HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer
Theorem List (p. 290 of 328)
< Previous  Next >
Browser slow? Try the
Unicode version.

Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  MPE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Color key:    Metamath Proof Explorer  Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-21514)
  Hilbert Space Explorer  Hilbert Space Explorer
(21515-23037)
  Users' Mathboxes  Users' Mathboxes
(23038-32776)
 

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28901-29000   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
Theoremuun123p4 28901 A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ch  /\  ps  /\  ph )  ->  th )   =>    |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )
 
Theoremuun2221 28902 A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ph  /\  ( ps  /\  ph ) )  ->  ch )   =>    |-  ( ( ps  /\  ph )  ->  ch )
 
Theoremuun2221p1 28903 A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ( ps 
 /\  ph )  /\  ph )  ->  ch )   =>    |-  ( ( ps  /\  ph )  ->  ch )
 
Theoremuun2221p2 28904 A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ps  /\  ph )  /\  ph  /\  ph )  ->  ch )   =>    |-  ( ( ps  /\  ph )  ->  ch )
 
Theorem3impdirp1 28905 A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. 3impdir 1238 is ~? uun3132 and is in set.mm. 3impdirp1 28905 is ~? uun3132p1. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ch  /\  ps )  /\  ( ph  /\ 
 ps ) )  ->  th )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  /\  ch  /\ 
 ps )  ->  th )
 
Theorem3impcombi 28906 A 1-hypothesis propositional calculus deduction (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Sep-2017.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ph )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ( ps  /\  ph 
 /\  ch )  ->  th )
 
Theorem3imp231 28907 Importation inference. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ( ps  /\  ch 
 /\  ph )  ->  th )
 
18.25.6  Theorems proved using virtual deduction
 
TheoremtrsspwALT 28908 Virtual deduction proof of the left-to-right implication of dftr4 4134. A transitive class is a subset of its power class. This proof corresponds to the virtual deduction proof of dftr4 4134 without accumulating results. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Tr  A  ->  A  C_  ~P A )
 
TheoremtrsspwALT2 28909 Virtual deduction proof of trsspwALT 28908. This proof is the same as the proof of trsspwALT 28908 except each virtual deduction symbol is replaced by its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A transitive class is a subset of its power class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Tr  A  ->  A  C_  ~P A )
 
TheoremtrsspwALT3 28910 Short predicate calculus proof of the left-to-right implication of dftr4 4134. A transitive class is a subset of its power class. This proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to the proof of trsspwALT2 28909, which is the virtual deduction proof trsspwALT 28908 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Tr  A  ->  A  C_  ~P A )
 
Theoremsspwtr 28911 Virtual deduction proof of the right-to-left implication of dftr4 4134. A class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. This proof corresponds to the virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 28911 without accumulating results. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 2-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  C_  ~P A  ->  Tr  A )
 
TheoremsspwtrALT 28912 Virtual deduction proof of sspwtr 28911. This proof is the same as the proof of sspwtr 28911 except each virtual deduction symbol is replaced by its non-virtual deduction symbol equivalent. A class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  C_  ~P A  ->  Tr  A )
 
TheoremsspwtrALT2 28913 Short predicate calculus proof of the right-to-left implication of dftr4 4134. A class which is a subclass of its power class is transitive. This proof was constructed by applying Metamath's minimize command to the proof of sspwtrALT 28912, which is the virtual deduction proof sspwtr 28911 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  C_  ~P A  ->  Tr  A )
 
TheorempwtrVD 28914 Virtual deduction proof of pwtrOLD 28915. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Tr  A  ->  Tr  ~P A )
 
TheorempwtrOLD 28915 The power class of a transitive class is transitive. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from pwtrVD 28914 using a tools command file, translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Moved into main set.mm as pwtr 4242 and may be deleted by mathbox owner, AS. --NM 15-Jun-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Tr  A  ->  Tr  ~P A )
 
TheorempwtrrVD 28916 Virtual deduction proof of pwtrrOLD 28917. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( Tr  ~P A  ->  Tr  A )
 
TheorempwtrrOLD 28917 A set is transitive if its power set is. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from pwtrrVD 28916 using a tools command file, translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Moved into main set.mm as pwtr 4242 and may be deleted by mathbox owner, AS. --NM 15-Jun-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( Tr  ~P A  ->  Tr  A )
 
TheoremsnssiALTVD 28918 Virtual deduction proof of snssiALT 28919. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  { A }  C_  B )
 
TheoremsnssiALT 28919 If a class is an element of another class, then its singleton is a subclass of that other class. Alternate proof of snssi 3775. This theorem was automatically generated from snssiALTVD 28918 using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  { A }  C_  B )
 
TheoremsnsslVD 28920 Virtual deduction proof of snssl 28921. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( { A }  C_  B  ->  A  e.  B )
 
Theoremsnssl 28921 If a singleton is a subclass of another class, then the singleton's element is an element of that other class. This theorem is the right-to-left implication of the biconditional snss 3761. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from snsslVD 28920 using a tools command file, translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  ( { A }  C_  B  ->  A  e.  B )
 
TheoremsnelpwrVD 28922 Virtual deduction proof of snelpwi 4236. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  { A }  e.  ~P B )
 
TheoremsnelpwrOLD 28923 If a class is contained in another class, then its singleton is contained in the power class of that other class. This theorem is the left-to-right implication of the biconditional snelpw 4237. Unlike snelpw 4237, 
A may be a proper class. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from snelpwrVD 28922 using a tools command file, translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Moved to snelpwi 4236 in main set.mm and may be deleted by mathbox owner, AS. --NM 10-Sep-2013.) (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  { A }  e.  ~P B )
 
TheoremunipwrVD 28924 Virtual deduction proof of unipwr 28925. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  C_ 
 U. ~P A
 
