HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer
Theorem List (p. 295 of 329)
< Previous  Next >
Browser slow? Try the
Unicode version.

Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  MPE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Color key:    Metamath Proof Explorer  Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-22423)
  Hilbert Space Explorer  Hilbert Space Explorer
(22424-23946)
  Users' Mathboxes  Users' Mathboxes
(23947-32824)
 

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 29401-29500   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
Theorembnj1034 29401* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( f `  (/) )  = 
 pred ( X ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   &    |-  ( ze 
 <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  z  e.  (
 f `  i )
 ) )   &    |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/) } )   &    |-  K  =  { f  |  E. n  e.  D  (
 f  Fn  n  /\  ph 
 /\  ps ) }   &    |-  ( E. f E. n E. i ( th  /\  ta 
 /\  ch  /\  ze )  ->  z  e.  B )   =>    |-  ( ( th  /\  ta )  ->  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B )
 
Theorembnj1039 29402 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ps 
 <-> 
 A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ps )   =>    |-  ( ps'  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1040 29403* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ph )   &    |-  ( ps'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ps )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) )   &    |-  ( ch'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ch )   =>    |-  ( ch'  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph'  /\  ps' ) )
 
Theorembnj1047 29404 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( rh 
 <-> 
 A. j  e.  n  ( j  _E  i  -> 
 [. j  /  i ]. et ) )   &    |-  ( et'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. et )   =>    |-  ( rh  <->  A. j  e.  n  ( j  _E  i  ->  et' ) )
 
Theorembnj1049 29405 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ze 
 <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  z  e.  (
 f `  i )
 ) )   &    |-  ( et  <->  ( ( th  /\ 
 ta  /\  ch  /\  ze )  ->  z  e.  B ) )   =>    |-  ( A. i  e.  n  et  <->  A. i et )
 
Theorembnj1052 29406* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( f `  (/) )  = 
 pred ( X ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   &    |-  ( ze 
 <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  z  e.  (
 f `  i )
 ) )   &    |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/) } )   &    |-  K  =  { f  |  E. n  e.  D  (
 f  Fn  n  /\  ph 
 /\  ps ) }   &    |-  ( et 
 <->  ( ( th  /\  ta 
 /\  ch  /\  ze )  ->  z  e.  B ) )   &    |-  ( rh  <->  A. j  e.  n  ( j  _E  i  -> 
 [. j  /  i ]. et ) )   &    |-  (
 ( th  /\  ta  /\  ch 
 /\  ze )  ->  (  _E  Fr  n  /\  A. i  e.  n  ( rh  ->  et ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ( th  /\  ta )  ->  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B )
 
Theorembnj1053 29407* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( f `  (/) )  = 
 pred ( X ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   &    |-  ( ze 
 <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  z  e.  (
 f `  i )
 ) )   &    |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/) } )   &    |-  K  =  { f  |  E. n  e.  D  (
 f  Fn  n  /\  ph 
 /\  ps ) }   &    |-  ( et 
 <->  ( ( th  /\  ta 
 /\  ch  /\  ze )  ->  z  e.  B ) )   &    |-  ( rh  <->  A. j  e.  n  ( j  _E  i  -> 
 [. j  /  i ]. et ) )   &    |-  (
 ( th  /\  ta  /\  ch 
 /\  ze )  ->  A. i  e.  n  ( rh  ->  et ) )   =>    |-  ( ( th  /\ 
 ta )  ->  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B )
 
Theorembnj1071 29408 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/)
 } )   =>    |-  ( n  e.  D  ->  _E  Fr  n )
 
Theorembnj1083 29409 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps )
 )   &    |-  K  =  { f  |  E. n  e.  D  ( f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) }   =>    |-  ( f  e.  K  <->  E. n ch )
 
