| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Inference eliminating two antecedents. (The proof was shortened by Josh Purinton, 29-Dec-00.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61ii.1 |
|
| pm2.61ii.2 |
|
| pm2.61ii.3 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61ii |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm2.61ii.2 |
. 2
| |
| 2 | pm2.61ii.1 |
. . 3
| |
| 3 | pm2.61ii.3 |
. . 3
| |
| 4 | 2, 3 | pm2.61d2 129 |
. 2
|
| 5 | 1, 4 | pm2.61i 126 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: pm2.61iii 132 ecase3 749 hbae 1128 ax17eq 1195 ax17el 1196 sbequi 1212 sbcom 1242 sbcom2 1316 pssnn 4465 axextnd 4866 axunnd 4871 axpowndlem3 4874 axpownd 4876 axregndlem2 4878 axregnd 4879 axinfndlem1 4880 axinfnd 4881 alephadd 7475 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |