Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  axacndlem3 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem axacndlem3 9375
 Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Choice with no distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
axacndlem3 (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))

Proof of Theorem axacndlem3
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfae 2315 . . . 4 𝑧𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧
2 simpl 473 . . . . . 6 ((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → 𝑦𝑧)
32alimi 1736 . . . . 5 (∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∀𝑥 𝑦𝑧)
4 nd3 9355 . . . . . 6 (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑦𝑧)
54pm2.21d 118 . . . . 5 (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑦𝑧 → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
63, 5syl5 34 . . . 4 (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
71, 6alrimi 2080 . . 3 (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
87axc4i 2127 . 2 (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
9 19.8a 2049 . 2 (∀𝑦𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)) → ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
108, 9syl 17 1 (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1478  ∃wex 1701 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1719  ax-4 1734  ax-5 1836  ax-6 1885  ax-7 1932  ax-9 1996  ax-10 2016  ax-11 2031  ax-12 2044  ax-13 2245  ax-ext 2601  ax-sep 4741  ax-nul 4749  ax-pr 4867  ax-reg 8441 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1483  df-ex 1702  df-nf 1707  df-sb 1878  df-clab 2608  df-cleq 2614  df-clel 2617  df-nfc 2750  df-ral 2912  df-rex 2913  df-v 3188  df-dif 3558  df-un 3560  df-nul 3892  df-sn 4149  df-pr 4151 This theorem is referenced by:  axacndlem5  9377  axacnd  9378
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator