Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Jonathan Ben-Naim < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  bnj601 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem bnj601 32194
Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 32195. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
bnj601.1 (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj601.2 (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj601.3 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj601.4 (𝜒 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓)))
bnj601.5 (𝜃 ↔ ∀𝑚𝐷 (𝑚 E 𝑛[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒))
Assertion
Ref Expression
bnj601 (𝑛 ≠ 1o → ((𝑛𝐷𝜃) → 𝜒))
Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑦   𝐷,𝑓,𝑖   𝑅,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑦   𝑥,𝑓,𝑚,𝑛   𝜑,𝑖,𝑚   𝜓,𝑚
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑛)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝜃(𝑥,𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐷(𝑥,𝑦,𝑚,𝑛)   𝑅(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj601
Dummy variables 𝑝 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 bnj601.1 . 2 (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2 bnj601.2 . 2 (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3 bnj601.3 . 2 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
4 bnj601.4 . 2 (𝜒 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴𝑥𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛𝜑𝜓)))
5 bnj601.5 . 2 (𝜃 ↔ ∀𝑚𝐷 (𝑚 E 𝑛[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒))
6 biid 263 . 2 ([𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑)
7 biid 263 . 2 ([𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓)
8 biid 263 . 2 ([𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜒)
9 bnj602 32189 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑧 → pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅))
109cbviunv 4967 . . . . . 6 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)
1110opeq2i 4809 . . . . 5 𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩ = ⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩
1211sneqi 4580 . . . 4 {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} = {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
1312uneq2i 4138 . . 3 (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
14 dfsbcq 3776 . . 3 ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) → ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑))
1513, 14ax-mp 5 . 2 ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜑)
16 dfsbcq 3776 . . 3 ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) → ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓))
1713, 16ax-mp 5 . 2 ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜓)
18 dfsbcq 3776 . . 3 ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) → ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒))
1913, 18ax-mp 5 . 2 ([(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒[(𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) / 𝑓]𝜒)
2013eqcomi 2832 . 2 (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}) = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})
21 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑓 Fn 𝑚[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜑[𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜓))
22 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝𝑚) ↔ (𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝𝑚))
23 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ↔ (𝑚𝐷𝑛 = suc 𝑚𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
24 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 = suc 𝑖) ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 = suc 𝑖))
25 biid 263 . 2 ((𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖) ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖𝑛𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖))
26 eqid 2823 . 2 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
27 eqid 2823 . 2 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
28 eqid 2823 . 2 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
29 eqid 2823 . 2 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, 𝑧 ∈ (𝑓𝑝) pred(𝑧, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
301, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 20bnj600 32193 1 (𝑛 ≠ 1o → ((𝑛𝐷𝜃) → 𝜒))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 208  wa 398  w3a 1083   = wceq 1537  wcel 2114  ∃!weu 2653  wne 3018  wral 3140  [wsbc 3774  cdif 3935  cun 3936  c0 4293  {csn 4569  cop 4575   ciun 4921   class class class wbr 5068   E cep 5466  suc csuc 6195   Fn wfn 6352  cfv 6357  ωcom 7582  1oc1o 8097  w-bnj17 31958   predc-bnj14 31960   FrSe w-bnj15 31964
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-rep 5192  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pow 5268  ax-pr 5332  ax-un 7463  ax-reg 9058
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ne 3019  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-reu 3147  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-pss 3956  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-tp 4574  df-op 4576  df-uni 4841  df-iun 4923  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-mpt 5149  df-tr 5175  df-id 5462  df-eprel 5467  df-po 5476  df-so 5477  df-fr 5516  df-we 5518  df-xp 5563  df-rel 5564  df-cnv 5565  df-co 5566  df-dm 5567  df-rn 5568  df-res 5569  df-ima 5570  df-ord 6196  df-on 6197  df-lim 6198  df-suc 6199  df-iota 6316  df-fun 6359  df-fn 6360  df-f 6361  df-f1 6362  df-fo 6363  df-f1o 6364  df-fv 6365  df-om 7583  df-1o 8104  df-bnj17 31959  df-bnj14 31961  df-bnj13 31963  df-bnj15 31965
This theorem is referenced by:  bnj852  32195
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator