Theorem brabidga 35617

Description: The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5420. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2386, see brabidgaw 35616 for a weaker version that does not require it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
brabidga.1	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brabidga	⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem brabidga

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brabidga.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
2	1	breqi 5071	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦)
3		df-br 5066	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
4		opabid 5412	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
5	2, 3, 4	3bitri 299	1 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2110  ⟨cop 4572   class class class wbr 5065  {copab 5127

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-13 2386  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5202  ax-nul 5209  ax-pr 5329

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-sn 4567  df-pr 4569  df-op 4573  df-br 5066  df-opab 5128

This theorem is referenced by: (None)