Theorembnj1090 29410* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( et 
 <->  ( ( f  e.  K  /\  i  e. 
 dom  f )  ->  ( f `  i
 )  C_  B )
 )   &    |-  ( rh  <->  A. j  e.  n  ( j  _E  i  -> 
 [. j  /  i ]. et ) )   &    |-  ( et'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. et )   &    |-  ( si  <->  ( ( j  e.  n  /\  j  _E  i )  ->  et' ) )   &    |-  ( ph0  <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  si  /\  f  e.  K  /\  i  e.  dom  f ) )   &    |-  ( ( th  /\ 
 ta  /\  ch  /\  ze )  ->  A. i E. j
 ( ph0  ->  ( f `  i )  C_  B ) )   =>    |-  ( ( th  /\  ta 
 /\  ch  /\  ze )  ->  A. i  e.  n  ( rh  ->  et )
 )
 
Theorembnj1093 29411* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  E. j
 ( ( ( th  /\ 
 ta  /\  ch )  /\  ph0 )  ->  (
 f `  i )  C_  B )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) )   =>    |-  ( ( th  /\  ta 
 /\  ch  /\  ze )  ->  A. i E. j
 ( ph0  ->  ( f `  i )  C_  B ) )
 
Theorembnj1097 29412 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( f `  (/) )  = 
 pred ( X ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   =>    |-  ( ( i  =  (/)  /\  ( ( th  /\  ta  /\  ch )  /\  ph0 ) )  ->  ( f `  i
 )  C_  B )
 
Theorembnj1110 29413* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps )
 )   &    |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/) } )   &    |-  ( si 
 <->  ( ( j  e.  n  /\  j  _E  i )  ->  et' ) )   &    |-  ( ph0  <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  si  /\  f  e.  K  /\  i  e.  dom  f ) )   &    |-  ( et'  <->  ( ( f  e.  K  /\  j  e.  dom  f )  ->  ( f `  j
 )  C_  B )
 )   =>    |- 
 E. j ( ( i  =/=  (/)  /\  (
 ( th  /\  ta  /\  ch )  /\  ph0 ) ) 
 ->  ( j  e.  n  /\  i  =  suc  j  /\  ( f `  j )  C_  B ) )
 
Theorembnj1112 29414* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ps 
 <-> 
 A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  <->  A. j ( ( j  e.  om  /\  suc  j  e.  n ) 
 ->  ( f `  suc  j )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  j
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1118 29415* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ps 
 <-> 
 A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   &    |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/)
 } )   &    |-  ( si  <->  ( ( j  e.  n  /\  j  _E  i )  ->  et' ) )   &    |-  ( ph0  <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  si  /\  f  e.  K  /\  i  e.  dom  f ) )   &    |-  ( et'  <->  ( ( f  e.  K  /\  j  e.  dom  f )  ->  ( f `  j
 )  C_  B )
 )   =>    |- 
 E. j ( ( i  =/=  (/)  /\  (
 ( th  /\  ta  /\  ch )  /\  ph0 ) ) 
 ->  ( f `  i
 )  C_  B )
 
Theorembnj1121 29416 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( th 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  X  e.  A )
 )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps )
 )   &    |-  ( ze  <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  z  e.  ( f `  i
 ) ) )   &    |-  ( et 
 <->  ( ( f  e.  K  /\  i  e. 
 dom  f )  ->  ( f `  i
 )  C_  B )
 )   &    |-  ( ( th  /\  ta 
 /\  ch  /\  ze )  ->  A. i  e.  n  et )   &    |-  K  =  {
 f  |  E. n  e.  D  ( f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) }   =>    |-  ( ( th  /\  ta 
 /\  ch  /\  ze )  ->  z  e.  B )
 
Theorembnj1123 29417* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ps 
 <-> 
 A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  K  =  {
 f  |  E. n  e.  D  ( f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) }   &    |-  ( et  <->  ( ( f  e.  K  /\  i  e.  dom  f )  ->  ( f `  i
 )  C_  B )
 )   &    |-  ( et'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. et )   =>    |-  ( et'  <->  ( ( f  e.  K  /\  j  e.  dom  f )  ->  ( f `  j
 )  C_  B )
 )
 
Theorembnj1030 29418* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( f `  (/) )  = 
 pred ( X ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   &    |-  ( ze 
 <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  z  e.  (
 f `  i )
 ) )   &    |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/) } )   &    |-  K  =  { f  |  E. n  e.  D  (
 f  Fn  n  /\  ph 
 /\  ps ) }   &    |-  ( et 
 <->  ( ( f  e.  K  /\  i  e. 
 dom  f )  ->  ( f `  i
 )  C_  B )
 )   &    |-  ( rh  <->  A. j  e.  n  ( j  _E  i  -> 
 [. j  /  i ]. et ) )   &    |-  ( ph'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ph )   &    |-  ( ps'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ps )   &    |-  ( ch'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ch )   &    |-  ( th'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. th )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ta )   &    |-  ( ze'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ze )   &    |-  ( et'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. et )   &    |-  ( si  <->  ( ( j  e.  n  /\  j  _E  i )  ->  et' ) )   &    |-  ( ph0  <->  ( i  e.  n  /\  si  /\  f  e.  K  /\  i  e.  dom  f ) )   =>    |-  ( ( th  /\  ta )  ->  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B )
 
Theorembnj1124 29419 Property of  trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( th 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  X  e.  A )
 )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   =>    |-  ( ( th  /\ 
 ta )  ->  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B )
 
Theorembnj1133 29420* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/)
 } )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  A. j  e.  n  ( j  _E  i  -> 
 [. j  /  i ]. th ) )   &    |-  (
 ( i  e.  n  /\  ta )  ->  th )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  A. i  e.  n  th )
 
Theorembnj1128 29421* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( f `  (/) )  = 
 pred ( X ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/) } )   &    |-  B  =  { f  |  E. n  e.  D  (
 f  Fn  n  /\  ph 
 /\  ps ) }   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps )
 )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( ch  ->  ( f `  i ) 
 C_  A ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  A. j  e.  n  ( j  _E  i  -> 
 [. j  /  i ]. th ) )   &    |-  ( ph'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ph )   &    |-  ( ps'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ps )   &    |-  ( ch'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. ch )   &    |-  ( th'  <->  [. j  /  i ]. th )   =>    |-  ( Y  e.  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  ->  Y  e.  A )
 
Theorembnj1127 29422 Property of  trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Y  e.  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  ->  Y  e.  A )
 
Theorembnj1125 29423 Property of  trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( R  FrSe  A  /\  X  e.  A  /\  Y  e.  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R ) )  ->  trCl ( Y ,  A ,  R )  C_  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R ) )
 
Theorembnj1145 29424* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( f `  (/) )  = 
 pred ( X ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  A. i  e.  om  ( suc  i  e.  n  ->  ( f `  suc  i )  =  U_ y  e.  ( f `  i
 )  pred ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  ( om  \  { (/) } )   &    |-  B  =  { f  |  E. n  e.  D  (
 f  Fn  n  /\  ph 
 /\  ps ) }   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( n  e.  D  /\  f  Fn  n  /\  ph  /\  ps )
 )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( ( i  =/=  (/)  /\  i  e.  n  /\  ch )  /\  ( j  e.  n  /\  i  =  suc  j ) ) )   =>    |-  trCl
 ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  A
 
Theorembnj1147 29425 Property of  trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  A
 
Theorembnj1137 29426* Property of  trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  (  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  u.  U_ y  e.  trCl  ( X ,  A ,  R )  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) )   =>    |-  ( ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A )  ->  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )
 )
 
Theorembnj1148 29427 Property of  pred. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( R  FrSe  A  /\  X  e.  A )  -> 
 pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  e.  _V )
 
Theorembnj1136 29428* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  (  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  u.  U_ y  e.  trCl  ( X ,  A ,  R )  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   =>    |-  ( ( R 
 FrSe  A  /\  X  e.  A )  ->  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  =  B )
 
Theorembnj1152 29429 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( Y  e.  pred ( X ,  A ,  R ) 
 <->  ( Y  e.  A  /\  Y R X ) )
 
Theorembnj1154 29430* Property of  Fr. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( R  Fr  A  /\  B  C_  A  /\  B  =/=  (/)  /\  B  e.  _V )  ->  E. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  B  -.  y R x )
 
Theorembnj1171 29431 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  B  C_  A )   &    |-  E. z A. w ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  (
 z  e.  B  /\  ( w  e.  A  ->  ( w R z 
 ->  -.  w  e.  B ) ) ) )   =>    |-  E. z A. w ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( z  e.  B  /\  ( w  e.  B  ->  -.  w R z ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1172 29432 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  C  =  (  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  i^i  B )   &    |-  E. z A. w ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  (
 ( ph  /\  ps  /\  z  e.  C )  /\  ( th  ->  ( w R z  ->  -.  w  e.  B ) ) ) )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps  /\  z  e.  C )  ->  ( th  <->  w  e.  A ) )   =>    |-  E. z A. w ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( z  e.  B  /\  ( w  e.  A  ->  ( w R z  ->  -.  w  e.  B ) ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1173 29433 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  C  =  (  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  i^i  B )   &    |-  ( th 
 <->  ( ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A  /\  z  e.  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R ) )  /\  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  z  e.  A )  /\  w  e.  A ) )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  R  FrSe  A )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  X  e.  A )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps  /\  z  e.  C ) 
 ->  ( th  <->  w  e.  A ) )
 
Theorembnj1174 29434 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  C  =  (  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  i^i  B )   &    |-  E. z A. w ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  (
 z  e.  C  /\  ( th  ->  ( w R z  ->  -.  w  e.  C ) ) ) )   &    |-  ( th  ->  ( w R z  ->  w  e.  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R ) ) )   =>    |-  E. z A. w ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  (
 ( ph  /\  ps  /\  z  e.  C )  /\  ( th  ->  ( w R z  ->  -.  w  e.  B ) ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1175 29435 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  C  =  (  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  i^i  B )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A  /\  z  e.  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R ) )  /\  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  z  e.  A )  /\  ( w  e.  A  /\  w R z ) ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( ( R 
 FrSe  A  /\  X  e.  A  /\  z  e.  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R ) )  /\  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  z  e.  A )  /\  w  e.  A ) )   =>    |-  ( th  ->  ( w R z  ->  w  e.  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )
 ) )
 
Theorembnj1176 29436* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( R  Fr  A  /\  C  C_  A  /\  C  =/=  (/)  /\  C  e.  _V ) )   &    |-  ( ( R  Fr  A  /\  C  C_  A  /\  C  =/=  (/)  /\  C  e.  _V )  ->  E. z  e.  C  A. w  e.  C  -.  w R z )   =>    |-  E. z A. w ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  (
 z  e.  C  /\  ( th  ->  ( w R z  ->  -.  w  e.  C ) ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1177 29437 Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( X  e.  B  /\  y  e.  B  /\  y R X ) )   &    |-  C  =  ( 
 trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  i^i  B )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  R  FrSe  A )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  B  C_  A )   &    |-  ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  X  e.  A )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  ( R  Fr  A  /\  C  C_  A  /\  C  =/=  (/)  /\  C  e.  _V ) )
 
Theorembnj1186 29438* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  E. z A. w ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  (
 z  e.  B  /\  ( w  e.  B  ->  -.  w R z ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  /\ 
 ps )  ->  E. z  e.  B  A. w  e.  B  -.  w R z )
 
Theorembnj1190 29439* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  B  C_  A  /\  B  =/= 
 (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( x  e.  B  /\  y  e.  B  /\  y R x ) )   =>    |-  ( ( ph  /\  ps )  ->  E. w  e.  B  A. z  e.  B  -.  z R w )
 
Theorembnj1189 29440* Technical lemma for bnj69 29441. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  B  C_  A  /\  B  =/= 
 (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( x  e.  B  /\  y  e.  B  /\  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  A. y  e.  B  -.  y R x )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  E. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  B  -.  y R x )
 
19.25.3  The existence of a minimal element in certain classes
 
Theorembnj69 29441* Existence of a minimal element in certain classes: if  R is well-founded and set-like on 
A, then every non-empty subclass of  A has a minimal element. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 ( R  FrSe  A  /\  B  C_  A  /\  B  =/= 
 (/) )  ->  E. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  B  -.  y R x )
 
