Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > brcodir | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
brcodir | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | brcog 5731 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵))) | |
2 | vex 3497 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
3 | brcnvg 5744 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)) | |
4 | 2, 3 | mpan 688 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑧◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑧)) |
5 | 4 | anbi2d 630 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
6 | 5 | adantl 484 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
7 | 6 | exbidv 1918 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧◡𝑅𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
8 | 1, 7 | bitrd 281 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(◡𝑅 ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐴𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑧))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 ∃wex 1776 ∈ wcel 2110 Vcvv 3494 class class class wbr 5058 ◡ccnv 5548 ∘ ccom 5553 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1907 ax-6 1966 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2112 ax-9 2120 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2173 ax-ext 2793 ax-sep 5195 ax-nul 5202 ax-pr 5321 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1536 df-ex 1777 df-nf 1781 df-sb 2066 df-mo 2618 df-eu 2650 df-clab 2800 df-cleq 2814 df-clel 2893 df-nfc 2963 df-rab 3147 df-v 3496 df-dif 3938 df-un 3940 df-in 3942 df-ss 3951 df-nul 4291 df-if 4467 df-sn 4561 df-pr 4563 df-op 4567 df-br 5059 df-opab 5121 df-cnv 5557 df-co 5558 |
This theorem is referenced by: codir 5974 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |