HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer
Theorem List (p. 287 of 322)
< Previous  Next >
Browser slow? Try the
Unicode version.

Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  MPE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Color key:    Metamath Proof Explorer  Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-21498)
  Hilbert Space Explorer  Hilbert Space Explorer
(21499-23021)
  Users' Mathboxes  Users' Mathboxes
(23022-32154)
 

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28601-28700   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
TheorempwtrrOLD 28601 A set is transitive if its power set is. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from pwtrrVD 28600 using a tools command file, translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Moved into main set.mm as pwtr 4226 and may be deleted by mathbox owner, AS. --NM 15-Jun-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( Tr  ~P A  ->  Tr  A )
 
TheoremsnssiALTVD 28602 Virtual deduction proof of snssiALT 28603. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  { A }  C_  B )
 
TheoremsnssiALT 28603 If a class is an element of another class, then its singleton is a subclass of that other class. Alternate proof of snssi 3759. This theorem was automatically generated from snssiALTVD 28602 using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  { A }  C_  B )
 
TheoremsnsslVD 28604 Virtual deduction proof of snssl 28605. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( { A }  C_  B  ->  A  e.  B )
 
Theoremsnssl 28605 If a singleton is a subclass of another class, then the singleton's element is an element of that other class. This theorem is the right-to-left implication of the biconditional snss 3748. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from snsslVD 28604 using a tools command file, translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( { A }  C_  B  ->  A  e.  B )
 
TheoremsnelpwrVD 28606 Virtual deduction proof of snelpwi 4220. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  { A }  e.  ~P B )
 
TheoremsnelpwrOLD 28607 If a class is contained in another class, then its singleton is contained in the power class of that other class. This theorem is the left-to-right implication of the biconditional snelpw 4221. Unlike snelpw 4221, 
A may be a proper class. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from snelpwrVD 28606 using a tools command file, translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Moved to snelpwi 4220 in main set.mm and may be deleted by mathbox owner, AS. --NM 10-Sep-2013.) (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  { A }  e.  ~P B )
 
TheoremunipwrVD 28608 Virtual deduction proof of unipwr 28609. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  C_ 
 U. ~P A
 
Theoremunipwr 28609 A class is a subclass of the union of its power class. This theorem is the right-to-left subclass lemma of unipw 4224. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from unipwrVD 28608 using a tools command file , translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  C_ 
 U. ~P A
 
TheoremsstrALT2VD 28610 Virtual deduction proof of sstrALT2 28611. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  C_  B  /\  B  C_  C )  ->  A  C_  C )
 
TheoremsstrALT2 28611 Virtual deduction proof of sstr 3187, transitivity of subclasses, Theorem 6 of [Suppes] p. 23. This theorem was automatically generated from sstrALT2VD 28610 using the command file translatewithout_overwriting.cmd . It was not minimized because the automated minimization excluding duplicates generates a minimized proof which, although not directly containing any duplicates, indirectly contains a duplicate. That is, the trace back of the minimized proof contains a duplicate. This is undesirable because some step(s) of the minimized proof use the proven theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  C_  B  /\  B  C_  C )  ->  A  C_  C )
 
TheoremsuctrALT2VD 28612 Virtual deduction proof of suctrALT2 28613. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Tr  A  ->  Tr  suc  A )
 
TheoremsuctrALT2 28613 Virtual deduction proof of suctr 4475. The sucessor of a transitive class is transitive. This proof was generated automatically from the virtual deduction proof suctrALT2VD 28612 using the tools command file translatewithout_overwritingminimize_excludingduplicates.cmd . (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Tr  A  ->  Tr  suc  A )
 
Theoremelex2VD 28614* Virtual deduction proof of elex2 2800. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  E. x  x  e.  B )
 
Theoremelex22VD 28615* Virtual deduction proof of elex22 2799. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  e.  B  /\  A  e.  C ) 
 ->  E. x ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  C ) )
 
Theoremeqsbc3rVD 28616* Virtual deduction proof of eqsbc3r 3048. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ]. C  =  x  <->  C  =  A ) )
 
Theoremzfregs2VD 28617* Virtual deduction proof of zfregs2 7415. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  =/=  (/)  ->  -.  A. x  e.  A  E. y ( y  e.  A  /\  y  e.  x )
 )
 
Theoremtpid3gVD 28618 Virtual deduction proof of tpid3g 3741. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A }
 )
 
Theoremen3lplem1VD 28619* Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem1 7416. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  e.  B  /\  B  e.  C  /\  C  e.  A )  ->  ( x  =  A  ->  E. y ( y  e.  { A ,  B ,  C }  /\  y  e.  x ) ) )
 
Theoremen3lplem2VD 28620* Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem2 7417. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  e.  B  /\  B  e.  C  /\  C  e.  A )  ->  ( x  e.  { A ,  B ,  C }  ->  E. y
 ( y  e.  { A ,  B ,  C }  /\  y  e.  x ) ) )
 
