| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems Unicode version |
| Description: Deduction eliminating a conjunct. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm3.26bda.1 |
|
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm3.27bda |
|
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm3.26bda.1 |
. . 3
| |
| 2 | 1 | biimpa 418 |
. 2
|
| 3 | 2 | pm3.27d 325 |
1
|
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: |
| This theorem is referenced by: elfzuz3t 6479 clmi1 7086 ivthlem1 7281 tgclt 7623 tgval3t 7624 cldopn 7669 cnpimaex 7762 cnima 7764 cnclima 7768 sspba 8382 sspg 8383 ssps 8385 sspn 8391 lnolin 8411 nmblore 8442 phpar 8479 ubthlem3 8527 ubthlem10 8534 ubthlem11 8535 ocorth 9159 vidfunid 10728 iddvvidd 10729 idcvvidc 10730 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-an 225 |