Theorembnj1228 29442* Existence of a minimal element in certain classes: if  R is well-founded and set-like on 
A, then every non-empty subclass of  A has a minimal element. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( w  e.  B  ->  A. x  w  e.  B )   =>    |-  ( ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  B  C_  A  /\  B  =/=  (/) )  ->  E. x  e.  B  A. y  e.  B  -.  y R x )
 
19.25.4  Well-founded induction
 
Theorembnj1204 29443* Well-founded induction. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ps 
 <-> 
 A. y  e.  A  ( y R x 
 ->  [. y  /  x ].
 ph ) )   =>    |-  ( ( R 
 FrSe  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  ( ps  ->  ph ) )  ->  A. x  e.  A  ph )
 
Theorembnj1234 29444* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  Y  =  <. x ,  (
 f  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  ( f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  (
 g  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  D  =  { g  |  E. d  e.  B  ( g  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( g `  x )  =  ( G `  Z ) ) }   =>    |-  C  =  D
 
Theorembnj1245 29445* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   &    |-  E  =  { x  e.  D  |  ( g `  x )  =/=  ( h `  x ) }   &    |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C  /\  ( g  |`  D )  =/=  ( h  |`  D ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  x  e.  E  /\  A. y  e.  E  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( h  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  K  =  { h  |  E. d  e.  B  ( h  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( h `  x )  =  ( G `  Z ) ) }   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  dom  h  C_  A )
 
Theorembnj1256 29446* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   &    |-  E  =  { x  e.  D  |  ( g `  x )  =/=  ( h `  x ) }   &    |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C  /\  ( g  |`  D )  =/=  ( h  |`  D ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  x  e.  E  /\  A. y  e.  E  -.  y R x ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  E. d  e.  B  g  Fn  d )
 
Theorembnj1259 29447* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   &    |-  E  =  { x  e.  D  |  ( g `  x )  =/=  ( h `  x ) }   &    |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C  /\  ( g  |`  D )  =/=  ( h  |`  D ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  x  e.  E  /\  A. y  e.  E  -.  y R x ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  E. d  e.  B  h  Fn  d )
 
Theorembnj1253 29448* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   &    |-  E  =  { x  e.  D  |  ( g `  x )  =/=  ( h `  x ) }   &    |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C  /\  ( g  |`  D )  =/=  ( h  |`  D ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  x  e.  E  /\  A. y  e.  E  -.  y R x ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  E  =/=  (/) )
 
Theorembnj1279 29449* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   &    |-  E  =  { x  e.  D  |  ( g `  x )  =/=  ( h `  x ) }   &    |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C  /\  ( g  |`  D )  =/=  ( h  |`  D ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  x  e.  E  /\  A. y  e.  E  -.  y R x ) )   =>    |-  ( ( x  e.  E  /\  A. y  e.  E  -.  y R x )  ->  (  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  i^i  E )  =  (/) )
 
Theorembnj1286 29450* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   &    |-  E  =  { x  e.  D  |  ( g `  x )  =/=  ( h `  x ) }   &    |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C  /\  ( g  |`  D )  =/=  ( h  |`  D ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  x  e.  E  /\  A. y  e.  E  -.  y R x ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  D )
 
Theorembnj1280 29451* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   &    |-  E  =  { x  e.  D  |  ( g `  x )  =/=  ( h `  x ) }   &    |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C  /\  ( g  |`  D )  =/=  ( h  |`  D ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  x  e.  E  /\  A. y  e.  E  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  (  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  i^i  E )  =  (/) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  (
 g  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )  =  ( h  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )
 
Theorembnj1296 29452* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   &    |-  E  =  { x  e.  D  |  ( g `  x )  =/=  ( h `  x ) }   &    |-  ( ph 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C  /\  ( g  |`  D )  =/=  ( h  |`  D ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  x  e.  E  /\  A. y  e.  E  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ps  ->  ( g  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) )  =  ( h  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( g  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  K  =  { g  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 g  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( g `  x )  =  ( G `  Z ) ) }   &    |-  W  =  <. x ,  ( h  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  L  =  { h  |  E. d  e.  B  ( h  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( h `  x )  =  ( G `  W ) ) }   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  ( g `  x )  =  ( h `  x ) )
 