Theoremunipwr 28925 A class is a subclass of the union of its power class. This theorem is the right-to-left subclass lemma of unipw 4240. The proof of this theorem was automatically generated from unipwrVD 28924 using a tools command file , translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  C_ 
 U. ~P A
 
TheoremsstrALT2VD 28926 Virtual deduction proof of sstrALT2 28927. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  C_  B  /\  B  C_  C )  ->  A  C_  C )
 
TheoremsstrALT2 28927 Virtual deduction proof of sstr 3200, transitivity of subclasses, Theorem 6 of [Suppes] p. 23. This theorem was automatically generated from sstrALT2VD 28926 using the command file translatewithout_overwriting.cmd . It was not minimized because the automated minimization excluding duplicates generates a minimized proof which, although not directly containing any duplicates, indirectly contains a duplicate. That is, the trace back of the minimized proof contains a duplicate. This is undesirable because some step(s) of the minimized proof use the proven theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  C_  B  /\  B  C_  C )  ->  A  C_  C )
 
TheoremsuctrALT2VD 28928 Virtual deduction proof of suctrALT2 28929. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Tr  A  ->  Tr  suc  A )
 
TheoremsuctrALT2 28929 Virtual deduction proof of suctr 4491. The sucessor of a transitive class is transitive. This proof was generated automatically from the virtual deduction proof suctrALT2VD 28928 using the tools command file translatewithout_overwritingminimize_excludingduplicates.cmd . (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Tr  A  ->  Tr  suc  A )
 
Theoremelex2VD 28930* Virtual deduction proof of elex2 2813. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  E. x  x  e.  B )
 
Theoremelex22VD 28931* Virtual deduction proof of elex22 2812. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  e.  B  /\  A  e.  C ) 
 ->  E. x ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  C ) )
 
Theoremeqsbc3rVD 28932* Virtual deduction proof of eqsbc3r 3061. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ]. C  =  x  <->  C  =  A ) )
 
Theoremzfregs2VD 28933* Virtual deduction proof of zfregs2 7431. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  =/=  (/)  ->  -.  A. x  e.  A  E. y ( y  e.  A  /\  y  e.  x )
 )
 
Theoremtpid3gVD 28934 Virtual deduction proof of tpid3g 3754. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  A  e.  { C ,  D ,  A }
 )
 
Theoremen3lplem1VD 28935* Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem1 7432. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  e.  B  /\  B  e.  C  /\  C  e.  A )  ->  ( x  =  A  ->  E. y ( y  e.  { A ,  B ,  C }  /\  y  e.  x ) ) )
 
Theoremen3lplem2VD 28936* Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem2 7433. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  e.  B  /\  B  e.  C  /\  C  e.  A )  ->  ( x  e.  { A ,  B ,  C }  ->  E. y
 ( y  e.  { A ,  B ,  C }  /\  y  e.  x ) ) )
 
Theoremen3lpVD 28937 Virtual deduction proof of en3lp 7434. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  -.  ( A  e.  B  /\  B  e.  C  /\  C  e.  A )
 
18.25.7  Theorems proved using virtual deduction with mmj2 assistance
 
Theoremsimplbi2VD 28938 Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2 608. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
h1::  |-  ( ph  <->  ( ps  /\  ch ) )
3:1,?: e0_ 28861  |-  ( ( ps  /\  ch )  ->  ph )
qed:3,?: e0_ 28861  |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( ps  /\  ch ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ph ) )
 
Theorem3ornot23VD 28939 Virtual deduction proof of 3ornot23 28569. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::
 |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps ) ).
3:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  -.  ph ).
4:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  -.  ps ).
5:3,4,?: e11 28765  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  -.  ( ph  \/  ps ) ).
6:2,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ( ph  \/  ps ) ) ).
7:5,6,?: e12 28813  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->.  ch ).
8:7:  |-  (. ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->  ch ) ).
qed:8:  |-  ( ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->  ch ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( -.  ph  /\  -.  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  \/  ph  \/  ps )  ->  ch ) )
 
Theoremorbi1rVD 28940 Virtual deduction proof of orbi1r 28570. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ph ) ).
3:2,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph )  ->.  ( ph  \/  ch ) ).
4:1,3,?: e12 28813  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph )  ->.  ( ps  \/  ch ) ).
5:4,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ph )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ps ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  \/  ph )  ->  ( ch  \/  ps ) ) ).
7::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ps ) ).
8:7,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ps  \/  ch ) ).
9:1,8,?: e12 28813  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ph  \/  ch ) ).
10:9,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  \/  ps )  ->.  ( ch  \/  ph ) ).
11:10:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  \/  ps )  ->  ( ch  \/  ph ) ) ).
12:6,11,?: e11 28765  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  \/  ph )  <->  ( ch  \/  ps ) ) ).
qed:12:  |-  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  \/  ph )  <->  ( ch  \/  ps ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  (
 ( ch  \/  ph ) 
 <->  ( ch  \/  ps ) ) )
 
Theorembitr3VD 28941 Virtual deduction proof of bitr3 28571. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ps  <->  ph ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ph  <->  ch )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ch ) ).
4:3,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ph  <->  ch )  ->.  ( ch  <->  ph ) ).
5:2,4,?: e12 28813  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ph  <->  ch )  ->.  ( ps  <->  ch ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ph  <->  ch )  ->  ( ps  <->  ch ) ) ).
qed:6:  |-  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( ( ph  <->  ch )  ->  ( ps  <->  ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  (
 ( ph  <->  ch )  ->  ( ps 
 <->  ch ) ) )
 
Theorem3orbi123VD 28942 Virtual deduction proof of 3orbi123 28572. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
3:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
4:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ta  <->  et ) ).
5:2,3,?: e11 28765  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  \/  ch )  <->  ( ps  \/  th ) ) ).
6:5,4,?: e11 28765  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ( ph  \/  ch )  \/  ta )  <->  ( ( ps  \/  th )  \/  et ) ) ).
7:?:  |-  ( ( ( ph  \/  ch )  \/  ta )  <->  ( ph  \/  ch  \/  ta ) )
8:6,7,?: e10 28772  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  \/  ch  \/  ta )  <->  ( ( ps  \/  th )  \/  et ) ) ).
9:?:  |-  ( ( ( ps  \/  th )  \/  et )  <->  ( ps  \/  th  \/  et ) )
10:8,9,?: e10 28772  |-  (. ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  \/  ch  \/  ta )  <->  ( ps  \/  th  \/  et ) ) ).
qed:10:  |-  ( ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch  <->  th )  /\  ( ta  <->  et ) )  ->  ( ( ph  \/  ch  \/  ta )  <->  ( ps  \/  th  \/  et ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  <->  ps )  /\  ( ch 
 <-> 
 th )  /\  ( ta 
 <->  et ) )  ->  ( ( ph  \/  ch 
 \/  ta )  <->  ( ps  \/  th 
 \/  et ) ) )
 
Theoremsbc3orgVD 28943 Virtual deduction proof of sbc3org 28594. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
3::  |-  ( ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch ) )
32:3:  |-  A. x ( ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch ) )
33:1,32,?: e10 28772  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch ) ) ).
4:1,33,?: e11 28765  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  ch )  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch ) ) ).
5:2,4,?: e11 28765  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
6:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps ) ) ).
7:6,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch )  <->  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
8:5,7,?: e11 28765  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
9:?:  |-  ( ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps )  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )
10:8,9,?: e10 28772  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
qed:10:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  \/  ps  \/  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  \/  [. A  /  x ]. ps  \/  [. A  /  x ].
 ch ) ) )
 
Theorem19.21a3con13vVD 28944* Virtual deduction proof of alrim3con13v 28595. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph )  ->.  ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch ) ).
3:2,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ps ).
4:2,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ph ).
5:2,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ch ).
6:1,4,?: e12 28813  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  A. x ph ).
7:3,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  A. x ps ).
8:5,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  A. x ch ).
9:7,6,8,?: e222 28713  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  ( A. x ps  /\  A. x ph  /\  A. x ch ) ).
10:9,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph ) ,. ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->.  A. x ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch ) ).
11:10:in2  |-  (. ( ph  ->  A. x ph )  ->.  ( ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->  A. x ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch ) ) ).
qed:11:in1  |-  ( ( ph  ->  A. x ph )  ->  ( ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->  A. x ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  ->  A. x ph )  ->  ( ( ps  /\  ph  /\  ch )  ->  A. x ( ps 
 /\  ph  /\  ch )
 ) )
 
TheoremexbirVD 28945 Virtual deduction proof of exbir 1355. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,.  ( ph  /\  ps )  ->.  ( ph  /\  ps ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,.  ( ph  /\  ps ) ,  th  ->.  th ).
5:1,2,?: e12 28813  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,  ( ph  /\  ps )  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
6:3,5,?: e32 28847  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,  ( ph  /\  ps ) ,  th  ->.  ch ).
7:6:  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ,  ( ph  /\  ps )  ->.  ( th  ->  ch ) ).
8:7:  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ).
9:8,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ) ).
qed:9:  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch )
 ) ) )
 
TheoremexbiriVD 28946 Virtual deduction proof of exbiri 605. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
h1::  |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )
2::  |-  (. ph  ->.  ph ).
3::  |-  (. ph ,. ps  ->.  ps ).
4::  |-  (. ph ,. ps ,. th  ->.  th ).
5:2,1,?: e10 28772  |-  (. ph  ->.  ( ps  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) ) ).
6:3,5,?: e21 28819  |-  (. ph ,. ps  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
7:4,6,?: e32 28847  |-  (. ph ,. ps ,. th  ->.  ch ).
8:7:  |-  (. ph ,. ps  ->.  ( th  ->  ch ) ).
9:8:  |-  (. ph  ->.  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ).
qed:9:  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  <->  th ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) )
 
Theoremrspsbc2VD 28947* Virtual deduction proof of rspsbc2 28596. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D  ->.  C  e.  D ).
3::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph ).
4:1,3,?: e13 28837  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. A. y  e.  D ph ).
5:1,4,?: e13 28837  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. y  e.  D [. A  /  x ]. ph ).
6:2,5,?: e23 28844  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ]. ph ).
7:6:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. C  e.  D  ->.  ( A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->  [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ]. ph ) ).
8:7:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( C  e.  D  ->  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ]. ph ) ) ).
qed:8:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( C  e.  D  ->  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ]. ph ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( C  e.  D  ->  (
 A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D  ph  -> 
 [. C  /  y ]. [. A  /  x ].
 ph ) ) )
 
Theorem3impexpVD 28948 Virtual deduction proof of 3impexp 1356. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th ) ).
2::  |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  <->  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  /\  ch ) )
3:1,2,?: e10 28772  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->.  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps )  /\  ch )  ->  th ) ).
4:3,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ).
5:4,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ) ).
6:5:  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ) )
7::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ) ).
8:7,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ).
9:8,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps )  /\  ch )  ->  th ) ).
10:2,9,?: e01 28768  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th ) ).
11:10:  |-  ( ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )  ->  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th ) )
qed:6,11,?: e00 28857  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  th )  <->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\ 
 ch )  ->  th )  <->  (
 ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th )
 ) ) )
 
Theorem3impexpbicomVD 28949 Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicom 1357. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) ) ).
2::  |-  ( ( th  <->  ta )  <->  ( ta  <->  th ) )
3:1,2,?: e10 28772  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ).
4:3,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) ).
5:4:  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) )
6::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) ).
7:6,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ).
8:7,2,?: e10 28772  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )  ->.  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) ) ).
9:8:  |-  ( ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )  ->  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) ) )
qed:5,9,?: e00 28857  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )  <->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\ 
 ch )  ->  ( th 
 <->  ta ) )  <->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) ) )
 
