| Description: The Null Set Axiom of ZF
set theory: there exists a set with no
elements. Axiom of Empty Set of [Enderton] p. 18. In some textbooks,
this is presented as a separate axiom; here we show it can be derived
from Separation ax-sep 2699. This version of the Null Set Axiom tells
us that at least one empty set exists, but does not tells us that it
is unique - we need the Axiom of Extensionality to do that (see
zfnuleu 2703).
This proof, suggested by Jeff Hoffman (3-Feb-2008), does not require the
set existence axiom ax-9 964, unlike some empty set existence proofs
(such as the remark in [Kunen] p. 11).
However, it uses ax-4 972, which
also presupposes the existence of at least one set, i.e it does not hold
in a "free logic" valid in empty domains. Theorem ax4 971,
which shows
the redundancy of ax-4 972, depends on ax-9 964
for its proof. See
axnul2 2704 for a similar proof directly from ax-rep 2689.
This theorem should not be referenced by any proof. Instead, use
ax-nul 2706 below so that the uses of the Null Set Axiom
can be more easily
identified. |