Theorem 3adantlr3 41291

Description: Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3adantlr3.1	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3adantlr3	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Proof of Theorem 3adantlr3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpll 765	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑)
2		simplr1 1211	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)
3		simplr2 1212	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒)
4	2, 3	jca 514	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
5		simpr 487	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃)
6		3adantlr3.1	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)
7	1, 4, 5, 6	syl21anc 835	1 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-3an 1085

This theorem is referenced by:  fourierdlem42  42428