Theorem3impexpbicomiVD 28950 Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 1358. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
h1::  |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )
qed:1,?: e0_ 28861  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ps  /\  ch )  ->  ( th  <->  ta ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  <->  th ) ) ) )
 
TheoremsbcoreleleqVD 28951* Virtual deduction proof of sbcoreleleq 28597. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. x  e.  y  <->  x  e.  A ) ).
3:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. y  e.  x  <->  A  e.  x ) ).
4:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. x  =  y  <->  x  =  A ) ).
5:2,3,4,?: e111 28751  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  A  e.  x  \/  x  =  A )  <->  ( [. A  /  y ]. x  e.  y  \/  [. A  /  y ]. y  e.  x  \/  [. A  /  y ]. x  =  y ) ) ).
6:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  <->  ( [. A  /  y ]. x  e.  y  \/  [. A  /  y ]. y  e.  x  \/  [. A  /  y ]. x  =  y ) ) ).
7:5,6: e11 28765  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  A  e.  x  \/  x  =  A ) ) ).
qed:7:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  A  e.  x  \/  x  =  A ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y
 ) 
 <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  A  e.  x  \/  x  =  A )
 ) )
 
Theoremhbra2VD 28952* Virtual deduction proof of nfra2 2610. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  ( A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph  ->  A. y A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
2::  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  <->  A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
3:1,2,?: e00 28857  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  ->  A. y A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
4:2:  |-  A. y ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  <->  A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
5:4,?: e0_ 28861  |-  ( A. y A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  <->  A. y A. y  e.  B A. x  e.  A ph )
qed:3,5,?: e00 28857  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph  ->  A. y A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  B ph )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  B  ph  ->  A. y A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  B  ph )
 
TheoremtratrbVD 28953* Virtual deduction proof of tratrb 28598. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  A ).
3:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
4:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  B  e.  A ).
5::  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ).
6:5,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  x  e.  y ).
7:5,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  y  e.  B ).
8:2,7,4,?: e121 28733  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  y  e.  A ).
9:2,6,8,?: e122 28730  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  x  e.  A ).
10::  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  B  e.  x  ->.  B  e.  x ).
11:6,7,10,?: e223 28712  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  B  e.  x  ->.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B  /\  B  e.  x ) ).
12:11:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  ( B  e.  x  ->  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B  /\  B  e.  x ) ) ).
13::  |-  -.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B  /\  B  e.  x )
14:12,13,?: e20 28816  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  -.  B  e.  x ).
15::  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  x  =  B  ->.  x  =  B ).
16:7,15,?: e23 28844  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  x  =  B  ->.  y  e.  x ).
17:6,16,?: e23 28844  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B ) ,  x  =  B  ->.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x ) ).
18:17:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  ( x  =  B  ->  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x ) ) ).
19::  |-  -.  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )
20:18,19,?: e20 28816  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  -.  x  =  B ).
21:3,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. y  e.  A  A. x  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
22:21,9,4,?: e121 28733  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  [. x  /  x ]. [. B  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
23:22,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  [. B  /  y ]. ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
24:4,23,?: e12 28813  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  ( x  e.  B  \/  B  e.  x  \/  x  =  B ) ).
25:14,20,24,?: e222 28713  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) ,  ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->.  x  e.  B ).
26:25:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  ( ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->  x  e.  B ) ).
27::  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  ->  A. y A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
28:27,?: e0_ 28861  |-  ( ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  A. y ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) )
29:28,26:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. y ( ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->  x  e.  B ) ).
30::  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  ->  A. x A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
31:30,?: e0_ 28861  |-  ( ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  A. x ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) )
32:31,29:  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  A. y ( ( x  e.  y  /\  y  e.  B )  ->  x  e.  B ) ).
33:32,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  B ).
qed:33:  |-  ( ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  Tr  B )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A  ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y )  /\  B  e.  A ) 
 ->  Tr  B )
 
Theorem3ax5VD 28954 Virtual deduction proof of 3ax5 28599. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( A. x ph  ->  A. x ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
3::  |-  ( A. x ( ps  ->  ch )  ->  ( A. x ps  ->  A. x ch ) )
4:2,3,?: e10 28772  |-  (. A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( A. x ph  ->  ( A. x ps  ->  A. x ch ) ) ).
qed:4:  |-  ( A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->  ( A. x ph  ->  ( A. x ps  ->  A. x ch ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch )
 )  ->  ( A. x ph  ->  ( A. x ps  ->  A. x ch ) ) )
 
Theoremsyl5impVD 28955 Virtual deduction proof of syl5imp 28573. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
2:1,?: e1_ 28704  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( ps  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ,. ( th  ->  ps )  ->.  ( th  ->  ps ) ).
4:3,2,?: e21 28819  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ,. ( th  ->  ps )  ->.  ( th  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) ) ).
5:4,?: e2 28708  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ,. ( th  ->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( ( th  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ) ).
qed:6:  |-  ( ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->  ( ( th  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ch ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  ->  ( ps 
 ->  ch ) )  ->  ( ( th  ->  ps )  ->  ( ph  ->  ( th  ->  ch )
 ) ) )
 
TheoremidiVD 28956 Virtual deduction proof of idi 2. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
h1::  |-  ph
qed:1,?: e0_ 28861  |-  ph
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ph   =>    |-  ph
 
TheoremancomsimpVD 28957 Closed form of ancoms 439. The following user's proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
1::  |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  <->  ( ps  /\  ph ) )
qed:1,?: e0_ 28861  |-  ( ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ch )  <->  ( ( ps  /\  ph )  ->  ch ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ch )  <->  ( ( ps 
 /\  ph )  ->  ch )
 )
 
Theoremssralv2VD 28958* Quantification restricted to a subclass for two quantifiers. ssralv 3250 for two quantifiers. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ssralv2 28593 is ssralv2VD 28958 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ssralv2VD 28958.
1::  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->.  ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph ).
3:1:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->.  A  C_  B ).
4:3,2:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  D ph ).
5:4:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x ( x  e.  A  ->  A. y  e.  D ph ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  ( x  e.  A  ->  A. y  e.  D ph ) ).
7::  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph ,  x  e.  A  ->.  x  e.  A ).
8:7,6:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph ,  x  e.  A  ->.  A. y  e.  D ph ).
9:1:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->.  C  C_  D ).
10:9,8:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph ,  x  e.  A  ->.  A. y  e.  C ph ).
11:10:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  ( x  e.  A  ->  A. y  e.  C ph ) ).
12::  |-  ( ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->  A. x ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) )
13::  |-  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  A. x A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph )
14:12,13,11:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x ( x  e.  A  ->  A. y  e.  C ph ) ).
15:14:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D ) ,. A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D ph  ->.  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  C ph ).
16:15:  |-  (. ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->.  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  C ph ) ).
qed:16:  |-  ( ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->  ( A. x  e.  B A. y  e.  D ph  ->  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  C ph ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( A  C_  B  /\  C  C_  D )  ->  ( A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  D  ph  ->  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  C  ph ) )
 
TheoremordelordALTVD 28959 An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 4430 using the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 7337. dford2 is a weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it need not be assumed that  _E  Fr  A because this is inferred by the Axiom of Regularity. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ordelordALT 28600 is ordelordALTVD 28959 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ordelordALTVD 28959 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command.
1::  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A ) ).
2:1:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Ord  A ).
3:1:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  B  e.  A ).
4:2:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  A ).
5:2:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) ).
6:4,3:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  B  C_  A ).
7:6,6,5:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  B ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) ).
8::  |-  ( ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
9:8:  |-  A. y ( ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
10:9:  |-  A. y  e.  A ( ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
11:10:  |-  ( A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
12:11:  |-  A. x ( A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
13:12:  |-  A. x  e.  A ( A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
14:13:  |-  ( A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x )  <->  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) )
15:14,5:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  y  e.  x  \/  x  =  y ) ).
16:4,15,3:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  B ).
17:16,7:  |-  (. ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->.  Ord  B ).
qed:17:  |-  ( ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  Ord  B )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( Ord  A  /\  B  e.  A )  ->  Ord  B )
 
TheoremequncomVD 28960 If a class equals the union of two other classes, then it equals the union of those two classes commuted. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncom 3333 is equncomVD 28960 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomVD 28960.
1::  |-  (. A  =  ( B  u.  C )  ->.  A  =  ( B  u.  C ) ).
2::  |-  ( B  u.  C )  =  ( C  u.  B )
3:1,2:  |-  (. A  =  ( B  u.  C )  ->.  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) ).
4:3:  |-  ( A  =  ( B  u.  C )  ->  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) )
5::  |-  (. A  =  ( C  u.  B )  ->.  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) ).
6:5,2:  |-  (. A  =  ( C  u.  B )  ->.  A  =  ( B  u.  C ) ).
7:6:  |-  ( A  =  ( C  u.  B )  ->  A  =  ( B  u.  C ) )
8:4,7:  |-  ( A  =  ( B  u.  C )  <->  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  =  ( B  u.  C )  <->  A  =  ( C  u.  B ) )
 
TheoremequncomiVD 28961 Inference form of equncom 3333. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 3334 is equncomiVD 28961 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 28961.
h1::  |-  A  =  ( B  u.  C )
qed:1:  |-  A  =  ( C  u.  B )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  =  ( B  u.  C )   =>    |-  A  =  ( C  u.  B )
 
TheoremsucidALTVD 28962 A set belongs to its successor. Alternate proof of sucid 4487. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucidALT 28963 is sucidALTVD 28962 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sucidALTVD 28962. This proof illustrates that completeusersproof.cmd will generate a Metamath proof from any User's Proof which is "conventional" in the sense that no step is a virtual deduction, provided that all necessary unification theorems and transformation deductions are in set.mm. completeusersproof.cmd automatically converts such a conventional proof into a Virtual Deduction proof for which each step happens to be a 0-virtual hypothesis virtual deduction. The user does not need to search for reference theorem labels or deduction labels nor does he(she) need to use theorems and deductions which unify with reference theorems and deductions in set.mm. All that is necessary is that each theorem or deduction of the User's Proof unifies with some reference theorem or deduction in set.mm or is a semantic variation of some theorem or deduction which unifies with some reference theorem or deduction in set.mm. The definition of "semantic variation" has not been precisely defined. If it is obvious that a theorem or deduction has the same meaning as another theorem or deduction, then it is a semantic variation of the latter theorem or deduction. For example, step 4 of the User's Proof is a semantic variation of the definition (axiom)  suc  A  =  ( A  u.  { A } ), which unifies with df-suc 4414, a reference definition (axiom) in set.mm. Also, a theorem or deduction is said to be a semantic variation of another theorem or deduction if it is obvious upon cursory inspection that it has the same meaning as a weaker form of the latter theorem or deduction. For example, the deduction  Ord  A infers  A. x  e.  A A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) is a semantic variation of the theorem  ( Ord  A  <->  ( Tr  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  A. y  e.  A ( x  e.  y  \/  x  =  y  \/  y  e.  x ) ) ), which unifies with the set.mm reference definition (axiom) dford2 7337.
h1::  |-  A  e.  _V
2:1:  |-  A  e.  { A }
3:2:  |-  A  e.  ( { A }  u.  A )
4::  |-  suc  A  =  ( { A }  u.  A )
qed:3,4:  |-  A  e.  suc  A
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  A  e.  suc  A
 