Theoremen3lpVD 28621 Virtual deduction proof of en3lp 7418. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  -.  ( A  e.  B  /\  B  e.  C  /\  C  e.  A )
 
18.25.5  Theorems proved using virtual deduction with mmj2 assistance
 
Theoremsimplbi2VD 28622 Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2 608. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
h1::  |-  ( ph  <->  ( ps  /\  ch ) )
3:1,?: e0_ 28547  |-  ( ( ps  /\  ch )  ->  ph )
qed:3,?: e0_ 28547  |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( ps  /\  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) )
 
Theorem3ornot23VD 28623 Virtual deduction proof of 3ornot23 28270. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::
 |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps ) ).
3:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  -.  ph ).
4:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  -.  ps ).
5:3,4,?: e11 28460  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  -.  ( ph  \/  ps ) ).
6:2,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ( ph  \/  ps ) ) ).
7:5,6,?: e12 28499  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->.  ch ).
8:7:  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->  ch ) ).
qed:8:  |-  ( ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->  ch ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->  ch ) )
 
Theoremorbi1rVD 28624 Virtual deduction proof of orbi1r 28271. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ph ) ).
3:2,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph )  ->.  ( ph  \/  ch ) ).
4:1,3,?: e12 28499  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph )  ->.  ( ps  \/  ch ) ).
5:4,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ps ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  \/  ph )  ->  ( ch  \/  ps ) ) ).
7::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ps ) ).
8:7,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ps  \/  ch ) ).
9:1,8,?: e12 28499  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ph  \/  ch ) ).
10:9,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ph ) ).
11:10:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  \/  ps )  ->  ( ch  \/  ph ) ) ).
12:6,11,?: e11 28460  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  \/  ph )  <->  ( ch  \/  ps ) ) ).
qed:12:  |-  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  \/  ph )  <->  ( ch  \/  ps ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  (
 ( ch  \/  ph ) 
 <->  ( ch  \/  ps ) ) )
 
Theorembitr3VD 28625 Virtual deduction proof of bitr3 28272. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ps  <->  ph ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ph  <->  ch )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ch ) ).
4:3,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ph  <->  ch )  ->.  ( ch  <->  ph ) ).
5:2,4,?: e12 28499  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ph  <->  ch )  ->.  ( ps  <->  ch ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ph  <->  ch )  ->  ( ps  <->  ch ) ) ).
qed:6:  |-  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( ( ph  <->  ch )  ->  ( ps  <->  ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  (
 ( ph  <->  ch )  ->  ( ps 
 <->  ch ) ) )
 
Theorem3orbi123VD 28626 Virtual deduction proof of 3orbi123 28273. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
3:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
4:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ta  <->  et ) ).
5:2,3,?: e11 28460  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  \/  ch )  <->  ( ps  \/  th ) ) ).
6:5,4,?: e11 28460  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ( ph  \/  ch )  \/  ta )  <->  ( ( ps  \/  th )  \/  et ) ) ).
7:?:  |-  ( ( ( ph  \/  ch )  \/  ta )  <->  ( ph  \/  ch  \/  ta ) )
8:6,7,?: e10 28467  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  \/  ch  \/  ta )  <->  ( ( ps  \/  th )  \/  et ) ) ).
9:?:  |-  ( ( ( ps  \/  th )  \/  et )  <->  ( ps  \/  th  \/  et ) )
10:8,9,?: e10 28467  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  \/  ch  \/  ta )  <->  ( ps  \/  th  \/  et ) ) ).
qed:10:  |-  ( ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->  ( ( ph  \/  ch  \/  ta )  <->  ( ps  \/  th  \/  et ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch 
 <-> 
 th )  /\  ( ta 
 <->  et ) )  ->  ( ( ph  \/  ch 
 \/  ta )  <->  ( ps  \/  th 
 \/  et ) ) )
 
Theoremsbc3orgVD 28627 Virtual deduction proof of sbc3org 28295. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
3::  |-  ( ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch ) )
32:3:  |-  A. x ( ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch ) )
33:1,32,?: e10 28467  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch ) ) ).
4:1,33,?: e11 28460  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch ) ) ).
5:2,4,?: e11 28460  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
6:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps ) ) ).
7:6,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch )  <->  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
8:5,7,?: e11 28460  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
9:?:  |-  ( ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )
10:8,9,?: e10 28467  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
qed:10:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps  \/  [. A  /  x ].
 ch ) ) )
 
Theorem19.21a3con13vVD 28628* Virtual deduction proof of alrim3con13v 28296. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph )  ->.  ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch ) ).
3:2,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ps ).
4:2,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ph ).
5:2,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ch ).
6:1,4,?: e12 28499  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  A. x ph ).
7:3,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  A. x ps ).
8:5,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  A. x ch ).
9:7,6,8,?: e222 28408  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ( A. x ps  /\  A. x ph  /\  A. x ch ) ).
10:9,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  A. x ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch ) ).
11:10:in2  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph )  ->.  ( ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->  A. x ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch ) ) ).
qed:11:in1  |-  ( ( ph  ->  A. x ph )  ->  ( ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->  A. x ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  ->  A. x ph )  ->  ( ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->  A. x ( ps 
 /\  ph  /\  ch )
 ) )
 