Theorembnj1309 29453* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   =>    |-  ( w  e.  B  ->  A. x  w  e.  B )
 
Theorembnj1307 29454* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( w  e.  B  ->  A. x  w  e.  B )   =>    |-  ( w  e.  C  ->  A. x  w  e.  C )
 
Theorembnj1311 29455* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   =>    |-  ( ( R 
 FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C )  ->  (
 g  |`  D )  =  ( h  |`  D ) )
 
Theorembnj1318 29456 Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( X  =  Y  ->  trCl
 ( X ,  A ,  R )  =  trCl ( Y ,  A ,  R ) )
 
Theorembnj1326 29457* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  D  =  ( dom  g  i^i 
 dom  h )   =>    |-  ( ( R 
 FrSe  A  /\  g  e.  C  /\  h  e.  C )  ->  (
 g  |`  D )  =  ( h  |`  D ) )
 
Theorembnj1321 29458* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  E. f ta )  ->  E! f ta )
 
Theorembnj1364 29459 Property of  FrSe. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( R  FrSe  A  ->  R  Se  A )
 
Theorembnj1371 29460* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( {
 y }  u.  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( f  e.  H  ->  Fun  f )
 
Theorembnj1373 29461* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ].
 ta )   =>    |-  ( ta'  <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { y }  u.  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1374 29462* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   =>    |-  ( f  e.  H  ->  f  e.  C )
 
Theorembnj1384 29463* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   =>    |-  ( R  FrSe  A  ->  Fun  P )
 
Theorembnj1388 29464* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  A. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) E. f ta' )
 
Theorembnj1398 29465* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  ( th 
 <->  ( ch  /\  z  e.  U_ y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ( {
 y }  u.  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  ( et  <->  ( th  /\  y  e.  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  /\  z  e.  ( { y }  u.  trCl
 ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  U_ y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ( { y }  u.  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) )  =  dom  P )
 
Theorembnj1413 29466* Property of  trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  (  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  u.  U_ y  e.  pred  ( X ,  A ,  R )  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) )   =>    |-  ( ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A )  ->  B  e.  _V )
 
Theorembnj1408 29467* Technical lemma for bnj1414 29468. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  (  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  u.  U_ y  e.  pred  ( X ,  A ,  R )  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) )   &    |-  C  =  ( 
 pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  u.  U_ y  e.  trCl  ( X ,  A ,  R )  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A ) )   &    |-  ( ta  <->  ( B  e.  _V 
 /\  TrFo ( B ,  A ,  R )  /\  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  C_  B ) )   =>    |-  ( ( R 
 FrSe  A  /\  X  e.  A )  ->  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  =  B )
 
Theorembnj1414 29468* Property of  trCl. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  (  pred ( X ,  A ,  R )  u.  U_ y  e.  pred  ( X ,  A ,  R )  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) )   =>    |-  ( ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  X  e.  A )  ->  trCl ( X ,  A ,  R )  =  B )
 
Theorembnj1415 29469* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  dom  P  =  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) )
 
Theorembnj1416 29470 Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  dom 
 P  =  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  dom 
 Q  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1418 29471 Property of  pred. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  (
 y  e.  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  ->  y R x )
 
Theorembnj1417 29472* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  ( ph 
 <->  R  FrSe  A )   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  -.  x  e.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <-> 
 A. y  e.  A  ( y R x 
 ->  [. y  /  x ].
 ps ) )   &    |-  ( th 
 <->  ( ph  /\  x  e.  A  /\  ch )
 )   &    |-  B  =  (  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  u.  U_ y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R )  trCl ( y ,  A ,  R ) )   =>    |-  ( ph  ->  A. x  e.  A  -.  x  e.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) )
 
Theorembnj1421 29473* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  Fun 
 P )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  dom 
 Q  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  dom  P  =  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  Fun 
 Q )
 
Theorembnj1444 29474* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  E  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  P  Fn  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  Fn  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( ch  /\  z  e.  E )
 )   &    |-  ( et  <->  ( th  /\  z  e.  { x } ) )   &    |-  ( ze 
 <->  ( th  /\  z  e.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   &    |-  ( rh  <->  ( ze  /\  f  e.  H  /\  z  e.  dom  f ) )   =>    |-  ( rh  ->  A. y rh )
 