TheoremsucidALT 28963 A set belongs to its successor. This proof was automatically derived from sucidALTVD 28962 using translatewithout_overwriting.cmd and minimizing. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  A  e.  suc  A
 
TheoremsucidVD 28964 A set belongs to its successor. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucid 4487 is sucidVD 28964 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sucidVD 28964.
h1::  |-  A  e.  _V
2:1:  |-  A  e.  { A }
3:2:  |-  A  e.  ( A  u.  { A } )
4::  |-  suc  A  =  ( A  u.  { A } )
qed:3,4:  |-  A  e.  suc  A
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  A  e.  _V   =>    |-  A  e.  suc  A
 
Theoremimbi12VD 28965 Implication form of imbi12i 316. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi12 28581 is imbi12VD 28965 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from imbi12VD 28965.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ph  ->  ch )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ch ) ).
4:1,3:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ph  ->  ch )  ->.  ( ps  ->  ch ) ).
5:2,4:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ph  ->  ch )  ->.  ( ps  ->  th ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ( ph  ->  ch )  ->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) ).
7::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ps  ->  th )  ->.  ( ps  ->  th ) ).
8:1,7:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ps  ->  th )  ->.  ( ph  ->  th ) ).
9:2,8:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ps  ->  th )  ->.  ( ph  ->  ch ) ).
10:9:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ( ps  ->  th )  ->  ( ph  ->  ch ) ) ).
11:6,10:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ( ph  ->  ch )  <->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) ).
12:11:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  <->  th )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ch )  <->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) ) ).
qed:12:  |-  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  <->  th )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ch )  <->  ( ps  ->  th ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  (
 ( ch  <->  th )  ->  (
 ( ph  ->  ch )  <->  ( ps  ->  th )
 ) ) )
 
Theoremimbi13VD 28966 Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi13 28582 is imbi13VD 28966 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from imbi13VD 28966.
1::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
2::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ch  <->  th ) ).
3::  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ta  <->  et )  ->.  ( ta  <->  et ) ).
4:2,3:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ta  <->  et )  ->.  ( ( ch  ->  ta )  <->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ).
5:1,4:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th ) ,. ( ta  <->  et )  ->.  ( ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps ) ,. ( ch  <->  th )  ->.  ( ( ta  <->  et )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ) ).
7:6:  |-  (. ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( ( ch  <->  th )  ->  ( ( ta  <->  et )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ) ) ).
qed:7:  |-  ( ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( ( ch  <->  th )  ->  ( ( ta  <->  et )  ->  ( ( ph  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et ) ) ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  (
 ( ch  <->  th )  ->  (
 ( ta  <->  et )  ->  (
 ( ph  ->  ( ch 
 ->  ta ) )  <->  ( ps  ->  ( th  ->  et )
 ) ) ) ) )
 
Theoremsbcim2gVD 28967 Distribution of class substitution over a left-nested implication. Similar to sbcimg 3045. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcim2g 28601 is sbcim2gVD 28967 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcim2gVD 28967.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
3:1,2:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
4:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ps  ->  ch )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
5:3,4:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
6:5:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ) ).
7::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ).
8:4,7:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
9:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ) ).
10:8,9:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ).
11:10:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) )  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) ) ) ).
12:6,11:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ) ).
qed:12:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ps  ->  [. A  /  x ]. ch ) ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ch ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ].
 ps  ->  [. A  /  x ].
 ch ) ) ) )
 
TheoremsbcbiVD 28968 Implication form of sbcbiiOLD 3060. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcbi 28602 is sbcbiVD 28968 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcbiVD 28968.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2::  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  A. x ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
3:1,2:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( ph  <->  ps ) ).
4:1,3:  |-  (. A  e.  B ,. A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ps ) ).
5:4:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ps ) ) ).
qed:5:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ps ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 A. x ( ph  <->  ps )  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. A  /  x ].
 ps ) ) )
 
TheoremtrsbcVD 28969* Formula-building inference rule for class substitution, substituting a class variable for the set variable of the transitivity predicate. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. trsbc 28603 is trsbcVD 28969 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trsbcVD 28969.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  y  <->  z  e.  y ) ).
3:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  x  <->  y  e.  A ) ).
4:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  x  <->  z  e.  A ) ).
5:1,2,3,4:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  y  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  x  ->  [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  A  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ) ).
6:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  y  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  x  ->  [. A  /  x ]. z  e.  x ) ) ) ).
7:5,6:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  A  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ) ).
8::  |-  ( ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  A  ->  z  e.  A ) )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) )
9:7,8:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
10::  |-  ( ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) )
11:10:  |-  A. x ( ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) )
12:1,11:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( z  e.  y  ->  ( y  e.  x  ->  z  e.  x ) )  <->  [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) ) ).
13:9,12:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
14:13:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A. y ( [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
15:14:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( A. y [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
16:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. y [. A  /  x ]. ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) ) ).
17:15,16:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
18:17:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A. z ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
19:18:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( A. z [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
20:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. z A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. z [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) ) ).
21:19,20:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. z A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) ) ).
22::  |-  ( Tr  A  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  A ) )
23:21,22:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. z A. y ( (  z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x )  <->  Tr  A ) ).
24::  |-  ( Tr  x  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) )
25:24:  |-  A. x ( Tr  x  <->  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) )
26:1,25:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. Tr  x  <->  [. A  /  x ]. A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  x )  ->  z  e.  x ) ) ).
27:23,26:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. Tr  x  <->  Tr  A ) ).
qed:27:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. Tr  x  <->  Tr  A ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ].
 Tr  x  <->  Tr  A ) )
 