TheoremexbirVD 28629 Virtual deduction proof of exbir 1355. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,.  ( ph  /\  ps )  ->.  ( ph  /\  ps ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,.  ( ph  /\  ps ) ,  th  ->.  th ).
5:1,2,?: e12 28499  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,  ( ph  /\  ps )  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
6:3,5,?: e32 28533  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,  ( ph  /\  ps ) ,  th  ->.  ch ).
7:6:  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,  ( ph  /\  ps )  ->.  ( th  ->  ch ) ).
8:7:  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ).
9:8,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ) ).
qed:9:  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch )
 ) ) )
 
TheoremexbiriVD 28630 Virtual deduction proof of exbiri 605. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
h1::  |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )
2::  |-  (. ph  ->.  ph ).
3::  |-  (. ph ,. ps  ->.  ps ).
4::  |-  (. ph ,. ps ,. th  ->.  th ).
5:2,1,?: e10 28467  |-  (. ph  ->.  ( ps  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ).
6:3,5,?: e21 28505  |-  (. ph ,. ps  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
7:4,6,?: e32 28533  |-  (. ph ,. ps ,. th  ->.  ch ).
8:7:  |-  (. ph ,. ps  ->.  ( th  ->  ch ) ).
9:8:  |-  (. ph  ->.  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ).
qed:9:  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) )
 
Theoremrspsbc2VD 28631* Virtual deduction proof of rspsbc2 28297. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D  ->.  C  e.  D ).
3::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph ).
4:1,3,?: e13 28523  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. A. y  e.  D ph ).
5:1,4,?: e13 28523  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. y  e.  D [. A  /  x ]. ph ).
6:2,5,?: e23 28530  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ]. ph ).
7:6:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D  ->.  ( A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->  [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ]. ph ) ).
8:7:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( C  e.  D  ->  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ]. ph ) ) ).
qed:8:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( C  e.  D  ->  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ]. ph ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( C  e.  D  ->  (
 A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D  ph  -> 
 [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ].
 ph ) ) )
 
Theorem3impexpVD 28632 Virtual deduction proof of 3impexp 1356. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th ) ).
2::  |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  <->  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  /\  ch ) )
3:1,2,?: e10 28467  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->.  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps )  /\  ch )  ->  th ) ).
4:3,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ).
5:4,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ) ).
6:5:  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ) )
7::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ) ).
8:7,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ).
9:8,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps )  /\  ch )  ->  th ) ).
10:2,9,?: e01 28463  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th ) ).
11:10:  |-  ( ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th ) )
qed:6,11,?: e00 28543  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  <->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\ 
 ch )  ->  th )  <->  (
 ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th )
 ) ) )
 
Theorem3impexpbicomVD 28633 Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicom 1357. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) ) ).
2::  |-  ( ( th  <->  ta )  <->  ( ta  <->  th ) )
3:1,2,?: e10 28467  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ).
4:3,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) ).
5:4:  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) )
6::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) ).
7:6,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ).
8:7,2,?: e10 28467  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) ) ).
9:8:  |-  ( ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )  ->  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) ) )
qed:5,9,?: e00 28543  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  <->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\ 
 ch )  ->  ( th 
 <->  ta ) )  <->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) )
 
Theorem3impexpbicomiVD 28634 Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 1358. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
h1::  |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )
qed:1,?: e0_ 28547  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )
 
TheoremsbcoreleleqVD 28635* Virtual deduction proof of sbcoreleleq 28298. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. x  e.  y  <->  x  e.  A ) ).
3:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. y  e.  x  <->  A  e.  x ) ).
4:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. x  =  y  <->  x  =  A ) ).
5:2,3,4,?: e111 28446  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  A  e.  x  \/  x  =  A )  <->  ( [. A  /  y ]. x  e.  y  \/  [. A  /  y ]. y  e.  x  \/  [. A  /  y ]. x  =  y ) ) ).
6:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  <->  ( [. A  /  y ]. x  e.  y  \/  [. A  /  y ]. y  e.  x  \/  [. A  /  y ]. x  =  y ) ) ).
7:5,6: e11 28460  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  A  e.  x  \/  x  =  A ) ) ).
qed:7:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  A  e.  x  \/  x  =  A ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y
 ) 
 <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  A  e.  x  \/  x  =  A )
 ) )
 
Theoremhbra2VD 28636* Virtual deduction proof of nfra2 2597. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  ( A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph  ->  A. y A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
2::  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  <->  A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
3:1,2,?: e00 28543  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  ->  A. y A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
4:2:  |-  A. y ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  <->  A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
5:4,?: e0_ 28547  |-  ( A. y A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  <->  A. y A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
qed:3,5,?: e00 28543  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  ->  A. y A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  B  ph  ->  A. y A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  B  ph )
 