Theorembnj1445 29475* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  E  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  P  Fn  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  Fn  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( ch  /\  z  e.  E )
 )   &    |-  ( et  <->  ( th  /\  z  e.  { x } ) )   &    |-  ( ze 
 <->  ( th  /\  z  e.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   &    |-  ( rh  <->  ( ze  /\  f  e.  H  /\  z  e.  dom  f ) )   &    |-  ( si  <->  ( rh  /\  y  e.  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  /\  f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { y }  u.  trCl
 ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  ( ph  <->  ( si  /\  d  e.  B  /\  f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  (
 f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) )   &    |-  X  =  <. z ,  (
 f  |`  pred ( z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   =>    |-  ( si  ->  A. d si )
 
Theorembnj1446 29476* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   =>    |-  ( ( Q `
  z )  =  ( G `  W )  ->  A. d ( Q `
  z )  =  ( G `  W ) )
 
Theorembnj1447 29477* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   =>    |-  ( ( Q `
  z )  =  ( G `  W )  ->  A. y ( Q `
  z )  =  ( G `  W ) )
 
Theorembnj1448 29478* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   =>    |-  ( ( Q `
  z )  =  ( G `  W )  ->  A. f ( Q `
  z )  =  ( G `  W ) )
 
Theorembnj1449 29479* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  E  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  P  Fn  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  Fn  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( ch  /\  z  e.  E )
 )   &    |-  ( et  <->  ( th  /\  z  e.  { x } ) )   &    |-  ( ze 
 <->  ( th  /\  z  e.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ze  ->  A. f ze )
 
Theorembnj1442 29480* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  E  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  P  Fn  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  Fn  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( ch  /\  z  e.  E )
 )   &    |-  ( et  <->  ( th  /\  z  e.  { x } ) )   =>    |-  ( et  ->  ( Q `  z )  =  ( G `  W ) )
 
Theorembnj1450 29481* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  E  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  P  Fn  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  Fn  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   &    |-  ( th  <->  ( ch  /\  z  e.  E )
 )   &    |-  ( et  <->  ( th  /\  z  e.  { x } ) )   &    |-  ( ze 
 <->  ( th  /\  z  e.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   &    |-  ( rh  <->  ( ze  /\  f  e.  H  /\  z  e.  dom  f ) )   &    |-  ( si  <->  ( rh  /\  y  e.  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  /\  f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { y }  u.  trCl
 ( y ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  ( ph  <->  ( si  /\  d  e.  B  /\  f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  (
 f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) )   &    |-  X  =  <. z ,  (
 f  |`  pred ( z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   =>    |-  ( ze  ->  ( Q `  z )  =  ( G `  W ) )
 
Theorembnj1423 29482* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  E  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  P  Fn  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  Fn  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  A. z  e.  E  ( Q `  z )  =  ( G `  W ) )
 
Theorembnj1452 29483* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  E  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  E  e.  B )
 
Theorembnj1466 29484* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   =>    |-  ( w  e.  Q  ->  A. f  w  e.  Q )
 
Theorembnj1467 29485* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   =>    |-  ( w  e.  Q  ->  A. d  w  e.  Q )
 
Theorembnj1463 29486* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  E  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  e.  _V )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  A. z  e.  E  ( Q `  z )  =  ( G `  W ) )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  Fn  E )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  E  e.  B )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  e.  C )
 
Theorembnj1489 29487* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   =>    |-  ( ch  ->  Q  e.  _V )
 
