Theorem bnj970 32221

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 32284. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj970.3	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
bnj970.10	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj970	⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

Proof of Theorem bnj970

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj970.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2	1	bnj1232 32077	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
3	2	3ad2ant1 1129	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
4	3	adantl 484	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐷)
5		simpr3 1192	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)
6		bnj970.10	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
7	6	bnj923 32041	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝑛 ∈ ω)
8		peano2 7604	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ω → suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)
9		eleq1 2902	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω))
10		bianir 1053	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ (𝑝 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝑛 ∈ ω)) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
11	8, 9, 10	syl2an 597	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
12	7, 11	sylan 582	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ ω)
13		df-suc 6199	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑛 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
14	13	eqeq2i 2836	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 ↔ 𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}))
15		ssun2 4151	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛})
16		vex 3499	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑛 ∈ V
17	16	snnz 4713	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑛} ≠ ∅
18		ssn0 4356	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (({𝑛} ⊆ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ∧ {𝑛} ≠ ∅) → (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅)
19	15, 17, 18	mp2an 690	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅
20		neeq1 3080	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → (𝑝 ≠ ∅ ↔ (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) ≠ ∅))
21	19, 20	mpbiri 260	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = (𝑛 ∪ {𝑛}) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
22	14, 21	sylbi 219	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = suc 𝑛 → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
23	22	adantl 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ≠ ∅)
24	6	eleq2i 2906	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}))
25		eldifsn 4721	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ (ω ∖ {∅}) ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
26	24, 25	bitri 277	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ (𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ≠ ∅))
27	12, 23, 26	sylanbrc 585	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)
28	4, 5, 27	syl2anc 586	1 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 = suc 𝑛)) → 𝑝 ∈ 𝐷)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 3018   ∖ cdif 3935   ∪ cun 3936   ⊆ wss 3938  ∅c0 4293  {csn 4569  suc csuc 6195   Fn wfn 6352  ωcom 7582   ∧ w-bnj17 31958   FrSe w-bnj15 31964

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pr 5332  ax-un 7463

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ne 3019  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-pss 3956  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-tp 4574  df-op 4576  df-uni 4841  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-tr 5175  df-eprel 5467  df-po 5476  df-so 5477  df-fr 5516  df-we 5518  df-ord 6196  df-on 6197  df-lim 6198  df-suc 6199  df-om 7583  df-bnj17 31959

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj910  32222