TheoremtratrbVD 28637* Virtual deduction proof of tratrb 28299. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  A ).
3:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
4:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  B  e.  A ).
5::  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ).
6:5,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  x  e.  y ).
7:5,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  y  e.  B ).
8:2,7,4,?: e121 28428  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  y  e.  A ).
9:2,6,8,?: e122 28425  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  x  e.  A ).
10::  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  B  e.  x  ->.  B  e.  x ).
11:6,7,10,?: e223 28407  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  B  e.  x  ->.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B  /\  B  e.  x ) ).
12:11:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  ( B  e.  x  ->  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B  /\  B  e.  x ) ) ).
13::  |-  -.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B  /\  B  e.  x )
14:12,13,?: e20 28502  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  -.  B  e.  x ).
15::  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  x  =  B  ->.  x  =  B ).
16:7,15,?: e23 28530  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  x  =  B  ->.  y  e.  x ).
17:6,16,?: e23 28530  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  x  =  B  ->.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x ) ).
18:17:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  ( x  =  B  ->  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x ) ) ).
19::  |-  -.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )
20:18,19,?: e20 28502  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  -.  x  =  B ).
21:3,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. y  e.  A  A. x  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
22:21,9,4,?: e121 28428  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  [. x  /  x ]. [. B  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
23:22,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  [. B  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
24:4,23,?: e12 28499  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  ( x  e.  B  \/  B  e.  x  \/  x  =  B ) ).
25:14,20,24,?: e222 28408  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  x  e.  B ).
26:25:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  ( ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->  x  e.  B ) ).
27::  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  ->  A. y A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
28:27,?: e0_ 28547  |-  ( ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  A. y ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) )
29:28,26:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. y ( ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->  x  e.  B ) ).
30::  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  ->  A. x A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
31:30,?: e0_ 28547  |-  ( ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  A. x ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) )
32:31,29:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  A. y ( ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->  x  e.  B ) ).
33:32,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  B ).
qed:33:  |-  ( ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  Tr  B )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) 
 ->  Tr  B )
 
Theorem3ax5VD 28638 Virtual deduction proof of 3ax5 28300. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( A. x ph  ->  A. x ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
3::  |-  ( A. x ( ps  ->  ch )  ->  ( A. x ps  ->  A. x ch ) )
4:2,3,?: e10 28467  |-  (. A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( A. x ph  ->  ( A. x ps  ->  A. x ch ) ) ).
qed:4:  |-  ( A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->  ( A. x ph  ->  ( A. x ps  ->  A. x ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch )
 )  ->  ( A. x ph  ->  ( A. x ps  ->  A. x ch ) ) )
 
Theoremsyl5impVD 28639 Virtual deduction proof of syl5imp 28274. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28399  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( ps  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ,. ( th  ->  ps )  ->.  ( th  ->  ps ) ).
4:3,2,?: e21 28505  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ,. ( th  ->  ps )  ->.  ( th  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) ) ).
5:4,?: e2 28403  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ,. ( th  ->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( ( th  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ) ).
qed:6:  |-  ( ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->  ( ( th  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  ->  ( ps 
 ->  ch ) )  ->  ( ( th  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ch )
 ) ) )
 
TheoremidiVD 28640 Virtual deduction proof of idi 2. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
h1::  |-  ph
qed:1,?: e0_ 28547  |-  ph
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ph   =>    |-  ph
 
TheoremancomsimpVD 28641 Closed form of ancoms 439. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  <->  ( ps  /\  ph ) )
qed:1,?: e0_ 28547  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ch )  <->  ( ( ps  /\  ph )  ->  ch ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ch )  <->  ( ( ps 
 /\  ph )  ->  ch )
 )
 
Theoremssralv2VD 28642* Quantification restricted to a subclass for two quantifiers. ssralv 3237 for two quantifiers. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ssralv2 28294 is ssralv2VD 28642 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ssralv2VD 28642.
1::  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->.  ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph ).
3:1:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->.  A  C_  B ).
4:3,2:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  D ph ).
5:4:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x ( x  e.  A  ->  A. y  e.  D ph ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  ( x  e.  A  ->  A. y  e.  D ph ) ).
7::  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph ,  x  e.  A  ->.  x  e.  A ).
8:7,6:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph ,  x  e.  A  ->.  A. y  e.  D ph ).
9:1:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->.  C  C_  D ).
10:9,8:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph ,  x  e.  A  ->.  A. y  e.  C ph ).
11:10:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  ( x  e.  A  ->  A. y  e.  C ph ) ).
12::  |-  ( ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->  A. x ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) )
13::  |-  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  A. x A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph )
14:12,13,11:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x ( x  e.  A  ->  A. y  e.  C ph ) ).
15:14:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  C ph ).
16:15:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->.  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  C ph ) ).
qed:16:  |-  ( ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  C ph ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->  ( A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D  ph  ->  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  C  ph ) )
 
TheoremordelordALTVD 28643 An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 4414 using the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 7321. dford2 is a weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it need not be assumed that  _E  Fr  A because this is inferred by the Axiom of Regularity. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ordelordALT 28301 is ordelordALTVD 28643 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ordelordALTVD 28643 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command.
1::  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A ) ).
2:1:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Ord  A ).
3:1:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  B  e.  A ).
4:2:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  A ).
5:2:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) ).
6:4,3:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  B  C_  A ).
7:6,6,5:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  B ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) ).
8::  |-  ( ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
9:8:  |-  A. y ( ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
10:9:  |-  A. y  e.  A ( ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
11:10:  |-  ( A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
12:11:  |-  A. x ( A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
13:12:  |-  A. x  e.  A ( A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
14:13:  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
15:14,5:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
16:4,15,3:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  B ).
17:16,7:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Ord  B ).
qed:17:  |-  ( ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  Ord  B )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  Ord  B )
 
TheoremequncomVD 28644 If a class equals the union of two other classes, then it equals the union of those two classes commuted. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncom 3320 is equncomVD 28644 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomVD 28644.
1::  |-  (. A  =  ( B  u.  C )  ->.  A  =  ( B  u.  C ) ).
2::  |-  ( B  u.  C )  =  ( C  u.  B )
3:1,2:  |-  (. A  =  ( B  u.  C )  ->.  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) ).
4:3:  |-  ( A  =  ( B  u.  C )  ->  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) )
5::  |-  (. A  =  ( C  u.  B )  ->.  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) ).
6:5,2:  |-  (. A  =  ( C  u.  B )  ->.  A  =  ( B  u.  C ) ).
7:6:  |-  ( A  =  ( C  u.  B )  ->  A  =  ( B  u.  C ) )
8:4,7:  |-  ( A  =  ( B  u.  C )  <->  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  =  ( B  u.  C )  <->  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) )
 
TheoremequncomiVD 28645 Inference form of equncom 3320. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 3321 is equncomiVD 28645 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 28645.
h1::  |-  A  =  ( B  u.  C )
qed:1:  |-  A  =  ( C  u.  B )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  =  ( B  u.  C )   =>    |-  A  =  ( C  u.  B )
 
TheoremsucidALTVD 28646 A set belongs to its successor. Alternate proof of sucid 4471. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucidALT 28647 is sucidALTVD 28646 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sucidALTVD 28646. This proof illustrates that completeusersproof.cmd will generate a Metamath proof from any User's Proof which is "conventional" in the sense that no step is a virtual deduction, provided that all necessary unification theorems and transformation deductions are in set.mm. completeusersproof.cmd automatically converts such a conventional proof into a Virtual Deduction proof for which each step happens to be a 0-virtual hypothesis virtual deduction. The user does not need to search for reference theorem labels or deduction labels nor does he(she) need to use theorems and deductions which unify with reference theorems and deductions in set.mm. All that is necessary is that each theorem or deduction of the User's Proof unifies with some reference theorem or deduction in set.mm or is a semantic variation of some theorem or deduction which unifies with some reference theorem or deduction in set.mm. The definition of "semantic variation" has not been precisely defined. If it is obvious that a theorem or deduction has the same meaning as another theorem or deduction, then it is a semantic variation of the latter theorem or deduction. For example, step 4 of the User's Proof is a semantic variation of the definition (axiom)  suc  A  =  ( A  u.  { A } ), which unifies with df-suc 4398, a reference definition (axiom) in set.mm. Also, a theorem or deduction is said to be a semantic variation of a another theorem or deduction if it is obvious upon cursory inspection that it has the same meaning as a weaker form of the latter theorem or deduction. For example, the deduction  Ord  A infers  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) is a semantic variation of the theorem  ( Ord  A  <->  ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) ) ), which unifies with the set.mm reference definition (axiom) dford2 7321.
h1::  |-  A  e.  _V
2:1:  |-  A  e.  { A }
3:2:  |-  A  e.  ( { A }  u.  A )
4::  |-  suc  A  =  ( { A }  u.  A )
qed:3,4:  |-  A  e.  suc  A
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  A  e.  suc  A
 
TheoremsucidALT 28647 A set belongs to its successor. This proof was automatically derived from sucidALTVD 28646 using translatewithout_overwriting.cmd and minimizing. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  A  e.  suc  A
 
TheoremsucidVD 28648 A set belongs to its successor. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucid 4471 is sucidVD 28648 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sucidVD 28648.
h1::  |-  A  e.  _V
2:1:  |-  A  e.  { A }
3:2:  |-  A  e.  ( A  u.  { A } )
4::  |-  suc  A  =  ( A  u.  { A } )
qed:3,4:  |-  A  e.  suc  A
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  A  e.  suc  A
 
Theoremimbi12VD 28649 Implication form of imbi12i 316. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi12 28282 is imbi12VD 28649 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from imbi12VD 28649.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ph  ->  ch )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ch ) ).
4:1,3:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ph  ->  ch )  ->.  ( ps  ->  ch ) ).
5:2,4:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ph  ->  ch )  ->.  ( ps  ->  th ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ( ph  ->  ch )  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) ).
7::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ps  ->  th )  ->.  ( ps  ->  th ) ).
8:1,7:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ps  ->  th )  ->.  ( ph  ->  th ) ).
9:2,8:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ps  ->  th )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ch ) ).
10:9:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ( ps  ->  th )  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) ) ).
11:6,10:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ( ph  ->  ch )  <->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) ).
12:11:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  <->  th )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ch )  <->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) ) ).
qed:12:  |-  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  <->  th )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ch )  <->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  (
 ( ch  <->  th )  ->  (
 ( ph  ->  ch )  <->  ( ps  ->  th )
 ) ) )
 
Theoremimbi13VD 28650 Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi13 28283 is imbi13VD 28650 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from imbi13VD 28650.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ta  <->  et )  ->.  ( ta  <->  et ) ).
4:2,3:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ta  <->  et )  ->.  ( ( ch  ->  ta )  <->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ).
5:1,4:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ta  <->  et )  ->.  ( ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ( ta  <->  et )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ) ).
7:6:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  <->  th )  ->  ( ( ta  <->  et )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ) ) ).
qed:7:  |-  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  <->  th )  ->  ( ( ta  <->  et )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  (
 ( ch  <->  th )  ->  (
 ( ta  <->  et )  ->  (
 ( ph  ->  ( ch 
 ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et )
 ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremsbcim2gVD 28651 Distribution of class substitution over a left-nested implication. Similar to sbcimg 3032. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcim2g 28302 is sbcim2gVD 28651 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcim2gVD 28651.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
3:1,2:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
4:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ps  ->  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
5:3,4:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ) ).
7::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
8:4,7:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
9:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ) ).
10:8,9:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
11:10:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ) ).
12:6,11:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ) ).
qed:12:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ].
 ps  ->  [. A  /  x ].
 ch ) ) ) )
 
TheoremsbcbiVD 28652 Implication form of sbcbiiOLD 3047. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcbi 28303 is sbcbiVD 28652 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcbiVD 28652.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  A. x ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
3:1,2:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
4:1,3:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ps ) ).
5:4:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ps ) ) ).
qed:5:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ps ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. A  /  x ].
 ps ) ) )
 
TheoremtrsbcVD 28653* Formula-building inference rule for class substitution, substituting a class variable for the set variable of the transitivity predicate. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. trsbc 28304 is trsbcVD 28653 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trsbcVD 28653.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  y  <->  z  e.  y ) ).
3:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  x  <->  y  e.  A ) ).
4:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  x  <->  z  e.  A ) ).
5:1,2,3,4:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  y  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  x  ->  [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  A  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ) ).
6:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  y  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  x  ->  [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  x ) ) ) ).
7:5,6:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  A  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ) ).
8::  |-  ( ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  A  ->  z  e.  A ) )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) )
9:7,8:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
10::  |-  ( ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) )
11:10:  |-  A. x ( ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) )
12:1,11:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) ) ).
13:9,12:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
14:13:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A. y ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
15:14:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( A. y [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
16:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. y [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) ) ).
17:15,16:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
18:17:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A. z ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
19:18:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( A. z [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
20:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. z A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. z [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) ) ).
21:19,20:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. z A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
22::  |-  ( Tr  A  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) )
23:21,22:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. z A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  Tr  A ) ).
24::  |-  ( Tr  x  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) )
25:24:  |-  A. x ( Tr  x  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) )
26:1,25:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. Tr  x  <->  [. A  /  x ]. A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) ) ).
27:23,26:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. Tr  x  <->  Tr  A ) ).
qed:27:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. Tr  x  <->  Tr  A ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ].
 Tr  x  <->  Tr  A ) )
 
TheoremtruniALTVD 28654* The union of a class of transitive sets is transitive. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. truniALT 28305 is truniALTVD 28654 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from truniALTVD 28654.
1::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  A. x  e.  A  Tr  x ).
2::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ).
3:2:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  z  e.  y ).
4:2:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  y  e.  U. A ).
5:4:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  E. q ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A ) ).
6::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A ) ).
7:6:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  y  e.  q ).
8:6:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  q  e.  A ).
9:1,8:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  [ q  /  x ] Tr  x ).
10:8,9:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  q ).
11:3,7,10:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  z  e.  q ).
12:11,8:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  z  e.  U. A ).
13:12:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  ( ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
14:13:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  A. q ( ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
15:14:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  ( E. q ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
16:5,15:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  z  e.  U. A ).
17:16:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
18:17:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
19:18:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  Tr  U. A ).
qed:19:  |-  ( A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->  Tr  U. A )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x  e.  A  Tr  x  ->  Tr  U. A )
 