Theorembnj1491 29488* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  ( ch  ->  ( Q  e.  C  /\  dom 
 Q  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   =>    |-  ( ( ch  /\  Q  e.  _V )  ->  E. f ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1312 29489* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  ( ta 
 <->  ( f  e.  C  /\  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) ) )   &    |-  D  =  { x  e.  A  |  -.  E. f ta }   &    |-  ( ps 
 <->  ( R  FrSe  A  /\  D  =/=  (/) ) )   &    |-  ( ch 
 <->  ( ps  /\  x  e.  D  /\  A. y  e.  D  -.  y R x ) )   &    |-  ( ta'  <->  [. y  /  x ]. ta )   &    |-  H  =  {
 f  |  E. y  e.  pred  ( x ,  A ,  R ) ta'
 }   &    |-  P  =  U. H   &    |-  Z  =  <. x ,  ( P  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >.   &    |-  Q  =  ( P  u.  { <. x ,  ( G `  Z )
 >. } )   &    |-  W  =  <. z ,  ( Q  |`  pred (
 z ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  E  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 )   =>    |-  ( R  FrSe  A  ->  A. x  e.  A  E. f  e.  C  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) )
 
Theorembnj1493 29490* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   =>    |-  ( R  FrSe  A  ->  A. x  e.  A  E. f  e.  C  dom  f  =  ( { x }  u.  trCl ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) )
 
Theorembnj1497 29491* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   =>    |-  A. g  e.  C  Fun  g
 
Theorembnj1498 29492* Technical lemma for bnj60 29493. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  F  =  U. C   =>    |-  ( R  FrSe  A  ->  dom 
 F  =  A )
 
19.25.5  Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3
 
Theorembnj60 29493* Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  F  =  U. C   =>    |-  ( R  FrSe  A  ->  F  Fn  A )
 
Theorembnj1514 29494* Technical lemma for bnj1500 29499. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   =>    |-  (
 f  e.  C  ->  A. x  e.  dom  f
 ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) )
 
Theorembnj1518 29495* Technical lemma for bnj1500 29499. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  F  =  U. C   &    |-  ( ph  <->  ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  x  e.  A ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  f  e.  C  /\  x  e. 
 dom  f ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  A. d ps )
 
Theorembnj1519 29496* Technical lemma for bnj1500 29499. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  F  =  U. C   =>    |-  ( ( F `  x )  =  ( G `  <. x ,  ( F  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >. )  ->  A. d
 ( F `  x )  =  ( G ` 
 <. x ,  ( F  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >. ) )
 
Theorembnj1520 29497* Technical lemma for bnj1500 29499. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  F  =  U. C   =>    |-  ( ( F `  x )  =  ( G `  <. x ,  ( F  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >. )  ->  A. f
 ( F `  x )  =  ( G ` 
 <. x ,  ( F  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >. ) )
 
Theorembnj1501 29498* Technical lemma for bnj1500 29499. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  F  =  U. C   &    |-  ( ph  <->  ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  x  e.  A ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  f  e.  C  /\  x  e. 
 dom  f ) )   &    |-  ( ch  <->  ( ps  /\  d  e.  B  /\  dom  f  =  d ) )   =>    |-  ( R  FrSe  A  ->  A. x  e.  A  ( F `  x )  =  ( G `  <. x ,  ( F  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >. ) )
 
19.25.6  Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3
 
Theorembnj1500 29499* Well-founded recursion, part 2 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  F  =  U. C   =>    |-  ( R  FrSe  A  ->  A. x  e.  A  ( F `  x )  =  ( G `  <. x ,  ( F  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >. ) )
 
Theorembnj1525 29500* Technical lemma for bnj1522 29503. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
 |-  B  =  { d  |  ( d  C_  A  /\  A. x  e.  d  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )  C_  d ) }   &    |-  Y  =  <. x ,  ( f  |`  pred
 ( x ,  A ,  R ) ) >.   &    |-  C  =  { f  |  E. d  e.  B  (
 f  Fn  d  /\  A. x  e.  d  ( f `  x )  =  ( G `  Y ) ) }   &    |-  F  =  U. C   &    |-  ( ph  <->  ( R  FrSe  A 
 /\  H  Fn  A  /\  A. x  e.  A  ( H `  x )  =  ( G `  <. x ,  ( H  |`  pred ( x ,  A ,  R )
 ) >. ) ) )   &    |-  ( ps  <->  ( ph  /\  F  =/=  H ) )   =>    |-  ( ps  ->  A. x ps )
    < Previous  Next >

Page List
Jump to page: Contents  1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-