-valued sentential logic (L-infinity) of Lukasiewicz. This version of loolin 173 does not use ax-3 7, meaning that this theorem is intuitionistically valid. (Contributed by O'Cat, 12-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ( ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ( ps  ->  ph ) )  ->  ( ps  ->  ph ) )
 
Theoremloowoz 96 An alternate for the Linearity Axiom of the infinite-valued sentential logic (L-infinity) of Lukasiewicz, due to Barbara Wozniakowska, Reports on Mathematical Logic 10, 129-137 (1978). (Contributed by O'Cat, 8-Aug-2004.)
 |-  ( ( ( ph  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) )  ->  ( ( ps  ->  ph )  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) )
 
1.2.4  Logical negation

This section makes our first use of the third axiom of propositional calculus, ax-3 7.

 
Theoremcon4d 97 Deduction derived from axiom ax-3 7. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1995.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( -.  ps  ->  -.  ch )
 )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ps ) )
 
Theorempm2.21d 98 A contradiction implies anything. Deduction from pm2.21 100. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )
 
Theorempm2.21dd 99 A contradiction implies anything. Deduction from pm2.21 100. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ps )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  -.  ps )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ch )
 
Theorempm2.21 100 From a wff and its negation, anything is true. Theorem *2.21 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. Also called the Duns Scotus law. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Sep-2012.)
 |-  ( -.  ph  ->  (
 ph  ->  ps ) )
    < Previous  Next >

Page List
Jump to page: Contents  1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10700 108 10701-10800 109 10801-10900 110 10901-11000 111 11001-11100 112 11101-11200 113 11201-11300 114 11301-11400 115 11401-11500 116 11501-11600 117 11601-11700 118 11701-11800 119 11801-11900 120 11901-12000 121 12001-12100 122 12101-12200 123 12201-12300 124 12301-12400 125 12401-12500 126 12501-12600 127 12601-12700 128 12701-12800 129 12801-12900 130 12901-13000 131 13001-13100 132 13101-13200 133 13201-13300 134 13301-13400 135 13401-13500 136 13501-13600 137 13601-13700 138 13701-13800 139 13801-13900 140 13901-14000 141 14001-14100 142 14101-14200 143 14201-14300 144 14301-14400 145 14401-14500 146 14501-14600 147 14601-14700 148 14701-14800 149 14801-14900 150 14901-15000 151 15001-15100 152 15101-15200 153 15201-15300 154 15301-15400 155 15401-15500 156 15501-15600 157 15601-15700 158 15701-15800 159 15801-15900 160 15901-16000 161 16001-16100 162 16101-16200 163 16201-16300 164 16301-16400 165 16401-16500 166 16501-16600 167 16601-16700 168 16701-16800 169 16801-16900 170 16901-17000 171 17001-17100 172 17101-17200 173 17201-17300 174 17301-17400 175 17401-17500 176 17501-17600 177 17601-17700 178 17701-17800 179 17801-17900 180 17901-18000 181 18001-18100 182 18101-18200 183 18201-18300 184 18301-18400 185 18401-18500 186 18501-18600 187 18601-18700 188 18701-18800 189 18801-18900 190 18901-19000 191 19001-19100 192 19101-19200 193 19201-19300 194 19301-19400 195 19401-19500 196 19501-19600 197 19601-19700 198 19701-19800 199 19801-19900 200 19901-20000 201 20001-20100 202 20101-20200 203 20201-20300 204 20301-20400 205 20401-20500 206 20501-20600 207 20601-20700 208 20701-20800 209 20801-20900 210 20901-21000 211 21001-21100 212 21101-21200 213 21201-21300 214 21301-21400 215 21401-21500 216 21501-21600 217 21601-21700 218 21701-21800 219 21801-21900 220 21901-22000 221 22001-22100 222 22101-22200 223 22201-22300 224 22301-22400 225 22401-22500 226 22501-22600 227 22601-22700 228 22701-22800 229 22801-22900 230 22901-23000 231 23001-23100 232 23101-23200 233 23201-23300 234 23301-23400 235 23401-23500 236 23501-23600 237 23601-23700 238 23701-23800 239 23801-23900 240 23901-24000 241 24001-24100 242 24101-24200 243 24201-24300 244 24301-24400 245 24401-24500 246 24501-24600 247 24601-24700 248 24701-24800 249 24801-24900 250 24901-25000 251 25001-25100 252 25101-25200 253 25201-25300 254 25301-25400 255 25401-25500 256 25501-25600 257 25601-25700 258 25701-25800 259 25801-25900 260 25901-26000 261 26001-26100 262 26101-26200 263 26201-26300 264 26301-26400 265 26401-26500 266 26501-26600 267 26601-26700 268 26701-26800 269 26801-26900 270 26901-27000 271 27001-27100 272 27101-27200 273 27201-27300 274 27301-27400 275 27401-27500 276 27501-27600 277 27601-27700 278 27701-27800 279 27801-27900 280 27901-28000 281 28001-28100 282 28101-28200 283 28201-28300 284 28301-28400 285 28401-28500 286 28501-28600 287 28601-28700 288 28701-28800 289 28801-28900 290 28901-29000 291 29001-29100 292 29101-29200 293 29201-29300 294 29301-29400 295 29401-29500 296 29501-29600 297 29601-29700 298 29701-29800 299 29801-29900 300 29901-30000 301 30001-30100 302 30101-30200 303 30201-30300 304 30301-30400 305 30401-30500 306 30501-30600 307 30601-30700 308 30701-30800 309 30801-30900 310 30901-31000 311 31001-31100 312 31101-31200 313 31201-31300 314 31301-31400 315 31401-31500 316 31501-31600 317 31601-31700 318 31701-31800 319 31801-31900 320 31901-32000 321 32001-32100 322 32101-32154
  Copyright terms: Public domain < Previous  Next >