Theoremee33VD 28655 Non-virtual deduction form of e33 28509. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ee33 28284 is ee33VD 28655 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ee33VD 28655.
h1::  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )
h2::  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) ) )
h3::  |-  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) )
4:1,3:  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) )
5:4:  |-  ( ta  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) )
6:2,5:  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) ) ) )
7:6:  |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
8:7:  |-  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) )
qed:8:  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th )
 ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) ) )   &    |-  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) )
 
TheoremtrintALTVD 28656* The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Virtual deduction proof of trintALT 28657. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. trintALT 28657 is trintALTVD 28656 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trintALTVD 28656.
1::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  A. x  e.  A Tr  x ).
2::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ).
3:2:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  z  e.  y ).
4:2:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  y  e.  |^| A ).
5:4:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  A. q  e.  A y  e.  q ).
6:5:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  ( q  e.  A  ->  y  e.  q ) ).
7::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  q  e.  A ).
8:7,6:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  y  e.  q ).
9:7,1:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  [ q  /  x ] Tr  x ).
10:7,9:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  Tr  q ).
11:10,3,8:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  z  e.  q ).
12:11:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  ( q  e.  A  ->  z  e.  q ) ).
13:12:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  A. q ( q  e.  A  ->  z  e.  q ) ).
14:13:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  A. q  e.  A z  e.  q ).
15:3,14:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  z  e.  |^| A ).
16:15:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->  z  e.  |^| A ) ).
17:16:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->  z  e.  |^| A ) ).
18:17:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  Tr  |^| A ).
qed:18:  |-  ( A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->  Tr  |^| A )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x  e.  A  Tr  x  ->  Tr  |^| A )
 
TheoremtrintALT 28657* The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise 5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. trintALT 28657 is an alternative proof of trint 4128. trintALT 28657 is trintALTVD 28656 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trintALTVD 28656 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x  e.  A  Tr  x  ->  Tr  |^| A )
 
Theoremundif3VD 28658 The first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Virtual deduction proof of undif3 3429. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. undif3 3429 is undif3VD 28658 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from undif3VD 28658.
1::  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  ( B  \  C ) ) )
2::  |-  ( x  e.  ( B  \  C )  <->  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) )
3:2:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
4:1,3:  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
5::  |-  (. x  e.  A  ->.  x  e.  A ).
6:5:  |-  (. x  e.  A  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B ) ).
7:5:  |-  (. x  e.  A  ->.  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ).
8:6,7:  |-  (. x  e.  A  ->.  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) ).
9:8:  |-  ( x  e.  A  ->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  (  -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
10::  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ).
11:10:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  x  e.  B ).
12:10:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  -.  x  e.  C  ).
13:11:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B ) ).
14:12:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ).
15:13,14:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) ).
16:15:  |-  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
17:9,16:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) )  ->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
18::  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ).
19:18:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  x  e.  A ).
20:18:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  -.  x  e.  C  ).
21:18:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) ).
22:21:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
23::  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A ) ).
24:23:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  x  e.  A ).
25:24:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) ).
26:25:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  (  x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
27:10:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) ).
28:27:  |-  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
29::  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A ) ).
30:29:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  x  e.  A ).
31:30:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) ).
32:31:  |-  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  (  x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
33:22,26:  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A ) )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
34:28,32:  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A ) )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
35:33,34:  |-  ( ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A ) )  \/  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A ) ) )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
36::  |-  ( ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A ) )  \/  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A ) ) )  <->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
37:36,35:  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
38:17,37:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) )  <->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
39::  |-  ( x  e.  ( C  \  A )  <->  ( x  e.  C  /\  -.  x  e.  A ) )
40:39:  |-  ( -.  x  e.  ( C  \  A )  <->  -.  ( x  e.  C  /\  -.  x  e.  A ) )
41::  |-  ( -.  ( x  e.  C  /\  -.  x  e.  A )  <->  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) )
42:40,41:  |-  ( -.  x  e.  ( C  \  A )  <->  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) )
43::  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  B )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B  ) )
44:43,42:  |-  ( ( x  e.  ( A  u.  B )  /\  -.  x  e.  ( C  \  A )  )  <->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  /\  x  e.  A ) ) )
45::  |-  ( x  e.  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) )  <->  (  x  e.  ( A  u.  B )  /\  -.  x  e.  ( C  \  A ) ) )
46:45,44:  |-  ( x  e.  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) )  <->  (  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
47:4,38:  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
48:46,47:  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  x  e.  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) ) )
49:48:  |-  A. x ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  x  e.  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) ) )
qed:49:  |-  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  =  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  =  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C 
 \  A ) )
 