TheoremtruniALTVD 28970* The union of a class of transitive sets is transitive. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. truniALT 28604 is truniALTVD 28970 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from truniALTVD 28970.
1::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  A. x  e.  A  Tr  x ).
2::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ).
3:2:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  z  e.  y ).
4:2:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  y  e.  U. A ).
5:4:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  E. q ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A ) ).
6::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A ) ).
7:6:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  y  e.  q ).
8:6:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  q  e.  A ).
9:1,8:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  [ q  /  x ] Tr  x ).
10:8,9:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  Tr  q ).
11:3,7,10:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  z  e.  q ).
12:11,8:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A ) ,  ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->.  z  e.  U. A ).
13:12:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  ( ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
14:13:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  A. q ( ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
15:14:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  ( E. q ( y  e.  q  /\  q  e.  A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
16:5,15:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->.  z  e.  U. A ).
17:16:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
18:17:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  U. A )  ->  z  e.  U. A ) ).
19:18:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  Tr  U. A ).
qed:19:  |-  ( A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->  Tr  U. A )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x  e.  A  Tr  x  ->  Tr  U. A )
 
Theoremee33VD 28971 Non-virtual deduction form of e33 28823. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ee33 28583 is ee33VD 28971 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ee33VD 28971.
h1::  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th ) ) )
h2::  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) ) )
h3::  |-  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) )
4:1,3:  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) ) ) )
5:4:  |-  ( ta  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) )
6:2,5:  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) ) ) )
7:6:  |-  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) ) )
8:7:  |-  ( ch  ->  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) ) )
qed:8:  |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  th )
 ) )   &    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  ta ) ) )   &    |-  ( th  ->  ( ta  ->  et ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  ( ps  ->  ( ch  ->  et ) ) )
 
TheoremtrintALTVD 28972* The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Virtual deduction proof of trintALT 28973. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. trintALT 28973 is trintALTVD 28972 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trintALTVD 28972.
1::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  A. x  e.  A Tr  x ).
2::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ).
3:2:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  z  e.  y ).
4:2:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  y  e.  |^| A ).
5:4:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  A. q  e.  A y  e.  q ).
6:5:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  ( q  e.  A  ->  y  e.  q ) ).
7::  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  q  e.  A ).
8:7,6:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  y  e.  q ).
9:7,1:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  [ q  /  x ] Tr  x ).
10:7,9:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  Tr  q ).
11:10,3,8:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A ) ,  q  e.  A  ->.  z  e.  q ).
12:11:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  ( q  e.  A  ->  z  e.  q ) ).
13:12:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  A. q ( q  e.  A  ->  z  e.  q ) ).
14:13:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  A. q  e.  A z  e.  q ).
15:3,14:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x ,. ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->.  z  e.  |^| A ).
16:15:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->  z  e.  |^| A ) ).
17:16:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  A. z A. y ( ( z  e.  y  /\  y  e.  |^| A )  ->  z  e.  |^| A ) ).
18:17:  |-  (. A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->.  Tr  |^| A ).
qed:18:  |-  ( A. x  e.  A Tr  x  ->  Tr  |^| A )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x  e.  A  Tr  x  ->  Tr  |^| A )
 
TheoremtrintALT 28973* The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise 5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. trintALT 28973 is an alternative proof of trint 4144. trintALT 28973 is trintALTVD 28972 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from trintALTVD 28972 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A. x  e.  A  Tr  x  ->  Tr  |^| A )
 
Theoremundif3VD 28974 The first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Virtual deduction proof of undif3 3442. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. undif3 3442 is undif3VD 28974 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from undif3VD 28974.
1::  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  ( B  \  C ) ) )
2::  |-  ( x  e.  ( B  \  C )  <->  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) )
3:2:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
4:1,3:  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
5::  |-  (. x  e.  A  ->.  x  e.  A ).
6:5:  |-  (. x  e.  A  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B ) ).
7:5:  |-  (. x  e.  A  ->.  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ).
8:6,7:  |-  (. x  e.  A  ->.  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) ).
9:8:  |-  ( x  e.  A  ->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  (  -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
10::  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ).
11:10:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  x  e.  B ).
12:10:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  -.  x  e.  C  ).
13:11:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B ) ).
14:12:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ).
15:13,14:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) ).
16:15:  |-  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
17:9,16:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) )  ->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
18::  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ).
19:18:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  x  e.  A ).
20:18:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  -.  x  e.  C  ).
21:18:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) ).
22:21:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
23::  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A ) ).
24:23:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  x  e.  A ).
25:24:  |-  (. ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) ).
26:25:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  (  x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
27:10:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) ).
28:27:  |-  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
29::  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A ) ).
30:29:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  x  e.  A ).
31:30:  |-  (. ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A )  ->.  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) ).
32:31:  |-  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  (  x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
33:22,26:  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A ) )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
34:28,32:  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A ) )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
35:33,34:  |-  ( ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A ) )  \/  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A ) ) )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
36::  |-  ( ( ( ( x  e.  A  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  A  /\  x  e.  A ) )  \/  ( ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C )  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  x  e.  A ) ) )  <->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
37:36,35:  |-  ( ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) )  ->  ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) ) )
38:17,37:  |-  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  ( x  e.  B  /\  -.  x  e.  C ) )  <->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
39::  |-  ( x  e.  ( C  \  A )  <->  ( x  e.  C  /\  -.  x  e.  A ) )
40:39:  |-  ( -.  x  e.  ( C  \  A )  <->  -.  ( x  e.  C  /\  -.  x  e.  A ) )
41::  |-  ( -.  ( x  e.  C  /\  -.  x  e.  A )  <->  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) )
42:40,41:  |-  ( -.  x  e.  ( C  \  A )  <->  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) )
43::  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  B )  <->  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B  ) )
44:43,42:  |-  ( ( x  e.  ( A  u.  B )  /\  -.  x  e.  ( C  \  A )  )  <->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  /\  x  e.  A ) ) )
45::  |-  ( x  e.  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) )  <->  (  x  e.  ( A  u.  B )  /\  -.  x  e.  ( C  \  A ) ) )
46:45,44:  |-  ( x  e.  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) )  <->  (  ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
47:4,38:  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  ( ( x  e.  A  \/  x  e.  B )  /\  ( -.  x  e.  C  \/  x  e.  A ) ) )
48:46,47:  |-  ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  x  e.  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) ) )
49:48:  |-  A. x ( x  e.  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  <->  x  e.  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) ) )
qed:49:  |-  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  =  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C  \  A ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  u.  ( B  \  C ) )  =  ( ( A  u.  B )  \  ( C 
 \  A ) )
 
TheoremsbcssVD 28975 Virtual deduction proof of sbcss 3577. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sbcss 3577 is sbcssVD 28975 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sbcssVD 28975.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  <->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C ) ).
3:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D  <->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ).
4:2,3:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  ->  [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D  ) ) ).
5:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  ->  [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D ) ) ).
6:4,5:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
7:6:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A. y ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
8:7:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( A. y [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  A. y ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D )  ) ).
9:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  A. y [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D ) ) ).
10:8,9:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D )  <->  A. y ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D )  ) ).
11::  |-  ( C  C_  D  <->  A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D ) )
110:11:  |-  A. x ( C  C_  D  <->  A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D ) )
12:1,110:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  [. A  /  x ]. A. y ( y  e.  C  ->  y  e.  D ) ) ).
13:10,12:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  A. y ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
14::  |-  ( [_ A  /  x ]_ C  C_  [_ A  /  x ]_ D  <->  A.  y ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  ->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
15:13,14:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  C_  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ).
qed:15:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  ( [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  [_  A  /  x ]_ C  C_  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  (
 [. A  /  x ]. C  C_  D  <->  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  C_  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
 
TheoremcsbingVD 28976 Virtual deduction proof of csbing 3389. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. csbing 3389 is csbingVD 28976 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from csbingVD 28976.
1::  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A  e.  B ).
2::  |-  ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  }
20:2:  |-  A. x ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) }
30:1,20:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [. A  /  x ]. ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) } ).
3:1,30:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  [_ A  /  x ]_ { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) } ).
4:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ { y  |  ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) }  =  { y  |  [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) } ).
5:3,4:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) } ).
6:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  <->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C ) ).
7:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D  <->  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ).
8:6,7:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  /\  [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D )  ) ).
9:1:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  <->  ( [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  C  /\  [. A  /  x ]. y  e.  D ) ) ).
10:9,8:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
11:10:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  A. y ( [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D )  <->  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ) ).
12:11:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  { y  |  [. A  /  x ]. ( y  e.  C  /\  y  e.  D ) }  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) } ).
13:5,12:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  { y  |  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) } ).
14::  |-  ( [_ A  /  x ]_ C  i^i  [_ A  /  x ]_ D )  =  {  y  |  ( y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  /\  y  e.  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) }
15:13,14:  |-  (. A  e.  B  ->.  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  ( [_ A  /  x ]_ C  i^i  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) ).
qed:15:  |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  (  [_ A  /  x ]_ C  i^i  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( A  e.  B  ->  [_ A  /  x ]_ ( C  i^i  D )  =  ( [_ A  /  x ]_ C  i^i  [_ A  /  x ]_ D ) )
 
TheoremonfrALTlem5VD 28977* Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem5 28606. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. onfrALTlem5 28606 is onfrALTlem5VD 28977 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from onfrALTlem5VD 28977.
1::  |-  a  e.  _V
2:1:  |-  ( a  i^i  x )  e.  _V
3:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  ( a  i^i  x )  =  (/) )
4:3:  |-  ( -.  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  -.  ( a  i^i  x )  =  (/) )
5::  |-  ( ( a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/)  <->  -.  ( a  i^i  x  )  =  (/) )
6:4,5:  |-  ( -.  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  ( a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/) )
7:2:  |-  ( -.  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. -.  b  =  (/) )
8::  |-  ( b  =/=  (/)  <->  -.  b  =  (/) )
9:8:  |-  A. b ( b  =/=  (/)  <->  -.  b  =  (/) )
10:2,9:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/)  <->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. -.  b  =  (/) )
11:7,10:  |-  ( -.  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =  (/)  <->  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/) )
12:6,11:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/)  <->  (  a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/) )
13:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  C_  ( a  i^i  x  )  <->  ( a  i^i  x )  C_  ( a  i^i  x ) )
14:12,13:  |-  ( ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/) )  <->  ( ( a  i^i  x )  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/) ) )
15:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  b  =/=  (/) )  <->  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. b  =/=  (/) ) )
16:15,14:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  b  =/=  (/) )  <->  ( ( a  i^i  x )  C_  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( a  i^i  x )  =/=  (/) ) )
17:2:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ ( b  i^i  y )  =  (  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ b  i^i  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ y )
18:2:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ b  =  ( a  i^i  x )
19:2:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ y  =  y
20:18,19:  |-  ( [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ b  i^i  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ y )  =  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )
21:17,20:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ ( b  i^i  y )  =  ( (  a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )
22:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ ( b  i^i  y )  =  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_  (/) )
23:2:  |-  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ (/)  =  (/)
24:21,23:  |-  ( [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ ( b  i^i  y )  =  [_ ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]_ (/)  <->  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) )
25:22,24:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) )
26:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. y  e.  b  <->  y  e.  ( a  i^i  x ) )
27:25,26:  |-  ( ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. y  e.  b  /\  [.  ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( y  e.  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( (  a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
28:2:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. y  e.  b  /\  [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
29:27,28:  |-  ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( y  e.  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
30:29:  |-  A. y ( [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  ( y  e.  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
31:30:  |-  ( E. y [. ( a  i^i  x )  /  b ]. ( y  e.  b  /\  ( b  i^i  y )  =  (/) )  <->  E. y ( y  e.  ( a  i^i  x )  /\  ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/) ) )
32::  |-  ( E. y  e.  ( a  i^i  x ) ( ( a  i^i  x )  i^i  y )  =  (/)  <->  E. y