HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem stdpc5 1054
Description: An axiom scheme of standard predicate calculus that emulates Axiom 5 of [Mendelson] p. 69. The hypothesis (ph -> A.xph) can be thought of as emulating "x is not free in ph." With this convention, the meaning of "not free" is less restrictive than the usual textbook definition; for example x would not (for us) be free in x = x by hbequid 1165. This theorem scheme can be proved as a metatheorem of Mendelson's axiom system, even though it is slightly stronger than his Axiom 5.
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
stdpc5.1 |- (ph -> A.xph)
Assertion
Ref Expression
stdpc5 |- (A.x(ph -> ps) -> (ph -> A.xps))

Proof of Theorem stdpc5
StepHypRef Expression
1 stdpc5.1 . . 3 |- (ph -> A.xph)
2119.21 1052 . 2 |- (A.x(ph -> ps) <-> (ph -> A.xps))
32biimp 151 1 |- (A.x(ph -> ps) -> (ph -> A.xps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 3  A.wal 951
This theorem is referenced by:  ra5 1990
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 4  ax-2 5  ax-3 6  ax-mp 7  ax-gen 960  ax-4 970  ax-5o 972  ax-6o 975
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 147
Copyright terms: Public domain