TheoremsbcssVD 28659 Virtual deduction proof of sbcss 3564. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcss 3564 is sbcssVD 28659 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcssVD 28659.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  <->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C ) ).
3:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D  <->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ).
4:2,3:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  ->  [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D  ) ) ).
5:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  ->  [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D ) ) ).
6:4,5:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
7:6:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A. y ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
8:7:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( A. y [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  A. y ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D )  ) ).
9:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  A. y [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D ) ) ).
10:8,9:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  A. y ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D )  ) ).
11::  |-  ( C  C_  D  <->  A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D ) )
110:11:  |-  A. x ( C  C_  D  <->  A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D ) )
12:1,110:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D ) ) ).
13:10,12:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  A. y ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
14::  |-  ( [_ A  /  x ]_ C  C_  [_ A  /  x ]_ D  <->  A.  y ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
15:13,14:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  C_  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ).
qed:15:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  [_  A  /  x ]_ C  C_  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  C_  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
 
TheoremcsbingVD 28660 Virtual deduction proof of csbing 3376. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbing 3376 is csbingVD 28660 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbingVD 28660.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2::  |-  ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  }
20:2:  |-  A. x ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) }
30:1,20:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) } ).
3:1,30:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  [_ A  /  x ]_ { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) } ).
4:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) }  =  { y  |  [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) } ).
5:3,4:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) } ).
6:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  <->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C ) ).
7:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D  <->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ).
8:6,7:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  /\  [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D )  ) ).
9:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  /\  [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D ) ) ).
10:9,8:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
11:10:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A. y ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
12:11:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  { y  |  [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) }  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) } ).
13:5,12:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) } ).
14::  |-  ( [_ A  /  x ]_ C  i^i  [_ A  /  x ]_ D )  =  {  y  |  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) }
15:13,14:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  ( [_ A  /  x ]_ C  i^i  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ).
qed:15:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  (  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  i^i  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  ( [_ A  /  x ]_ C  i^i  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
 
TheoremonfrALTlem5VD 28661* Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem5 28307. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem5 28307 is onfrALTlem5VD 28661 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem5VD 28661.
1::  |-  a  e.  _V
2:1:  |-  ( a  i^i  x )  e.  _V
3:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  ( a  i^i  x )  =  (/) )
4:3:  |-  ( -.  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  -.  ( a  i^i  x )  =  (/) )
5::  |-  ( ( a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/)  <->  -.  ( a  i^i  x  )  =  (/) )
6:4,5:  |-  ( -.  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  ( a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/) )
7:2:  |-  ( -.  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. -.  b  =  (/) )
8::  |-  ( b  =/=  (/)  <->  -.  b  =  (/) )
9:8:  |-  A. b ( b  =/=  (/)  <->  -.  b  =  (/) )
10:2,9:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/)  <->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. -.  b  =  (/) )
11:7,10:  |-  ( -.  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/) )
12:6,11:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/)  <->  (  a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/) )
13:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  C_  ( a  i^i  x  )  <->  ( a  i^i  x )  C_  ( a  i^i  x ) )
14:12,13:  |-  ( ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/) )  <->  ( ( a  i^i  x )  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/) ) )
15:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  b  =/=  (/) )  <->  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/) ) )
16:15,14:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  b  =/=  (/) )  <->  ( ( a  i^i  x )  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/) ) )
17:2:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ ( b  i^i  y )  =  (  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ b  i^i  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ y )
18:2:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ b  =  ( a  i^i  x )
19:2:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ y  =  y
20:18,19:  |-  ( [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ b  i^i  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ y )  =  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )
21:17,20:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ ( b  i^i  y )  =  ( (  a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )
22:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ ( b  i^i  y )  =  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_  (/) )
23:2:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ (/)  =  (/)
24:21,23:  |-  ( [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ ( b  i^i  y )  =  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ (/)  <->  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) )
25:22,24:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) )
26:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. y  e.  b  <->  y  e.  ( a  i^i  x ) )
27:25,26:  |-  ( ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. y  e.  b  /\  [.  ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( y  e.  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( (  a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
28:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. y  e.  b  /\  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
29:27,28:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( y  e.  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
30:29:  |-  A. y ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( y  e.  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
31:30:  |-  ( E. y [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  E. y ( y  e.  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
32::  |-  ( E. y  e.  ( a  i^i  x ) ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  E. y ( y  e.  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/)  ) )
33:31,32:  |-  ( E. y [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  E. y  e.  ( a  i^i  x ) ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) )
34:2:  |-  ( E. y [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. E. y ( y  e.  b  /\  (  b  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
35:33,34:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. E. y ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  E. y  e.  ( a  i^i  x ) ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y  )  =  (/) )
36::  |-  ( E. y  e.  b ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  E. y  ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
37:36:  |-  A. b ( E. y  e.  b ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  E. y ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
38:2,37:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. E. y  e.  b ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. E. y ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
39:35,38:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. E. y  e.  b ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  E. y  e.  ( a  i^i  x ) ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) )
40:16,39:  |-  ( ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  b  =/=  (/) )  ->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. E. y  e.  b ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( ( ( a  i^i  x )  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/) )  ->  E. y  e.  ( a  i^i  x ) ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
41:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( ( b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  b  =/=  (/) )  ->  E. y  e.  b ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  b  =/=  (/) )  ->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. E. y  e.  b ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )