Statement List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9501-9600 - Page 96 of 107
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Theorem | cmbr3 9501 |
Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach]
p. 23.
|

            |
| |
| Theorem | cmbr4 9502 |
Alternate definition for the commutes relation.
|

          |
| |
| Theorem | lecm 9503 |
Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of
[Beran] p. 40.
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | lecmi 9504 |
Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of
[Beran] p. 40.
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | cmj1 9505 |
A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join.
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | cmj2 9506 |
A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join.
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | cmm1 9507 |
A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet.
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | cmm2 9508 |
A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet.
|
   |
| |
| Theorem | cmbr3t 9509 |
Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach]
p. 23.
|
 


             |
| |
| Theorem | cm0t 9510 |
The zero Hilbert lattice element commutes with every element.
|

  |
| |
| Theorem | cmid 9511 |
The commutes relation is reflexive.
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | pjoml2t 9512 |
Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22.
|
 
           |
| |
| Theorem | pjoml3t 9513 |
Variation of orthomodular law.
|
 

            |
| |
| Theorem | pjoml5t 9514 |
The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach]
p. 22.
|
 

              |
| |
| Theorem | cmcmt 9515 |
Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22.
|
 


   |
| |
| Theorem | cmcm3t 9516 |
Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23.
|
 


       |
| |
| Theorem | cmcm2t 9517 |
Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39.
|
 


       |
| |
| Theorem | lecmt 9518 |
Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of
[Beran] p. 40.
|
 
   |
| |
| Foulis-Holland theorem |
| |
| Theorem | fh1t 9519 |
Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular
lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two
parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25.
|
  


   
 
 
      |
| |
| Theorem | fh2t 9520 |
Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular
lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two
parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25.
|
  


   
 
 
      |
| |
| Theorem | cm2jt 9521 |
A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their
join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49.
|
  


      |
| |
| Theorem | fh1 9522 |
Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular
lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two
parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25.
|
 
 
 
     |
| |
| Theorem | fh2 9523 |
Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular
lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two
parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25.
|
 
 
 
     |
| |
| Theorem | fh3 9524 |
Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem.
|
 
 
 
     |
| |
| Theorem | fh4 9525 |
Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem.
|
 
 
 
     |
| |
| Quantum Logic Explorer axioms |
| |
| Theorem | qlax1 9526 |
One of the equations showing is an ortholattice. (This
corresponds to axiom "ax-1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.)
|
         |
| |
| Theorem | qlax2 9527 |
One of the equations showing is an ortholattice. (This
corresponds to axiom "ax-2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.)
|

    |
| |
| Theorem | qlax3 9528 |
One of the equations showing is an ortholattice. (This
corresponds to axiom "ax-3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.)
|
   
     |
| |
| Theorem | qlax4 9529 |
One of the equations showing is an ortholattice. (This
corresponds to axiom "ax-4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.)
|

              |
| |
| Theorem | qlax5 9530 |
One of the equations showing is an ortholattice. (This
corresponds to axiom "ax-5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.)
|

            |
| |
| Theorem | qlaxr1 9531 |
One of the conditions showing is an ortholattice. (This
corresponds to axiom "ax-r1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.)
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | qlaxr2 9532 |
One of the conditions showing is an ortholattice. (This
corresponds to axiom "ax-r2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.)
|
 |
| |
| Theorem | qlaxr4 9533 |
One of the conditions showing is an ortholattice. (This
corresponds to axiom "ax-r4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.)
|
   
     |
| |
| Theorem | qlaxr5 9534 |
One of the conditions showing is an ortholattice. (This
corresponds to axiom "ax-r5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.)
|


   |
| |
| Theorem | qlaxr3 9535 |
A variation of the orthomodular law, showing is an orthomodular
lattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r3" in the Quantum
Logic
Explorer.)
|
                        
    |
| |
| Orthogonal subspaces |
| |
| Theorem | osumlem1 9536 |
Lemma for osum 9544.
|
| |
| Theorem | osumlem2 9537 |
Lemma for osum 9544.
|
| |
| Theorem | osumlem3 9538 |
Lemma for osum 9544.
|
| |
| Theorem | osumlem4 9539 |
Lemma for osum 9544.
|
| |
| Theorem | osumlem5 9540 |
Lemma for osum 9544.
|
| |
| Theorem | osumlem6 9541 |
Lemma for osum 9544.
|
| |
| Theorem | osumlem7 9542 |
Lemma for osum 9544.
|
| |
| Theorem | osumlem8 9543 |
Lemma for osum 9544.
|
| |
| Theorem | osum 9544 |
If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their
subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67.
Note that the Axiom of Choice is used for this proof (in osumlem5 9540
and via pjpjtht 9214 in osumlem7 9542).
|
     
     |
| |
| Theorem | osumcor 9545 |
Corollary of osum 9544.
|
 

          
       |
| |
| Theorem | osumt 9546 |
If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace
sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67.
|
 
           |
| |
| Theorem | chsot 9547 |
The subspace sum of a closed subspace and its complement is all of
Hilbert space.
|


       |
| |
| Theorem | osumcor2 9548 |
Corollary of osum 9544, showing it holds under the weaker hypothesis
that and commute.
|



    |
| |
| Theorem | spansnj 9549 |
The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace
equals their join. (Proof suggested by Eric Schechter 1-Jun-2004.)
|

                |
| |
| Theorem | spansnjt 9550 |
The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace
equals their join.
|
 

                  |
| |
| Theorem | spansnsclt 9551 |
The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace
is closed.
|
 

          |
| |
| Theorem | sumspansnt 9552 |
The sum of two vectors belong to the span of one of them iff the other
vector also belongs.
|
 

 
                |
| |
| Theorem | spansnm0 9553 |
The meet of different one-dimensional subspaces is the zero subspace.
|

     
      
         |
| |
| Theorem | nonbool 9554 |
A Hilbert lattice with two or more dimensions fails the distributive law
and therefore cannot be a Boolean algebra. This counterexample
demonstrates a condition where    
 
but     . The antecedent specifies that the
vectors and
are nonzero and
non-colinear. The last three
hypotheses assign one-dimensional subspaces to , , and
.
|
             |