HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem sbc2or 1929
Description: The disjunction of two equivalences for class substitution does not require a class existence hypothesis.
Assertion
Ref Expression
sbc2or |- (([A / x]ph <-> E.x(x = A /\ ph)) \/ ([A / x]ph <-> A.x(x = A -> ph)))
Distinct variable group:   x,A

Proof of Theorem sbc2or
StepHypRef Expression
1 sbc5g 1925 . . 3 |- (A e. V -> ([A / x]ph <-> E.x(x = A /\ ph)))
21orcd 272 . 2 |- (A e. V -> (([A / x]ph <-> E.x(x = A /\ ph)) \/ ([A / x]ph <-> A.x(x = A -> ph))))
3 pm5.15 663 . . 3 |- (([A / x]ph <-> E.x(x = A /\ ph)) \/ ([A / x]ph <-> -. E.x(x = A /\ ph)))
4 pm5.1 673 . . . . . 6 |- ((-. E.x(x = A /\ ph) /\ A.x(x = A -> ph)) -> (-. E.x(x = A /\ ph) <-> A.x(x = A -> ph)))
5 visset 1788 . . . . . . . . . 10 |- x e. V
6 eleq1 1510 . . . . . . . . . 10 |- (x = A -> (x e. V <-> A e. V))
75, 6mpbii 193 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (x = A -> A e. V)
87adantr 389 . . . . . . . 8 |- ((x = A /\ ph) -> A e. V)
98con3i 98 . . . . . . 7 |- (-. A e. V -> -. (x = A /\ ph))
109nexdv 1308 . . . . . 6 |- (-. A e. V -> -. E.x(x = A /\ ph))
117con3i 98 . . . . . . . 8 |- (-. A e. V -> -. x = A)
1211pm2.21d 78 . . . . . . 7 |- (-. A e. V -> (x = A -> ph))
131219.21aiv 1268 . . . . . 6 |- (-. A e. V -> A.x(x = A -> ph))
144, 10, 13sylanc 471 . . . . 5 |- (-. A e. V -> (-. E.x(x = A /\ ph) <-> A.x(x = A -> ph)))
1514bibi2d 616 . . . 4 |- (-. A e. V -> (([A / x]ph <-> -. E.x(x = A /\ ph)) <-> ([A / x]ph <-> A.x(x = A -> ph))))
1615orbi2d 612 . . 3 |- (-. A e. V -> ((([A / x]ph <-> E.x(x = A /\ ph)) \/ ([A / x]ph <-> -. E.x(x = A /\ ph))) <-> (([A / x]ph <-> E.x(x = A /\ ph)) \/ ([A / x]ph <-> A.x(x = A -> ph)))))
173, 16mpbii 193 . 2 |- (-. A e. V -> (([A / x]ph <-> E.x(x = A /\ ph)) \/ ([A / x]ph <-> A.x(x = A -> ph))))
182, 17pm2.61i 126 1 |- (([A / x]ph <-> E.x(x = A /\ ph)) \/ ([A / x]ph <-> A.x(x = A -> ph)))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 2   -> wi 3   <-> wb 146   \/ wo 222   /\ wa 223  A.wal 950  E.wex 956   = wceq 1099   e. wcel 1105  [wsbc 1153  Vcvv 1786
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-4 951  ax-5 952  ax-6 953  ax-7 954  ax-gen 955  ax-8 1101  ax-9 1102  ax-10 1103  ax-12 1104  ax-17 1190  ax-16 1194  ax-11o 1202  ax-ext 1436
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147  df-or 224  df-an 225  df-ex 957  df-sb 1155  df-clab 1441  df-cleq 1446  df-clel 1449  df-v 1787  df-sbc 1913
Copyright terms: Public domain