Theorem bnj96 32139

Description: Technical lemma for bnj150 32150. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj96.1	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj96	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = 1o)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj96

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj93 32137	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
2		dmsnopg 6072	. . 3 ⊢ ( pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V → dom {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} = {∅})
3	1, 2	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → dom {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} = {∅})
4		bnj96.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
5	4	dmeqi 5775	. 2 ⊢ dom 𝐹 = dom {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
6		df1o2 8118	. 2 ⊢ 1o = {∅}
7	3, 5, 6	3eqtr4g 2883	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = 1o)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3496  ∅c0 4293  {csn 4569  ⟨cop 4575  dom cdm 5557  1_oc1o 8097   predc-bnj14 31960   FrSe w-bnj15 31964

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pr 5332

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ral 3145  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-op 4576  df-br 5069  df-dm 5567  df-suc 6199  df-1o 8104  df-bnj13 31963  df-bnj15 31965

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj150  32150